Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition
Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators.
I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such a way that ensnaring appraisers in an alleged bias complaint with their state regulator is probable. Mounting an appropriate and successful defense can be difficult, and expensive.
The proposed, and final, language needs to be simplified.
This is the article:
A ‘fifth’ is needed, in more ways than one! Exposure Draft to USPAP, that is.
After seeing the regulator’s response with concerns about how the 4th Exposure Draft anti-Bias and Discrimination addition to the Ethics Rule was being proposed, I had a suspicion that the Exposure Draft process would continue.
That was confirmed yesterday, February 16, 2023, in this news release from the Appraisal Standards Board: Appraisal Standards Board Responds to Public Feedback
The focus in USPAP has to be written more simply, and very directly as to what is expected. The previous drafts were far too complicated and confusing probably due to the high powered Washington D.C. attorneys hired to do the writing of the proposed new section in the Ethics Rule!
Watch for notice as to when the new Exposure Draft will be available for public comment. Then read it, and send in your response comments per the instructions therein.
- The Unbiased Reality of Census Tract Data Dump… Open Letter to FHFA - August 15, 2023
- Isn’t that Just PAVEY! PAVE Response and Marcia Fudge - August 8, 2023
- ‘Pesky’ Words. Keeping Appraisers out of Language Purgatory - July 26, 2023