<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exposure Draft - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-draft/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 03:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>When ‘Protected’ Becomes Pressure: You Have Until July 27 to Object</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/when-protected-becomes-pressure-object-by-july-27/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/when-protected-becomes-pressure-object-by-july-27/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=33551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The new fair‑housing course weaponizes protected characteristics to pressure appraisers into outcome‑driven valuation, directly contradicting USPAP’s prohibition on advocacy. The Fair Housing Course Is Training You to Break USPAP. You Have Until July 27 to Say So. The Appraiser Qualifications Board&#8217;s Second Exposure Draft keeps a required course that pressures new appraisers to advocate an outcome based on protected characteristics. That is not fair housing. It is not lawful. And you can still stop it — but the comment window closes July 27. Let me say it plainly. We are being pushed — through licensing law and federal fair-housing regulation&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/bias-accusation-collapses-as-hud-clears-the-appraiser/"     class="crp_link post-33379"><span class="crp_title">Bias Accusation Collapses as HUD Clears the Appraiser</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> HUD just confirmed what the appraisal showed from day one: the accusation never had a pulse.&nbsp; If you read the&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-freed-from-dei-propaganda/"     class="crp_link post-32449"><span class="crp_title">Appraisers Freed from DEI Propaganda</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> This bold move immediately resulted in the removal of all appraisal bias propaganda from the official whitehouse.gov website.&nbsp; With a&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-typical-buyer-standard-in-the-fair-housing-era/"     class="crp_link post-33420"><span class="crp_title">USPAP’s Typical Buyer Standard in the Fair Housing Era</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The Irreconcilable Conflict Between USPAP's Typical Buyer Standard and the Current Fair Housing Compliance Regime. Retain this document as a&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/when-protected-becomes-pressure-object-by-july-27/">When ‘Protected’ Becomes Pressure: You Have Until July 27 to Object</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/when-protected-becomes-pressure-object-by-july-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">33551</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disparate Treatment and Impact in USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>USPAP has introduced the terms DISPARATE TREATMENT AND IMPACT in its 5th exposure draft. Disparate treatment and impact are bad for appraisers because they can damage the reputation of the profession, lead to legal and regulatory action, and negatively impact the success and viability of individual appraisers and their businesses. Disparate treatment occurs when an appraiser treats individuals or groups differently based on their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or other protected characteristics. This type of discrimination is illegal and can result in legal and regulatory action, as well as damage to the appraiser&#8217;s reputation and business. Disparate impact occurs when&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/when-protected-becomes-pressure-object-by-july-27/"     class="crp_link post-33551"><span class="crp_title">When ‘Protected’ Becomes Pressure: You Have Until&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The new fair‑housing course weaponizes protected characteristics to pressure appraisers into outcome‑driven valuation, directly contradicting USPAP’s prohibition on advocacy. The&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hit-pieces-n-diatribes-against-appraisers-based-on-census-tracts"     class="crp_link post-28022"><span class="crp_title">Diatribes Against Appraisers</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> What’s even more frustrating to me is none of the well-known appraiser organizations have offered any public rebuttal to any&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-filed-a-complaint-against-me/"     class="crp_link post-30011"><span class="crp_title">Fannie Mae Filed a Complaint Against Me</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> An appraiser shared the following with us which was posted on one of the appraisers’ groups. Fannie Mae filed a&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap">Disparate Treatment and Impact in USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Disparate-Treatment-and-Impact-in-USPAP.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29339</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AQB Initial Fair Housing Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mandatory completion of an initial fair housing course lasting 7 hours by January 1st 2025, as well as 4 additional hours every renewal cycle thereafter.&#160; Recently, the Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) has proposed new requirements for those looking to become an appraiser or renew their certification/license. These include mandatory completion of an initial fair housing course lasting seven hours by January 1st 2025, as well as four additional hours every renewal cycle thereafter if this becomes standard practice. The following is taken right out of the new exposure draft on real property appraiser qualifications criteria. &#8220;The core goal is to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/truisms-taxes-death-n-anti-bias-training"     class="crp_link post-25226"><span class="crp_title">Truisms - Taxes, Death... and Bias Training</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...other states will also modify their appraisal license renewal CE class requirements to include some form of anti-bias training... Folks,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/politicians-have-made-appraising-into-a-nightmare-so-i-have-retired"     class="crp_link post-25786"><span class="crp_title">I've Retired & I'm So Glad I Did</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> &nbsp;What we got, was 30+ years of complaints from the lenders and politicians who blamed appraisers for all of the&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/marin-city-discrimination-case-settled"     class="crp_link post-28900"><span class="crp_title">Marin City Discrimination Case Settled</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> It’s unfortunate that this case was SETTLED in the way it was, because in reality, nothing about racial discrimination and&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course">AQB Initial Fair Housing Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AQB-Initial-Fair-Housing-Course.