Louisiana Makes History – C&R Fee
- Fee Transparency, Pivotal Point for Appraisers - October 23, 2019
- AQB Proposes Alternative to College Degree Requirement - May 19, 2016
- The Decline of Appraisers - February 22, 2016
First Enforcement of C&R Fee Provision: Louisiana Makes History
Nearly five years after Dodd-Frank set forth rules regarding Customary & Reasonable fees (C&R) for appraisers, an agreement last week between a state board and an Appraisal Management Company (AMC) is the first evidence of enforcement. The bottom line for appraisers is that they may be finally on their way back to customary and reasonable fees.
On June 4, 2015, the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board (LREAB) issued a Stipulations and Order Memorandum (SOM) wherein Coester Appraisal Management Group, also known as Coester VMS, offers no admission of guilt but agrees to follow the current Louisiana fee schedule for a period of 12 months and pay $5,000 in administrative costs. Coester also will submit Quarterly reports to the Board for a period of 12 months, which list “all appraisal orders in Louisiana, the fee paid and the date payment was made to the appraiser.”
In the Final Order obtained by WRE under the Freedom of Information Act, Coester agrees not to contest the case while simultaneously alleging that, “it (Coester) complied with the federal law, and as such, it was in compliance with Louisiana Law.” In contrast, the Louisiana Board alleges that “Coester Appraisal Management Group did not use established fees set by an objective third party or use the factors set forth” in Louisiana law, in determining fees paid to appraisers.
LREAC and the Appraisal Institute
In a press release published by the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Coalition (LREAC), Joseph Mier, SRA, AI-RRS, RAA and President of LREAC stated: “This is an important recognition that the Louisiana Appraisal Board is addressing complaints made by appraisers in reference to C&R Fee rules being followed. This is a step in the right direction for transparency for consumers and for the health of the appraisal industry going forward. Working together with Louisiana appraisers, the Louisiana Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and the national Appraisal Institute, we hope that this will help to advance transparency for the appraisal industry in the future. Appraisers are reminded to report any violations of the current AMC laws and rules to the LREAB so that the law is adhered to fairly across the board for everyone.”
In an interview with Working RE, Mier stressed that it’s important for appraisers to not adopt an “us versus them” mentality with regards to AMCs. “The goal for appraisers should not be to harm AMCs. The real message is that we need work together,” Mier said. “AMCs have a purpose, but the business model of some AMCs have hurt the entire industry. A business model that takes a significant portion of appraisers’ fees and pays non-C&R fees, as per the Dodd/Frank Rules, results in high quality appraisers leaving the industry or refusing to work for AMCs altogether. It also discourages young professionals from joining the industry, which is an important consideration given that the latest Appraiser Quality Monitoring requirements have made it even more difficult to be an appraiser. Both appraisers and AMCs have an interest in compensating appraisers fairly with a minimum C&R fee,” says Mier.
Finally, Mier says that LREAC is appreciative of the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board (LREAB) for their efforts to follow up on real complaints by appraisers and for the changes that Coester VMS is making. “We appreciate Coester VMS recognizing the need to follow one of the two presumptions of compliance by utilizing the current fee schedule that’s been established by the third party fee survey in Louisiana. They have agreed to make several important changes and we appreciate that. These industry issues can be repaired but the current business model must change going forward. It will take all industry partners to be involved to make that happen.” says Mier.
This is not the first time that Coester VMS has been a target for state boards. Besides being investigated by LREAB, Coester was also sanctioned by the North Carolina Appraisers Board for failure to pay appraisers on time. In a Consent Order signed October 13, 2014, Coester admitted that it failed to pay appraiser invoices on time. As a result of the Board’s investigation, it was discovered that 1,066 payments to appraisers were made beyond the 30 day requirement mandated by North Carolina law. Consequently, Coester was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $10,000 and had its AMC license suspended for a period of six months. However, the suspension was stayed until February 2015.
What are C&R Fees?
In Louisiana, AMCs may comply with the C&R Fee Legislation by using “objective third-party information such as government agency fee schedules, academic studies, and independent private sector surveys” to develop a fee schedule. However, the Louisiana law, modeled after Dodd-Frank, also specifies that “fee studies shall exclude assignments ordered by appraisal management companies.” If an AMC decides not to use a set fee schedule based on independent fee surveys, the AMC “shall maintain written documentation that describes or substantiates all methods, factors, variations, and differences used to determine the customary and reasonable fee for appraisal services,” which, at a minimum, includes six elements an AMC must document and analyze for every assignment order.
