Appraisal Racism… Fact or Fiction?

Appraisal Racism... Fact or Fiction? Where is the Actual Evidence?

Not one single point provides any evidence to the appraiser engaging in a racist act… No appraisal reports or actual evidence of racism has been produced by the accuser… Not one single case has been presented to the appraisal state boards…

The real estate community is aware of the recent onslaught of articles going around accusing real estate appraisers of racism and appraising homes for less than what the actual homeowner thinks the home is worth. It started with Abena Horton in Jacksonville, FL Additional accusations were made in Chicago, Denver, and Newark, NJ. Each article written accuses the appraiser of redlining and racism. However, not one single case has been presented to the state boards. Not one single point provides any evidence to the appraiser engaging in a racist act. All that has been presented is a claim, and a story which includes another appraisal done that is higher than the first one.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote an article about Abena Horton and her husband in Jacksonville, FL. You can read it here.

Since then, a couple of other articles have come about claiming that the Appraiser undervalued the home due to racism. Undervalued according to whom? The borrower? The lender? Zillow? I mention Zillow, because every article mentions Zillow and their magical and unforgettable algorithm called a Zestimate. Per Zillow’s website “a Zestimate is our free estimated value for an individual home…It is not an appraisal.” A Zestimate can’t distinguish neighborhoods, actual livable area of a home, the school districts, the condition of the house, and well the external influences the house may have. Yep, it’s the same algorithm that includes multiple listing services and tax data that may be inaccurate, as well as input by the individual homeowner – talk about BIAS!

I’ll get this out of the way right now. The most recent article that came from Denver, CO may show something, but it’s not racism. It shows something else, and that may well very be geographical competency. Geographical competency is where an appraiser has established knowledge of the area. They know the market area and are considered to be an expert in it. According to the article, the first appraiser used sales from across a major roadway instead of sales south of it. The difference in these two areas is, as one local appraiser put it, “very different,”, leading to a valuation that most likely wasn’t accurate the first time. The second appraiser used sales in this southside area and thus created a higher valuation. I won’t lie. I have seen this happen many times in my area due to appraisers not being from the area or unaware of the neighborhood nuances. Is this racism? It is not. It’s just bad appraisal practice that happened due to not knowing the area. (I am only speculating here as I do not know the appraisers involved). I know what you’re asking yourself?? How can an appraiser who is NOT from the area do an appraisal if they aren’t geographically competent? I ask myself this question every day. The answer goes back to the advent of the appraisal management company or AMC. AMCs are companies established to put a barrier in between the appraiser and the lender due to so-called collusion before the 2008 housing crash. The lender no longer picks the appraiser, the AMC does. Unfortunately many AMCs but not all will choose the cheapest and fastest appraiser to perform the appraisal instead of the most qualified and competent one. Why is this, you say? There are numerous articles about how AMCs are paid and how they have to make money. Most AMCs take a cut of the actual total fee, leaving the AMC with a handful of appraisers who will do the appraisal cheap and fast.

Would the consumer pay more for an expert or pay less for someone who has limited to no knowledge of the area? Is the consumer aware that the fee they are paying for the appraisal is being sent to several appraisers who bid their assignment fee, and that some AMCs will choose the cheapest appraisal bid and pocket the difference between what the consumer thinks they are paying for and what the appraiser is actually receiving? The consumer may be paying for an appraiser who lives outside the market with limited market knowledge as opposed to the one with greater market knowledge and experience? Maybe the consumer is getting an appraiser who is newly licensed last week as opposed to the one that has been appraising for decades? Perhaps the consumers should be mad at the lender and their AMC and not the appraiser, since the lender and their AMC are the ones that choose the potentially unqualified appraiser.

Is there a history of redlining in the United States? Yes. It is historically documented, with many federal, state, and local government policies that were put in place in the 1930’s. Laws were changed in the 1960’s to protect those affected by redlining and other discriminatory practices, yet the practice may still exist in lending and in the buying and selling of real estate. The most recent case involves Redfin, who is accused of systematic racial discrimination by offering fewer services to homebuyers and sellers in minority communities. The lawsuit against Redfin was filed by several fair housing organizations who appear to have evidence to support their claim that they wouldn’t offer services unless the homes were listed for at least $400,000 in Chicago, but services were offered in the majority white populated, suburban, DuPage County with a minimum price of $275,000.