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29060</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed update of professional guidelines for property appraisals contains confusing language about what constitutes discrimination, and would even suggest appraisers could engage in “ethical” discrimination.&#160; Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators. I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/two-cheers-4-an-evolved-beltway-entrepreneur-david-bunton"     class="crp_link post-28699"><span class="crp_title">Two Cheers for an 'Evolved' Beltway Entrepreneur...&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> We come not to bury David Bunton, the public figure, but to praise David Bunton, the evolved Beltway organism. Who&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section"     class="crp_link post-27505"><span class="crp_title">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-countersuing-black-homeowners-4-defamation"     class="crp_link post-28363"><span class="crp_title">Appraiser Countersuing Black Homeowners for Defamation</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The Maryland appraiser has filed a countersuit against the homeowners, claiming defamation.&nbsp; Appraisers, there have been several lawsuits filed against&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition">Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Confusing-Language-for-USPAP-Ethics-Rule-Addition.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, should we include discussion of B&#38;D in our reports? Wait, What?? Bondage and Discipline? No, not that. Bias and Discrimination. Yes, it must be addressed very clearly. Now, before you blow a cork or throw your mouse at the computer screen, let’s examine what’s really been impacting ‘us’ for the past 4 plus years. One of our peers, who’s become somewhat famous for the way articles are written about appraisal and other topics, had a recent article ‘rebroadcasted’ in AppraisersBlogs, FTX Bought Government&#8217;s Silence; Did Fintechs Buy Attacks on Appraisers? A statement in that article exposes some of what has&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/preference-falsification-why-licensees-parrot-notions-they-know-are-untrue"     class="crp_link post-28127"><span class="crp_title">'Preference Falsification' - Why Licensees Parrot&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Preference falsification has resulted in some appraisers parroting talking points they know to be untrue.&nbsp; People who live under authoritarian&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hit-pieces-n-diatribes-against-appraisers-based-on-census-tracts"     class="crp_link post-28022"><span class="crp_title">Diatribes Against Appraisers</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> What’s even more frustrating to me is none of the well-known appraiser organizations have offered any public rebuttal to any&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uncovering-flaws-in-fha-appraisal-n-loan-review-process/"     class="crp_link post-31044"><span class="crp_title">Uncovering Flaws in FHA Appraisal & Loan Review Process</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The story of this single mother's harrowing experience with a defective home purchase and HUD's negligent oversight exposes deep flaws&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports">Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28183</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baltimore Racial Bias Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When reading over the Baltimore document, it appears painfully clear (to me) that there is a competency issue exposed. Folks, below is the Baltimore court paperwork for the latest appraiser bias suit that recently ‘hit the fan.’ This document is fairly specific, in that it reveals quite a lot about the two appraisals performed, including the home locations for the ‘comps’ used. The attorneys representing the plaintiffs are from the same Washington, D.C. firm that The Appraisal Foundation hired to examine USPAP. That firm was the one which has provided new ‘discrimination avoidance’ verbiage being considered in the USPAP Third&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hit-pieces-n-diatribes-against-appraisers-based-on-census-tracts"     class="crp_link post-28022"><span class="crp_title">Diatribes Against Appraisers</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> What’s even more frustrating to me is none of the well-known appraiser organizations have offered any public rebuttal to any&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/promoting-false-racist-appraiser-narrative-2-optimize-profits-via-avms"     class="crp_link post-26499"><span class="crp_title">Promoting False "Racist Appraiser" Narrative</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Some Lenders promoting false "racist appraiser" narrative to optimize profits via AVMs Like most businesses lenders want to optimize their&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-filed-a-complaint-against-me/"     class="crp_link post-30011"><span class="crp_title">Fannie Mae Filed a Complaint Against Me</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> An appraiser shared the following with us which was posted on one of the appraisers’ groups. Fannie