In its complaint against Coester VMS, LREAB alleges that Coester was using neither established fees set by an objective third party nor the factors set forth in Louisiana law. To read the Louisiana law in its entirety, click here: http://www.reab.state.la.us/AMC_Rules.html.
When Louisiana’s law first passed in 2013, LREAB commissioned a statewide survey to be conducted by the Southeastern Louisiana University Business Research Center (SLUBRC). Because Dodd-Frank specifically excludes AMC-ordered appraisals in determining C&R fees, the survey focused on fees paid by banks, not AMCs. The survey also includes appraiser input for comparison, based on their work with banks and other non-AMC clients.
The table below represents the median appraisal fee reported in the survey paid by banks directly to appraisers. (Read the complete fee survey report here).
| Median Appraisal Fees by type of appraisal
|Form 1004||Form 1004 FHA||Form 1025||Form 1073||Form 2055|
This first enforcement of C&R fee provisions is a victory appraisers have long waited for, according to Richard Hagar, SRA. Hagar says it’s likely that Louisiana’s example will embolden other state boards to take action on C&R fees. “Louisiana is one of the first states to take action like this, and there will be more coming from other boards. More and more states will begin looking at the issue of C&R fees, talking about the process involved in enforcing them, and starting to do something about it,” says Hagar.
The Dodd-Frank Act and other federal regulations have granted the authority to license and regulate AMCs to all states, and according to Hagar, that includes enforcing C&R fee provisions. Hagar also makes a nuanced point regarding C&R requirements: “To date, currently 35 states have enacted AMC licensing laws. More will follow. As they enact those licensing laws, the states will have the authority to enforce C&R fees. States don’t necessarily need to write C&R enforcement powers into their AMC regulations the way Louisiana did. It’s in federal law. Once it’s in federal law, AMCs must operate under federal guidelines and their state boards have the authority to sanction them for violating those laws,” argues Hagar.
Increased regulation and enforcement of AMCs will help the industry, argues Hagar. “In order to stick around, AMCs are going to need to be more business-like and operate more ethically. As enforcement of C&R fee provisions finally catches on, we should see a decrease in lowball appraisal (email) order systems, because shopping for the fastest and the cheapest appraiser is prohibited. Appraisers, in turn, should be freed to raise their fees and provide a superior product,” says Hagar.
Upcoming Live Webinars:
Thursday: How to Support and Prove Your Adjustments – A Closer Look
Presented by Richard Hagar, SRA
Part 1: Available Now
Part 2: June 11th, 10 – 12:00 p.m. PST
“I have been an appraiser for over 20 years and have rarely heard the information that Hagar was teaching from anyone except my mentor and former boss who is an MAI. Hagar’s class is not only essential, it is exceptional. He manages to keep it interesting as well as highly informative. I will remember his name for future continuing education classes. Thanks for sponsoring such a high quality instructor. – John P Thermos
Updated and expanded, Hagar shows you how to properly support your adjustments- the foundation of good appraising! Regulations state that appraisal adjustments cannot be based upon an appraiser’s opinion. Failure to provide proper proof and analysis to support your adjustments means a rough road ahead: state board complaints, panel removal, lawsuits, even license revocation. Fannie Mae cites “the use of adjustments that do not reflect market reaction” as the number one reason an appraiser can be “blacklisted.” This training is critical in helping appraisers avoid catastrophic appraisal failures. Sign Up Now!
Back by Popular Demand!
This webinar will help you utilize quick and simple methods for proving adjustments that improve the quality of your reports and help you avoid problems, blacklisting and legal actions. Sign Up Now!
Save with a Season Ticket!
Enjoy the entire summer webinar series at your leisure (live and recorded) and save: June, July, and August Webinars (six webinars) for a single price!
Regular Price:$237 Summer Series Season Ticket: $149
June- How to Support and Prove Your Adjustments
Part 1: How to Get What You’re Worth (Working with AMCs)
Part 2: How to Work Profitably With AMCs
Part 1: Running an Effective Appraisal Business
Part 2: Efficiency Through Technology: Mobile Tools and Paperless Appraising
Enjoy the Entire Series! Save $88 with a Season Ticket!
Coester VMS, offers no admission of guilt but agrees to follow the current Louisiana fee schedule for a period of 12 months and pay $5,000 in administrative costs.
HISTORY…LOL… I’m laughing so hard I’m crying…..LOL…and they only did this in one state…LOL…
All the haters are going to say…Well what are you doing…I’M NOT ACCEPTING THOSE LOW FEES! It’s your business stop accepting low fees or if you think your worth pennies and want AMC’s to earn more money more power to you baby!
i agree with you Koma – i am laughing too. and what makes people laugh? JOKES, and that is what this is.
allow everyone involved in LA to pat themselves on their backs today for a few seconds, but lets look at the bigger picture.
