Regulatory Claims Exclusion

Regulatory Claims ExclusionNavigators Sues More Appraisers to Deny Coverage under “Regulatory Claims” Exclusion

Last Thursday, November 14, Navigators Insurance Company sued two more appraisers to enforce “regulatory claims” exclusions in the E&O policies they purchased. These appraisers are in Nevada. Like the appraiser sued by Navigators in Florida on November 6, the Nevada appraisers are being sued by the FDIC for professional negligence in cases filed about a year ago. The objective of Navigators’ lawsuits is to seek court confirmation of Navigators’ legal position that there is no coverage under Navigators’ policy for damages awarded against the appraisers to the FDIC, which is demanding about $500,000 from each appraiser, or any coverage for attorneys’ fees and costs to defend the cases beyond $100,000.  The FDIC’s lawsuits against the Nevada appraisers are both scheduled to be ready for trial in December; as a result, the appraisers now each have two lawsuits they must defend: the FDIC’s case and Navigators’ case regarding the insurance coverage. One of the latest lawsuits can be found on our website. Accompanying the lawsuit as an exhibit is the appraiser’s E&O policy from the Navigators program with the exclusion.

Navigators’ lawsuits to deny the appraisers coverage again relate to the “regulatory claims” exclusion in many Navigators’ policies — a similar version of which can be found in some policies from General Star and which may be present in future policies sold by Great American Insurance Group. I’ve warned appraisers and also lenders and AMCs on this blog about the relevance of these types of exclusions in E&O policies for the last several years. One of my first warnings came in 2011 when “regulatory claims” exclusions first started appearing in policies sold by General Star: “Some Appraiser E&O Policies Now Exclude FDIC or Other Regulatory Agency Claims,” April 8, 2011. We are now seeing those exclusions come home to roost in actual cases.

In my opinion, Navigators is technically correct in its legal position about the lack of coverage for FDIC claims in its policy in each lawsuit. Navigators’ policy in each case says what it says: (1) the policy does not cover damages in any claim by the FDIC, (2) Navigators has no duty to defend an appraiser against an FDIC claim, and (3) the appraiser is limited to payment of $100,000 for attorneys’ fees and costs in defending him or herself against the FDIC. However, there are still big problems. First, Navigators has chosen an extremely distressing time for the appraisers to sue them over this insurance issue — each of the appraisers is only weeks away from needing to be ready for trial with the FDIC. The appraisers are facing these lawsuits by Navigators to deny insurance coverage right when they have the FDIC trials looming over them. Navigators’ legal battle about this issue crosses over a number of cases and, to a large extent, the appraisers unfortunately are pawns in Navigators’ bigger battle with the FDIC, which is being coordinated across the country by high-powered Washington, DC law firm Wiley Rein LLP.

Second, the coverage problem with the policies for these appraisers relates to a bigger issue which goes back to when “regulatory claims” exclusions were first introduced by some appraiser E&O programs. In 2010 and 2011, a popular E&O program for appraisers by insurer General Star was discontinued with the program administrator Landy. The General Star policies in that program did not have “regulatory claims” exclusions, but General Star undoubtedly realized that the FDIC and other regulatory agencies were more frequently suing over appraisal problems. When that program was discontinued, most of the appraisers with old General Star policies were moved to new policies from both Navigators and General Star. Some of these new polices (depending on the state with Navigators and depending on the date of coverage with General Star) now included “regulatory claims” exclusions for the first time.  Some of the appraisers involved in FDIC claims have told me that they did not realize the change in their E&O because they never expected a policy for appraisal work would exclude fundamental coverage for claims by a banking regulator like the FDIC which is known to sue appraisers. It is possible that the FDIC itself has realized these issues and that it will now be raising them in response to the lawsuits filed by Navigators.

“Regulatory Claims” Exclusions Are a Problem for Appraisers Beyond FDIC Lawsuits.

Appraisers and the clients that hire them need to know that “regulatory claims” exclusions are not just a problem for appraisers being sued by the FDIC about appraisals at the peak of the real estate bubble. “Regulatory claims” exclusions are a problem relating to current appraisal work as well. For example, a popular appraiser E&O policy from General Star includes the following exclusion in policies sold to appraisers (if the “prior acts” date on the appraiser’s policy is before 8/31/08):
General Star - FDIC Exclusion (Prior Acts before 8-1-08)

Under the above exclusion from General Star, the appraiser has no insurance coverage for any claim brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees the GSEs and which is currently engaged in extensive mortgage repurchase and securities litigation. This lack of coverage is relevant not only to the appraisers who did the allegedly deficient appraisals behind defaulted mortgages but also to the hundreds or thousands of appraisers currently doing review work used by FHFA. It is ironic that the AMCs and law firms hiring these review appraisers for the FHFA typically require review appraisers to maintain E&O — but have no idea that some of the polices of those appraisers expressly deny coverage for that work.

Looking at the last line of the above regulatory claims exclusion of the General Star policy, it also states that “this exclusion applies to any ‘similar entity or organization’ whose mission is to… insure …any financial instrument of customers or financial or depository institutions.” To this lawyer, that means and includes the FHA because it insures mortgages and thus also means that appraisers with this particular policy would have no coverage for claims brought by or on behalf of the FHA.

I have to make it clear that not all E&O policies for appraisers have “regulatory claims” exclusions. For some insurance carriers, it depends on the state or dates of the appraisers’ coverage. However, even in high risk states, coverage without any “regulatory claims” exclusions is available in LIA’s appraiser E&O program and I believe also available in competitive programs from Intercorp and FREA.

Peter Christensen
Image credit flickr -GotCredit
Peter Christensen

Peter Christensen

Peter Christensen is an attorney, licensed in California and Washington. His legal practice primarily serves the real estate valuation community - Valuation Legal. He's the author of Risk Management for Real Estate Appraisers and Appraisal Firms, published by the Appraisal Institute.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

We welcome critical posts & opposing points of view. We value robust & civil discourse. You may openly disagree, but state your case in an atmosphere of mutual respect, in which everyone has a right to a particular view about the topic of conversation. Please keep remarks about the topic at hand, & PLEASE avoid personal attacks. If the poster gets you upset, it is the Internet, you can walk away from it.

Personal attacks harm the collegial atmosphere we encourage on AppraisersBlogs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

xml sitemap

Regulatory Claims Exclusion

by Peter Christensen time to read: 4 min