Mae filed a&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit">Baltimore Racial Bias Lawsuit</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27655</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Future editions of USPAP will have an effective start date but no end date. Folks, on Thursday August 11, 2022, the ASB/TAF announced the extension of the current USPAP to the end of 2023. Assuming that a ‘new’ USPAP is formally approved in time, the next issue of USPAP will become effective January 1, 2024. But here’s the interesting wrinkle about this, which I admit I missed in their 8/11/22 announcement: &#8220;How long is the current version of USPAP effective? With this announcement, the 2020-21 USPAP will now have an effective date through December 31, 2023. This is an additional&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/taf-is-making-appraisers-pay-2-b-misleading-n-exposed-2-legal-jeopardy"     class="crp_link post-27460"><span class="crp_title">TAF Charging for Misleading Classes</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> From the organization that brought you the bat-shit crazy letter and the chickenshit letter, they are charging for classes that are misleading. ASC&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-absurdity-zero-value-2-appraisers-or-the-public"     class="crp_link post-27076"><span class="crp_title">USPAP Absurdity</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> From one of my appraiser colleagues in NYC on a McKissock class, taught by Dan Bradley, husband of Michelle Bradley&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit"     class="crp_link post-27655"><span class="crp_title">Baltimore Racial Bias Lawsuit</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> When reading over the Baltimore document, it appears painfully clear (to me) that there is a competency issue exposed. Folks,&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap">No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27611</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Third Exposure Draft</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks, the Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board released the THIRD Exposure Draft to USPAP on July 26, 2022. To be honest, I didn’t know there have been two previous Exposure Drafts. I would encourage you to download and print this Draft here. The PDF is also embedded below. It’s only 11 pages total. The key difference in this Draft is that the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. You&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-unconstitutional-per-2-appraisers"     class="crp_link post-20897"><span class="crp_title">USPAP is Unconstitutional?</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Gerald McNamara and Colleen Kudrick were admonished by the board in a five-count takedown. There is a lot of nuances&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-new-definition-inviting-problems-not-protecting-public-trust"     class="crp_link post-23567"><span class="crp_title">New "Misleading" Definition Inviting Problems</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> I perused the latest copy of USPAP and saw a new definition on the list: Misleading. While I appreciate the&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-definitions-of-his-n-her-the-new-misleading-debacle"     class="crp_link post-25976"><span class="crp_title">USPAP Definitions of 'His' and 'Her'</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The USPAP Exposure Draft Process Continues To Step Outside Their Purpose With Her / Him as the new ‘Misleading’ Debacle&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27505</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, if your license renews in 2022, you will need to take the ‘new’ USPAP 7hr Update course. See below. The Update class you have already taken for the 2020-21 book, which has been extended to Dec. 31, 2022, cannot be used for CE credit again. However, I’m somewhat confused as to the effective dates of this ‘new’ Update class. It says “2022-23” which implies it will be valid through the end of (or into?) 2023. But the ‘current’ USPAP is presently undergoing Exposure Drafts for the proposed changes, which will be effective as of Jan. 1, 2023.  Normally, the Update&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers"     class="crp_link post-25012"><span class="crp_title">Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The Appraisal Foundation has issued an exposure draft for Advisory Opinion (AO) 16. Advisory Opinion 16 is Fair Housing Laws:&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud"     class="crp_link post-29449"><span class="crp_title">The New & Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-take-out-the-junk-amc-practices-exposed/"     class="crp_link post-34945"><span class="crp_title">It’s Time to Take Out the Junk: AMC Practices Exposed</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Appraisers have spent years carrying the weight of broken AMC practices, and this article pulls every one of those practices&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course">2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation has issued an exposure draft for Advisory Opinion (AO) 16. Advisory Opinion 16 is Fair Housing Laws: Avoiding Bias in Real Property Appraisal and Appraisal Review Development and Reporting. Unlike other exposure drafts, the text of the AO opinion has been rewritten. The traditional strike through of word or phrase changes is nonexistent. The Appraisal Foundation acknowledges “the Advisory Opinion was extensively rewritten”. Comments on the changes are due to The Appraisal Foundation by March 31, 2021 via SurveyMonkey or email, asb@appraisalfoundation.org. Although an Advisory Opinion is not a standard of practice, it does express what is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/passing-state-laws-mandating-fair-housing-continuing-education-4-appraisers"     class="crp_link post-24999"><span class="crp_title">Blaming, Punishing Appraisers in State Laws</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Will the same states that do this for appraisers also mandate similar Fair Housing and Fair Lending courses for lenders,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-filed-a-complaint-against-me/"     class="crp_link post-30011"><span class="crp_title">Fannie Mae Filed a Complaint Against Me</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> An appraiser shared the following with us which was posted on one of the appraisers’ groups. Fannie Mae filed a&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/how-rural-america-lost-its-mortgage-lifeline/"     class="crp_link post-33012"><span class="crp_title">The Town With No Bank: How Rural America Lost Its&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> For decades, we’ve been told that the problem is demand. That people don’t want to live in rural America anymore.