1. IT TOOK ALMOST FIVE YEARS to get here.
2. THIS IS ONE STATE. where are all the other states? what are all the other states waiting for? how many more years will it take before all the other states finally get off THEIR backsides?
3. THIS IS ONLY ONE issue that has gotten A LITTLE resolved. how many other issues have appraisers been barking about for years? Hint – A LOT.
4. how long will it be until all the AMC’s take notice of this, and actually release a little control of our fees, and allow them to get closer to where they should be?
the sad part is, its too little and way too late. we have lost over 50,000 members in about ten years, partly because of this low fee issue. none of them are coming back. how many more have we lost or are losing right now because of this one issue?
appraisers have been barking about all kinds of issues like this for a very long time, and its beyond comprehension and common sense why nobody is willing to listen. when decision-making individuals sit in their suits, in air conditioned offices, and get a paycheck no matter what the heck happens, i suppose they dont need to care about us, right?
yes this is a step in the right direction, but this story reminds me of looking into the big night sky and seeing one bright twinkling star, and this certainly doesnt keep us from becoming the next Radio Shack or K-Mart real soon.
the bleeding slowed for about two seconds, but we are right back to bleeding again . . . . .
$5,000 WHOLE DOLLARS?
OMG…AMC will all be out of business within a year! This could even take down some of the largest banks in America that own AMCs. So long Chase & Bank Of America.
(Sarcasm Detector: Off The Scale)
Please tell us that this is a joke rather than a genuine article.
Bubba sure hit the nail on the heat when he said, “NONE OF THEM ARE COMING BACK.”. I wouldn’t return to the industry if NBC News announced “AMCs Were Declared Illegal Today Across The U.S.” Why? They’ve managed to muck this profession up in a thousand different ways over the past decade and they continue to screw it up for appraisers on a monthly basis. You’d have to pay me well over $1,000 for an easy 1,000 ranch home appraisal (COLLECT AT THE DOOR) before I would even consider sticking my small toe into these liability infested waters.
In the meantime, daily instances of violations of C&R flow out into appraisers email boxes nationally, minute by minute, and hour by hour. I don’t think anyone would take action, if I furnished all those ridiculous low fee requests. And these days the amc’s are getting savvy to impending enforcement, so now they call appraisers endlessly like telemarketers, trying to get the best fee and tat for each individual order. Their staff turns over regularly, so most callers do not even know they’re breaking federal law with their assignment methods. I’m on the do not call list, to avoid being hassled by telemarketers, but it turns out that every amc in the country is suddenly bothering me, trying to get my services cheaper and faster than the next guy. This whole thing is absurd, to think only Coester gets a fine, and everyone else walks scott free. Coester is absolutely not the only amc engaging in those practices. I care about the little things, you know…. I think it’s important for the assignment company whom demands ethical compliance, not break federal law as a routine course of action in their assignment approaches. It’s the little things that matter. Imagine if such a standard was applied to babysitters, and someone told you you’ll get better, more trustworthy babysitting services, if you’d just trust this convicted felon to manage hiring your babysitter. Think about it. How can we have confidence in an assignment company who’s job it is to increase the ethical reliability of orders, when they are both aloof and literally unaware of the law itself? Either your good enough to be on that panel, and receive a fair share of orders, or you’re not a good fit for that particular outfit, and should not be on that panel. Demand rotational assignment, stop it with the stats nonsense, and force separation of amc and appraisers fees with itemized disclosure separate. Audit every single amc nationally, bi annually. Force compliance.
I am happy to see the State of Louisiana has at least made an attempt to do something about this issue. I am one of those that do not give a hoot about C&R. I cling to the premise that my appraisal business belongs to me. It is mine to operate as I see fit.
Each of us should be looking out for what we think is best for ourselves and our families. Just because “someone” decided that C&R for an appraisal in my area is Ten Dollars does not mean that I have to work for that fee. Just because AMCs exist as parasites on this industry does not mean that I have to work for them.
We are continually faced with challenges in this business. Soon FHA will impose a bunch of regulations on appraisers that will further reduce our income and increase our liability and workload. Again, I will say no to this. Our cheese is constantly being moved in this business. I suggest that each of us take some time and revise our business plan. Look at the big picture and seek some new business sources other than AMCs and FHA. Best of luck to each of us!