The list price of the property is one of the components to the Redfin lawsuit. For appraisers choosing comparable sales based on the list price or the sale price is unacceptable. There are other components we must consider, including location, the type and style of property, the number of bedrooms, and baths, the utility of the property, the condition of the property, and/or any upgrades or modernization of the property. Price is not one of the search criteria of a knowledgeable and competent appraiser. Using price as a search criteria indicates the appraiser has a predetermined opinion of value, which is an unacceptable practice by law and profession. Appraisers can and have lost their licenses for appraisal opinions based on price.

After Abena Horton went on her crusade to claim the appraisal profession was racist due to HER GUT FEELING of racism, she still has yet to produce any factual evidence to prove racism. No appraisal reports or actual evidence of racism has been produced by the accuser. Abena Horton is the Assistant General Counsel and Vice President of Labor and Employment with Black Knight Financial, a leading automated valuation model company whose products competes directly with the appraisal profession. The appraisal profession has been the subject of her claims which have NO factual evidence. The only claim from Abena Horton is her biased opinion as the homeowner, who is not a licensed appraiser, who has not taken the necessary education to become an appraiser, who is not licensed by their state, and is not regulated by Congress. Appraisers can lose their license and potentially go to jail by developing appraisal opinions based on race or any other protected class under the federal Fair Housing Act.

Appraisers are bound by ethics rules outlined in USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice). Appraisers use the sales in your area, your neighborhood, etc., to determine the value. They use all the data or components they gather (stated above) assess your area, and determine a value based on the facts they have complied. One Data point they do not ever gather is RACE. Racism is real in this world in many areas; however, I find it hard to believe that an appraiser will appraise your home for less because of your race when the data they are gathering is from your immediate area. Appraisers cherish their license. It’s the thing they worked hard for in order to become an appraiser and to gain the knowledge needed to ensure the public trust. The mere thought of having a complaint against them is enough to cause mental and physical anguish. Are appraisers perfect? Absolutely NOT. Do they make mistakes just like you? They sure do and those mistakes can be pointed out with the right data and evidence.

There are procedures in place with all lenders that if a consumer disagrees with their home’s value, they can take action, like a Reconsideration of value (ROV). An ROV is where the consumer supplies information they believe the appraiser may have missed or that the consumer deems appropriate and they supply that to the lender to have the appraiser examine. The consumer can always get a second appraisal if they so choose to. There are systems in place. The consumer needs to use them.

If the consumer believes their home should be worth more money, is the cause automatically racism? If so, I hope there are facts to back any accusations. If we want to be mad because we think our home should be worth more and is not, maybe we should be mad at our neighbors who paid less for their property than we hoped our place is worth now. We can be mad at our county who has a history of systemic racism that is embedded into the algorithm of big data. We can also be mad at our elected officials, who seem to be kicking this problem into the future. We can’t be mad at the profession who is reflecting the market, which may be unpleasant news.

Racism is real. Racism is something that does need all of our attention; however, not everything is a result of racism.

By Dean Merriweather, Certified Residential Appraiser

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Avatar IMJSAYN says:

    Nothing but fiction! These claims are not based on facts since the accusers didn’t provide the appraisal reports and filed complaints with state boards. What happened to ‘innocent until proven guilty’?

  2. Avatar Cotton says:

    Big tech trying to figure out how to force their flawed products on our banking system. Im sure someone said in a meeting “if we just call them racist like the Democrats did to Trump maybe we can force the government to remove appraisers from the process”. Isn’t it funny to see all these people that cry racism are the ones who are truly racist? Appraiser’s should be outraged at these false accusations. I have been on this planet 55 yrs and have yet to meet a single white racist? Oddly when working is certain neighborhoods i have been called names, attempted car jacking, held up at gun point. Even with all that im still not racist. My mixed kids will attest to that! Good luck to the libtard media and organizations promoting this fraud. Only god can judge you for your lies and manipulation! Have a blessed thanksgiving!

  3. Avatar Julio E. Sune, Jr says:

    “Not one single point provides any evidence to the appraiser engaging in a racist act… No appraisal reports or actual evidence of racism has been produced by the accuser… Not one single case has been presented to the appraisal state boards…” [Dean Merriweather]



    My comment: Busted??? Who was busted??? There is NO reference of who was “busted”…Where is the evidence?


    There were [as of today 11-23-2020 –1300 HRS] 136 comments made in a previous article by the author. At some times, there were many arguments between appraisers….

    I say it is TIME to concentrate our efforts in making the TRUTH be known by the PUBLIC!!!!

    People want answers, but I say it is wrong when they believe quickly and blindly in something that is NOT factual and above all lacks logic
    and supported evidence just because they say so.

