<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professional</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/author/icap-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/author/icap-board/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 02:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Reconsider the Rule on Deferred Appraisals</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interim Final Rule]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAP commented on the impending Interim Final Rule that will allow real estate appraisals to be deferred for 120 days for certain real estate transactions. The letter states that the deferment could lead to several unsettling possibilities. The letter implores the agencies to reconsider this rule. Now is not the time to walk away from safety measures meant to insure the present and future movement of real estate, but to embrace them. Public Trust is the appraiser’s primary concern. To not have this certified and insured professional involved at the outset of real estate lending during this time, in some&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule">Reconsider the Rule on Deferred Appraisals</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23913</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Considered an Essential Business</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Under the order, “essential businesses” cover a wide variety of workers&#8230;Appraisers are considered an essential business&#8230; Illinois Governor Issues Stay-at-Home Order. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker today issued a “stay at home” order for the entire state starting Saturday March 21, 2020, at 5 p.m. through April 7. The order encourages all “essential businesses and operations” to remain open. Appraisers are considered an essential business The order encourages all “essential businesses and operations” to remain open, but directs them to enforce six-foot social distancing for both employees and customers. Under the order, “essential businesses” cover a wide variety of workers, including&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order">Appraisers Considered an Essential Business</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23707</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Evaluations: Concept Paper, Webinar, Public Meeting In early August, The Appraisal Foundation announced that the The Appraisal Standards Board would be considering adopting standards for evaluations in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). On September 3, 2019, they announced three opportunities to learn more and share your insights. Concept Paper The Appraisal Standards Board is seeking your feedback on the concept of developing standards for performing evaluations in USPAP. Submit your comments to ASBcomments@appraisalfoundation.org. The comment period closes on October 11, 2019. Read the evaluations concept paper here Webinar Wayne Miller, chair of the Appraisal Standards Board, and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella">Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="http://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NPR-appraisal-threshold.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22659</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Committee Passes H.R. 3619</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>H.R. 3619 has passed out of committee and is now sitting in the US House for consideration. H.R.3619 would amend the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 to provide the Appraisal Subcommittee with the authority to modify annual registry fees for appraisal management companies, to maintain a registry of trainees and charge a lower trainee registry fee, and to allow grants to States to assist appraiser and potential appraiser compliance with the Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and would require AMCs to disclose their fees. The NCUA Quadrupled The Appraisal Threshold For Nonresidential Real Estate Loans By a 2-1&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure">Committee Passes H.R. 3619</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22470</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Requests for Reconsiderations</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;appraisers continue to receive requests for reconsiderations on a daily basis. White Paper: Requests for Reconsiderations The paper states that one factor that complicates requests for revisions is that there are no consistent industrywide policies, guidelines, or forms related to this process. Furthermore, over recent years there have been changes in statute and policy with respect to appraiser independence obligations, which has resulted in some confusion among users of appraisal services (and appraisers) as to exactly what may be asked and provided in such requests. It is important to distinguish these requests from a request to make corrections or address&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations">Requests for Reconsiderations</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20370</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulators&#8217; Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement on Some Home Sales of $400,000 and Below&#8230; The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve released a proposal that would increase the appraisal requirement from $250,000 to $400,000, meaning that certain home sales of $400,000 and below would no longer require an appraisal. According to data provided by the FDIC, the agencies estimate that increasing the appraisal threshold from $250,000 to $400,000 would have exempted an additional 214,000 residential mortgages at regulated institutions from the agencies’ appraisal requirement in&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement">Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20222</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Waiver Programs&#8230; A Risky Business</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Inspection Waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAP (and 36 other industry groups) signed a Letter To The Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Over The New Appraisal Waiver Programs ICAP along with 36 other industry groups signed a letter to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs to raise concern over the new appraisal waiver programs recently implemented by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (the “Government Sponsored Enterprises.”) The letter states that these programs will create unnecessary and unacceptable risks for taxpayers and homeowners, and they come at a time when markets are at all-time highs &#8211; when risk mitigation should be tantamount. The&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns">Appraisal Waiver Programs&#8230; A Risky Business</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15301</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Appraisal De Minimis Proposal</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFIEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paperwork Reduction Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposal To Increase The Appraisal Threshold On Commercial Real Estate Loans The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Joint Report to Congress said the federal banking agencies are developing a proposal to increase the threshold for requiring an appraisal on commercial real estate loans from $250,000 to $400,000. The report did not propose changes to the current residential real estate threshold of $250,000. In addition, the agencies recognize that appraisals can provide protection to consumers by helping to assure the residential purchaser that the value of the property supports the mortgage amount assumed. Overall, the agencies believe that the interests of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase">Commercial Appraisal De Minimis Proposal</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14011</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should CU be Transparent?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FNMA’s CU is causing a BIG industry ruckus. Opinions are fragmented, being posted across multiple message boards and blogs. Please complete the attached survey created by ICAP member Keith Wolf, SRA, AI-RRS so we can tabulate the responses and distribute to all. We are reaching out across the country, so please feel free to forward the survey. The survey will remain open until January 31, 2015. The Appraisal Industry as a consolidated group thanks everyone for their participation in completing the survey. This survey has expired surveymonkey.com/s/S6DDVJN</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/">Should CU be Transparent?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6908</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to UAD Data</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to Data They Provided Through the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) Fellow appraiser, I am asking that you to take a moment to participate in this important industry effort. Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU) will be available in the first half of 2015. The CU performs automated risk assessment of appraisals submitted to the Uniform Collateral Data Portal based on information that you provided through the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD). The CU provides a risk score, flags, and messages to the lender. The GSE’s have mandated that all appraisals be submitted in the UAD format; however, currently&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/">Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to UAD Data</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6692</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Letter to ASB</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Statement Letter to the ASB The purpose of USPAP is to promote and maintain a high level of public trust in establishing requirements for appraisals and &#8220;reliable&#8221; valuations. The problems is, however, that it is subjective. Assuming one can support the conclusion or opinion; beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or in this case, the appraiser. Likewise, evaluation and selection is in the eye of the appraiser &#8211; which is why two different and reasonable and competent appraisers can reach two different, but equally credible opinions, on the same property. And that is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/">My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Letter to ASB</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4929</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASC &#8220;Refer My Appraisal Complaint&#8221; Website</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/asc-refer-my-appraisal-complaint-website-is-up-and-running/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/asc-refer-my-appraisal-complaint-website-is-up-and-running/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal hotline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ASC &#8220;Refer My Appraisal Complaint&#8221; Website is Up and Running The ASC&#8217;s new Refer My Appraisal Complaint website and hotline are up and running.  Here is the link to the website: https://refermyappraisalcomplaint.asc.gov/ I would suggest you all take a second and read this site&#8217;s Homepage direction to consumers and maybe you will understand why the Federal Government is so deeply in debt. This is a silly attempt by the ASC to project an image of consumer protection when in essence it is nothing more than a buck passing platform to the appropriate State Licensing Agency.  It even goes so far as&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/asc-refer-my-appraisal-complaint-website-is-up-and-running/">ASC &#8220;Refer My Appraisal Complaint&#8221; Website</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/asc-refer-my-appraisal-complaint-website-is-up-and-running/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4338</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AQB Releases December 2012 Q&#038;As</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/aqb-releases-december-2012-qas/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/aqb-releases-december-2012-qas/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>TJ&#8217;s Rant&#8230; Almost all of the questions deal with Supervisor &#8211; Trainee issues that will change in 2015. If like me, you believe it is difficult enough to find people to become appraisers today, just wait until you read all of the new requirements. I don&#8217;t understand where the AQB is coming from with all these new requirements. Do they really believe that someone will want to go to college (at an average cost of about $120,000) to get a degree and then become a Certified Residential appraiser who would be lucky to make $20,000 for their first few years&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/aqb-releases-december-2012-qas/">AQB Releases December 2012 Q&amp;As</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/aqb-releases-december-2012-qas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3779</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Trial Membership to ICAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/free-trial-membship-to-icap/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/free-trial-membship-to-icap/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAP, the Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals, works hard for you to monitor and make positive changes to Illinois State appraisal law. In an effort to enhance its membership and visibility ICAP has developed a special promotion offering a FREE no-risk trial membership. The FREE trial will allow non-members to receive all the same benefits as paid members through the first quarter of 2013, including: 1. A strong voice in Springfield with membership of over 1,800 appraisers 2. Legislative Alerts and Updates 3. Access to ICAP’s Career Center 4. ICAP Discounts on events and educational Offerings 5. Participation in ICAP’s&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/free-trial-membship-to-icap/">Free Trial Membership to ICAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/free-trial-membship-to-icap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3655</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Appraisers and AMC Survey</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/texas-appraisers-and-appraisal-management-company-survey/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/texas-appraisers-and-appraisal-management-company-survey/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In August 2012, the Texas Appraisers and Appraisal Management Survey surveyed a total of 1,584 appraisers and 55 appraisal management companies doing business in the state of Texas. The questions were specifically designed to achieve the following: Clearly distinguish between the fees paid to appraisers by Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) and fees paid by non-AMC clients for residential appraisals. Capture any difference in fees paid by property type: single family, condominium, size or square footage, or other factors. Capture the impact on fees by market area or locale: urban vs. rural, (MSAs, county, zip code, etc.). Determine whether appraiser qualifications&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/texas-appraisers-and-appraisal-management-company-survey/">Texas Appraisers and AMC Survey</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/texas-appraisers-and-appraisal-management-company-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3612</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UAD Update for Condos Without Unit number</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uad-update-for-condos-without-unit-number/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uad-update-for-condos-without-unit-number/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Condos without unit number Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have added a new requirement for condo reports (form 1073/1075) in the updated UAD Appendix D, issued June 19, 2012 (see below): Unit # The appraiser must enter the address unit number/designator. During the appraisal process if an appraiser determines that a unit number is not available for a property known to be a condominium, the appraiser must put a “-“ in the unit number field. The &#8220;-&#8221; symbolizes that the appraiser has researched the property address and was unable to identify a unit # for the given condominium unit. This&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uad-update-for-condos-without-unit-number/">UAD Update for Condos Without Unit number</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uad-update-for-condos-without-unit-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2934</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the 2012 USPAP has a new development and reporting requirement? Effective January 1, 2012; when exposure time is a component of the definition for the value opinion being developed, the appraiser must also develop and state in the report an opinion of reasonable exposure time linked to that value opinion. The following is the exact language in the USPAP; DEFINITIONS Exposure Time: estimated length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/">Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2357</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMC’s Filing Complaints Against Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/amcs-filing-complaints-against-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/amcs-filing-complaints-against-appraisers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AMC’s are sending in complaints on appraisers&#8230; From ICAP &#8211; Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals &#8220;Good afternoon ICAP’ers, I am writing to our residential members regarding a growing problem that ICAP is concerned with regarding lenders and AMC’s filing complaints against appraisers. THE SETUP: You receive a call from a lender or an AMC who wants to talk to you about an appraisal assignment you recently completed for them. The call usually comes from the QC Department at the post closing stage of the loan. They start questioning you on your line item adjustments. All the comparables are on smaller&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/amcs-filing-complaints-against-appraisers/">AMC’s Filing Complaints Against Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/amcs-filing-complaints-against-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2268</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
