Tagged: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
Appraisal news for real estate appraisers and real estate professionals regarding the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. News relating to the Appraisal Industry.
What’s the Rush? Last week, a showdown was broadcast among three software providers to see who could complete a UAD 3.6 report in the shortest amount of time. I didn’t tune in because they charged to watch it. You read that right. They’re trying to extract more money from us so they can show us how they intend to extract more money from us. Today, I received an email from another software provider claiming they can complete a 3.6 report in under an hour. For this one, they’ve been kind enough to allow us to witness this miracle of modern...
If economic necessity forces you to accept UAD 3.6 assignments, you cannot afford to sign blindly while exposed to massive secondary market liability risks. The reality on the ground for independent real estate appraisers is unforgiving. While the industry debates the long term dangers of data harvesting, many independent business owners face an immediate, binary choice: sign the new UAD 3.6 reports and accept Certification 25, or stop feeding your family. Not every appraiser has a robust book of private estate, divorce, and non lending work. Transitioning away from AMCs takes time, marketing skills, and capital that many simply do...
The rollout of the new UAD 3.6 framework has triggered a major wave of compliance literature, and a perfect example is a recent article by Woody Fincham at Valuation Nation, titled “Certification 25: What’s the Real Risk to the Appraiser?”. In his piece, Woody sets aside the rhetoric and lists my AppraisersBlogs article regarding our legal defenses under this dataset as a citation reference at the end of his post. While he acknowledges the existence of this perspective, his broader argument claims that the legal risks of signing Certification 25 are low, the threat of regulatory discipline is minimal, and...
If you still think the corporate panic over structural data is just a theoretical debate about software licensing, a tech startup named Arloh just blew the entire script wide open. They have been running public marketing campaigns targeting small title, escrow, and appraisal firms with a staggering proposition: “Your old records could be worth millions.” One of their primary advertisements explicitly brags that a tiny 37-person title and escrow shop just received a ~$967,000 estimate simply for licensing their historical data archive for artificial intelligence training models. Let that dollar figure sink in for a second. Nearly one million dollars...
A fellow appraiser dropped a direct message in my inbox with a link to home inspector Preston Kincaid’s Facebook video, and watching him warn the public sent a chill through me because his words mirrored the exact warnings I have been shouting about our own appraisal profession. To understand the shock, you first need to know what Spectora is and how home inspectors work. Spectora is the dominant cloud software platform used by roughly 7,000 independent home inspectors across the country to draft, format, and deliver digital property inspection reports. By law and standard contract, home inspectors operate under strict...
The insurance industry just verified the erasure of my legal defenses under UAD 3.6. The corporate apologists and tech insiders have spent weeks trying to downplay the Certification 25 confidentiality crisis. They’ve lined up to tell independent appraisers that the new language is just a passive weather report, a routine disclosure, or an innocent acknowledgement of a reality that has existed for many years. But the ultimate reality check just arrived from the very people who calculate risk for a living, and it completely blows the corporate defense strategy out of the water. Isaac Peck, Publisher of Working RE Magazine...
We finally have a direct written response from The Appraisal Foundation regarding the Cert 25 confidentiality crisis and it is a masterclass in bureaucratic buck passing. A peer recently contacted TAF to ask how appraisers can remain compliant with the USPAP Ethics Rule while signing a form that opens the floodgates for data distribution. TAF basically hid under their desks. They claimed they cannot give legal advice and told us that questions about Cert 25 are best suited for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac since they built the form. Then they dropped this standard canned line to try and brush...
Why It Matters Appraiser independence is mandated by state and federal laws – not a professional courtesy. Every agent, broker, loan officer, lender and AMC involved in a transaction with a lender-ordered appraisal is legally prohibited from influencing the appraiser’s value conclusion and from interfering in the appraisal process. Violations can cost you your license, trigger federal civil penalties, NAR sanctions, civil liability, and in extreme cases, criminal prosecution.1 “I didn’t know” is not a defense. The Legal Foundation Three federal frameworks govern this area. Title XI of FIRREA (1989) requires all appraisals for federally related transactions to be performed...
The new fair‑housing course weaponizes protected characteristics to pressure appraisers into outcome‑driven valuation, directly contradicting USPAP’s prohibition on advocacy. The Fair Housing Course Is Training You to Break USPAP. You Have Until July 27 to Say So. The Appraiser Qualifications Board’s Second Exposure Draft keeps a required course that pressures new appraisers to advocate an outcome based on protected characteristics. That is not fair housing. It is not lawful. And you can still stop it — but the comment window closes July 27. Let me say it plainly. We are being pushed — through licensing law and federal fair-housing regulation...
The Irreconcilable Conflict Between USPAP’s Typical Buyer Standard and the Current Fair Housing Compliance Regime. Retain this document as a reference should you face a complaint grounded in disparate impact theory alone. The three-safeguard framework from Inclusive Communities provides a robust defense for any appraiser whose methodology is USPAP-compliant, well-documented, and market-supported. Introduction I want to state plainly what the appraisal profession has been tiptoeing around since roughly 2019: an appraiser cannot simultaneously comply with: 1- USPAP’s requirement to identify and analyze the most probable (typical) buyer of a property via market data AND… 2- comply with the current iteration...