&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers">Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25012</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board have released the 4th Exposure Draft to the FUTURE version (2022-23) of USPAP. I, like so many other ‘stakeholders’ and appraisers, have grown weary of the incessant Exposure Drafts and updates to our mandated PROTOCOL MANUAL, which for many years has been massaged and modified in various ways every 2 years. Largely because new members cycle onto the ASB every year or two. The constant updates has resulted into a continuing cash cow for the Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board. But in actual use, that should not happen because USPAP is codified&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/asc-end-the-foolishness-n-federalize-appraisal-regulation-n-enforcement"     class="crp_link post-24719"><span class="crp_title">ASC, End the Foolishness Now</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> End the constant ‘busy work’ USPAP updates. End the catering to lenders or ‘advisory’ councils. Appraisers are NOT supposed to&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section"     class="crp_link post-27505"><span class="crp_title">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud"     class="crp_link post-29449"><span class="crp_title">The New & Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes">Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Mueller Report has surfaced. The report is a Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report and it was given to an appraiser as a sample. This one raises more questions than the last one! The photos from the property inspection do not tell the appraiser one thing. The photos are dark and the repairs the inspector states are needed, simply are not seen in the photos. It begs the question, does the appraiser have adequate information to complete a credible appraisal? Now take a look at the Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal report. Pull up the report and follow along. Some things have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/sample-mueller-bifurcated-appraisal-report"     class="crp_link post-21145"><span class="crp_title">Mueller Sample Report. You Decide!</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> A recruiter for Mueller Services, Inc. (Mueller Reports) contacted a VaCAP member about joining their team as a W-2 employee&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-hybrids-inflated-indicated-value-n-pittance-pay"     class="crp_link post-20923"><span class="crp_title">I'd Be Better off at McDonalds</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...they provide no documentation as to how their algorithm produces this indicated value... I had to "jump in the pool"&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/let-appraisers-hire-n-train-inspector-personnel-4-desktop-appraisals"     class="crp_link post-21210"><span class="crp_title">Let Appraisers Train Their Own Inspectors</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> If we are to make a third party inspector liable for the data they provide... FNMA's recent newsletter states that&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP">Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21229</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, don’t toss your reading bifocals in the wastebasket just yet. Apparently, there were so many negative issues with the THIRD exposure draft to the 2020-21 version of USPAP, that the ASB jettisoned it, and will move forward with a FOURTH draft. Everyone should be on their toes, ready to peruse this stellar document when it is released not long from now! Can’t we, please, establish a set of reliable and understandable procedures, and leave them in place for 5 years minimum? Please! Here’s the announcement issued on February 8, 2019, after the ASB meeting in Scottsdale, AZ: (From the Appraisal Foundation)&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/how-rural-america-lost-its-mortgage-lifeline/"     class="crp_link post-33012"><span class="crp_title">The Town With No Bank: How Rural America Lost Its&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> For decades, we’ve been told that the problem is demand. That people don’t want to live in rural America anymore.&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud"     class="crp_link post-29449"><span class="crp_title">The New & Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uncovering-flaws-in-fha-appraisal-n-loan-review-process/"     class="crp_link post-31044"><span class="crp_title">Uncovering Flaws in FHA Appraisal & Loan Review Process</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The story of this single mother's harrowing experience with a defective home purchase and HUD's negligent oversight exposes deep flaws&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft">Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20938</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Algorithms are everywhere&#8230; “Algorithms decide who gets a loan, who gets a job interview, who gets insurance and much more — but they don’t automatically make things fair. Mathematician and data scientist Cathy O’Neil coined a term for algorithms that are secret, important and harmful: “weapons of math destruction.” Learn more about the hidden agendas behind the formulas.” &#8220;Algorithms are opinions embedded in code. It&#8217;s