    There are too many who DO NOT UNDERSTAND that an appraisal IS NOT the number needed in a file in order to make a deal go through…

  4. Avatar Bill Johnson says:

    I’m currently working a VA appraisal that has a purchase price of one million, however based on my opinion and I think strong and supported evidence (comps on same street, inside same PUD, etc.), the market value is $920,000. Why the male listing agent had to work into the conversation his life partners name (Stan), and the new owners are of a certain skin color, is beyond me.

    Does not coming in at value make me a racist, and if so, am I discriminating against the gay agent, the current Latino owner, or the veteran wanting to buy the property? This is a serious question.

    Its apparently no longer our role to seek the truth and report it, but rather the truth now needs to be filtered through others eyes/view on racism.

    I hope the lender doesn’t ask why a section of the garage is blurred out on this one (Black Lives Matter sign), as again I wouldn’t know if I’m a racist for doing it. For the record, I always blur out every political sign, the owners view on society issues, and most every flag unless its a nation, and or state flag.

    Seek the truth.

  5. Avatar lance says:

    The race card will definitely get you what you want if you just scream loud enough for the media to hear you. No report to analyze and only one side of the story is given, sounds about right for the reverse influencers in todays world.

  6. Avatar Pat says:

    It is extremely upsetting how easy it is to claim racism and not have to support that the appraiser is at fault.

    • Avatar lance says:

      its upsetting that the media outlets will do anything to get people to watch or click their article, no integrity at all …. none! If you’re the type of person to take your pictures down and replace them with fakes instead of just asking for another appraiser’s opinion, you’re the problem ! you have tainted the process and you cannot be trusted.

  7. Avatar Jeanie says:

    This whole mockery started with the poor reporting of the New York Times reporter, Debra Kamin. It snowballed after that. The NYT is no longer a reliable source of news. Unfortunately, none of the mainstream media are

  8. Avatar ej says:

    The AMCs are the problem. Until the regulator’s crackdown on them, insanity will continue to reign. This morning I received an appraisal request from Alti source for a property that is 400 miles away.

  9. Baggins Baggins says:

    We’re no longer listening and are no longer interested in the appraisers are racist story. Propagated by the lending industry and their hopeful ladder climbing underlings, as they seek to drive up low income residents housing pricing for even less home ownership and even more residential debt. To lenders, more debt = more profit. Therefore, higher pricing is good! Enter the supposed fair housing advocates whom are only coincidentally funded by the same lenders who would make those higher priced home loans a reality.

    Because when you are trying to buy a home, the first thing you say is; “Can we pay a higher price for the house?” Or perhaps you say; “The government should really be forcing me to pay a higher purchase price on this home, I object to this lack of government price intervention on behalf of higher seller pricing.” Because higher pricing is exactly what impoverished supposedly underprivileged people request on a normal basis. One is a special kind of ignorant to buy into the narrative that more debt will equal better financial prosperity, that reductions in purchasing power equate to financial success. Governments are not thrifty, and neither are lenders. They deal with other peoples money and other peoples risk. If you confuse money with wealth and think borrowing more increases your financial position… There is the low information aspect of monetary education again.

    We could look to examples in other parts of the world for comparisons of wealth vs poverty. Get some more realistic and grounded perspective. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, as debt builds and the fed’s balance sheet expands at a record pace. There are no coincidences in the world of central banking and fiat money management.

    Vote with your wallet. Vote with your feet. Vote with your time. This is not about helping the impoverished, this is about monetizing activism, carving out successful high paying careers from social justice activism. T.E.A. Taxed Enough Already. These activists forgot about hearts and minds, instead going straight for the jugular and wallet. If you require the force of government to promote your cause, you really have no worthy cause at all. These things end up crushing under their own weight, but only after the human cost has outweighed whatever progress they hoped to make. Someone is going to get rich over this and I assure you, it will not be the ground level people these advocates had claimed they wanted to assist.


Leave a Reply

We welcome critical posts & opposing points of view. We value robust & civil discourse. You may openly disagree, but state your case in an atmosphere of mutual respect, in which everyone has a right to a particular view about the topic of conversation. Please keep remarks about the topic at hand, & PLEASE avoid personal attacks. If the poster gets you upset, it is the Internet, you can walk away from it.

Personal attacks harm the collegial atmosphere we encourage on AppraisersBlogs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

xml sitemap

Appraisal Racism… Fact or Fiction?

by Guest Author time to read: 7 min