really different from what you think most people think of algorithms. They think algorithms are objective and true and scientific. That&#8217;s a marketing trick. It&#8217;s also a marketing trick to intimidate you with algorithms, to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-process-bifurcation-beneficiaries"     class="crp_link post-20729"><span class="crp_title">Shifting Narrative of Appraisal Modernization</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...the reasoning for changing the appraisal process has shifted... Is there are Crisis? Rahm Emanuel eloquently stated “You never let&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers"     class="crp_link post-20713"><span class="crp_title">Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The current and proposed revised version of USPAP also opens the door to increased regulatory persecution of licensed and certified&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/how-2-destroy-the-appraisal-profession-government-101"     class="crp_link post-26831"><span class="crp_title">How to Destroy the Appraisal Profession</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Anytime the government gets involved in an issue, it tends to have more adverse effects than positive ones. It makes&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction">What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20836</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The current and proposed revised version of USPAP also opens the door to increased regulatory persecution of licensed and certified real estate appraisers, while leaving all others that opine about values with no constraints, rules or limitations. I was recently asked to consider a proposed change to USPAP. As received in my email: “Also this, in the 3rd exposure draft 239 The appraiser is not required to title an appraisal report using specific terminology because 240 USPAP compliance is measured by the substantive content of a report, not by what the 241 report is called. The use of labels such as analysis,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-ASB-challenge-USPAP-57-flavors"     class="crp_link post-16441"><span class="crp_title">TAF / ASB Challenge USPAP</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> 30 days after implementation of the last changes, ASB/TAF is already admitting they think the current USPAP is inadequate and&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-appraisal-fee-debate-exposing-the-amc-fee-deception/"     class="crp_link post-31465"><span class="crp_title">The Great Debate on Appraisal Fees</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> She included several different fee split examples indicating AMCs retained as much as 70 percent of the total appraisal fee&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/how-rural-america-lost-its-mortgage-lifeline/"     class="crp_link post-33012"><span class="crp_title">The Town With No Bank: How Rural America Lost Its&hellip;</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> For decades, we’ve been told that the problem is demand. That people don’t want to live in rural America anymore.&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers">Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20713</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Take on Washington DC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids were a big topic &#038; many regulators are concerned about their compliance&#8230; Independent Fee appraisers representing 15 different states were well represented in Washington DC this past weekend. Appraisers from  Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Ohio, Louisiana, California, Illinois, South Dakota, Michigan, Utah, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland and Washington State joined together in DC for several gatherings. To sum it up simply&#8230; Positive Unity among all. On Friday, three members of VaCAP attended the Appraisal Standards Board Meeting. This meeting was live streamed, so hopefully you were able to watch live. Lots of discussions on the proposed changes to the 2020-2021&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/corrupt-west-virginia-real-estate-licensing-board-scheme-ends"     class="crp_link post-27301"><span class="crp_title">West Virginia Appraisal Board Scheme</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The Doomed Quest to Reform a corrupt West Virginia Licensing Board “Board members earn money working for a law firm&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uncovering-flaws-in-fha-appraisal-n-loan-review-process/"     class="crp_link post-31044"><span class="crp_title">Uncovering Flaws in FHA Appraisal & Loan Review Process</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The story of this single mother's harrowing experience with a defective home purchase and HUD's negligent oversight exposes deep flaws&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-take-out-the-junk-amc-practices-exposed/"     class="crp_link post-34945"><span class="crp_title">It’s Time to Take Out the Junk: AMC Practices Exposed</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Appraisers have spent years carrying the weight of broken AMC practices, and this article pulls every one of those practices&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together">Appraisers Take on Washington DC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19637</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is&#8230; Folks, the Second Exposure Draft of proposed changes to the next USPAP was released by the Appraisal Standards Board on August 23. See embedded PDF below. The ASB is encouraging all users to review this document, and provide commentary back to them on/before October 10, 2018. One item of note is there is a proposal in the Draft to do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is. If it’s not an ‘appraisal’, what is it?? Currently we have “Appraisal Report”&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap"     class="crp_link post-27611"><span class="crp_title">No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Future editions of USPAP will have an effective start date but no end date. Folks, on Thursday August 11, 2022,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud"     class="crp_link post-29449"><span class="crp_title">The New & Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-typical-buyer-standard-in-the-fair-housing-era/"     class="crp_link post-33420"><span class="crp_title">USPAP’s Typical Buyer Standard in the Fair Housing Era</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The Irreconcilable Conflict Between USPAP's Typical Buyer Standard and the Current Fair Housing Compliance Regime. Retain this document as a&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft">If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At or During?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“At the time of assignment” refers to the time period commencing&#8230; Last month, the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) provided the ‘first draft’ of the proposed changes to the 2020-21 USPAP, which I circulated. One of the points they mentioned is a goal to make USPAP easier to read and more understandable. OK, commendable. Then on June 27, 2018, the Appraisal Foundation and the ASB released the latest USPAP Q&#38;A “suggestions.” (The USPAP Q&#38;A&#8217;s, AO&#8217;s, and FAQ&#8217;s are not directives, or even a ‘legal’ part of USPAP. Instead, they offer independent commentary on how a particular issue could be handled or solved, but may&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud"     class="crp_link post-29449"><span class="crp_title">The New & Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-filed-a-complaint-against-me/"     class="crp_link post-30011"><span class="crp_title">Fannie Mae Filed a Complaint Against Me</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> An appraiser shared the following with us which was posted on one of the appraisers’ groups. Fannie Mae filed a&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-take-out-the-junk-amc-practices-exposed/"     class="crp_link post-34945"><span class="crp_title">It’s Time to Take Out the Junk: AMC Practices Exposed</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Appraisers have spent years carrying the weight of broken AMC practices, and this article pulls every one of those practices&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period">At or During?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18572</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately there has been a push for bifurcated (hybrid) appraisal products. Those promoting these questionable products claim it will reduce the amount of time to obtain an appraisal. Most appraisers are screaming foul play, and for good reason. It is because of bad players doing questionable things that licensing became mandatory in Virginia. Mandatory. Licensing of appraisers protects the public trust. We all know splitting the process will not save time, but rather create delays. The only reason for this questionable product is the profit of the amc, nothing more. And then there is the quality of the information being&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/rationalizing-accepting-low-fee-hybrids"     class="crp_link post-18153"><span class="crp_title">$50 to $100 Hybrids?</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> Here’s the sales pitch being sent to appraisers: MCSV is currently offering a distinct hybrid product to our clients that&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisals-liability-risks"     class="crp_link post-18073"><span class="crp_title">Liability Risks of Hybrid Appraisals</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> "Hybrid Appraisals" - Speaking about the Liability Risks to Appraisers and Others at The Appraisal Foundation's Joint Council Meeting "Hybrid&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-liable-4-information-hybrids"     class="crp_link post-18174"><span class="crp_title">100% Liability for Information Relied Upon</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...courts have ruled if the information is included in the report and relied upon, the appraiser is responsible for the&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals">Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18387</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers get frustrated with the constant changes and revisions every two years&#8230; Folks, attached is the 1st Exposure Draft of changes to the NEXT “bible” of our industry. Read this over and then send in your comments per the instructions. With this draft, the ASB is desiring to simplify much of the document to make it easier to read and understand. There are numerous proposed edits you’ll see when you read it. They explain their rationale for the changes. This is appreciated. I’m also glad to see they have added to the Definitions the words “State” and “Summarize” which have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<div class="crp_related     crp-text-only">
<h4>Related Posts:</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-appraisal-fee-debate-exposing-the-amc-fee-deception/"     class="crp_link post-31465"><span class="crp_title">The Great Debate on Appraisal Fees</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> She included several different fee split examples indicating AMCs retained as much as 70 percent of the total appraisal fee&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section"     class="crp_link post-27505"><span class="crp_title">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> ...the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks,&hellip;</span></li>
<li><a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uncovering-flaws-in-fha-appraisal-n-loan-review-process/"     class="crp_link post-31044"><span class="crp_title">Uncovering Flaws in FHA Appraisal & Loan Review Process</span></a><span class="crp_excerpt"> The story of this single mother's harrowing experience with a defective home purchase and HUD's negligent oversight exposes deep flaws&hellip;</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="crp_clear"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years">Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18273</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
