<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exposure Draft - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-draft/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 04:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Disparate Treatment and Impact in USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>USPAP has introduced the terms DISPARATE TREATMENT AND IMPACT in its 5th exposure draft. Disparate treatment and impact are bad for appraisers because they can damage the reputation of the profession, lead to legal and regulatory action, and negatively impact the success and viability of individual appraisers and their businesses. Disparate treatment occurs when an appraiser treats individuals or groups differently based on their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or other protected characteristics. This type of discrimination is illegal and can result in legal and regulatory action, as well as damage to the appraiser&#8217;s reputation and business. Disparate impact occurs when&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap">Disparate Treatment and Impact in USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/disparate-treatment-n-impact-in-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Disparate-Treatment-and-Impact-in-USPAP.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29339</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AQB Initial Fair Housing Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mandatory completion of an initial fair housing course lasting 7 hours by January 1st 2025, as well as 4 additional hours every renewal cycle thereafter.&#160; Recently, the Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) has proposed new requirements for those looking to become an appraiser or renew their certification/license. These include mandatory completion of an initial fair housing course lasting seven hours by January 1st 2025, as well as four additional hours every renewal cycle thereafter if this becomes standard practice. The following is taken right out of the new exposure draft on real property appraiser qualifications criteria. &#8220;The core goal is to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course">AQB Initial Fair Housing Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/aqb-initial-fair-housing-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AQB-Initial-Fair-Housing-Course.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29060</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed update of professional guidelines for property appraisals contains confusing language about what constitutes discrimination, and would even suggest appraisers could engage in “ethical” discrimination.&#160; Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators. I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition">Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Confusing-Language-for-USPAP-Ethics-Rule-Addition.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, should we include discussion of B&#38;D in our reports? Wait, What?? Bondage and Discipline? No, not that. Bias and Discrimination. Yes, it must be addressed very clearly. Now, before you blow a cork or throw your mouse at the computer screen, let’s examine what’s really been impacting ‘us’ for the past 4 plus years. One of our peers, who’s become somewhat famous for the way articles are written about appraisal and other topics, had a recent article ‘rebroadcasted’ in AppraisersBlogs, FTX Bought Government&#8217;s Silence; Did Fintechs Buy Attacks on Appraisers? A statement in that article exposes some of what has&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports">Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28183</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baltimore Racial Bias Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When reading over the Baltimore document, it appears painfully clear (to me) that there is a competency issue exposed. Folks, below is the Baltimore court paperwork for the latest appraiser bias suit that recently ‘hit the fan.’ This document is fairly specific, in that it reveals quite a lot about the two appraisals performed, including the home locations for the ‘comps’ used. The attorneys representing the plaintiffs are from the same Washington, D.C. firm that The Appraisal Foundation hired to examine USPAP. That firm was the one which has provided new ‘discrimination avoidance’ verbiage being considered in the USPAP Third&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit">Baltimore Racial Bias Lawsuit</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/baltimore-racial-bias-lawsuit-the-latest-appraiser-bias-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27655</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Future editions of USPAP will have an effective start date but no end date. Folks, on Thursday August 11, 2022, the ASB/TAF announced the extension of the current USPAP to the end of 2023. Assuming that a ‘new’ USPAP is formally approved in time, the next issue of USPAP will become effective January 1, 2024. But here’s the interesting wrinkle about this, which I admit I missed in their 8/11/22 announcement: &#8220;How long is the current version of USPAP effective? With this announcement, the 2020-21 USPAP will now have an effective date through December 31, 2023. This is an additional&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap">No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27611</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Third Exposure Draft</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks, the Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board released the THIRD Exposure Draft to USPAP on July 26, 2022. To be honest, I didn’t know there have been two previous Exposure Drafts. I would encourage you to download and print this Draft here. The PDF is also embedded below. It’s only 11 pages total. The key difference in this Draft is that the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. You&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27505</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, if your license renews in 2022, you will need to take the ‘new’ USPAP 7hr Update course. See below. The Update class you have already taken for the 2020-21 book, which has been extended to Dec. 31, 2022, cannot be used for CE credit again. However, I’m somewhat confused as to the effective dates of this ‘new’ Update class. It says “2022-23” which implies it will be valid through the end of (or into?) 2023. But the ‘current’ USPAP is presently undergoing Exposure Drafts for the proposed changes, which will be effective as of Jan. 1, 2023.  Normally, the Update&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course">2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation has issued an exposure draft for Advisory Opinion (AO) 16. Advisory Opinion 16 is Fair Housing Laws: Avoiding Bias in Real Property Appraisal and Appraisal Review Development and Reporting. Unlike other exposure drafts, the text of the AO opinion has been rewritten. The traditional strike through of word or phrase changes is nonexistent. The Appraisal Foundation acknowledges “the Advisory Opinion was extensively rewritten”. Comments on the changes are due to The Appraisal Foundation by March 31, 2021 via SurveyMonkey or email, asb@appraisalfoundation.org. Although an Advisory Opinion is not a standard of practice, it does express what is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers">Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25012</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board have released the 4th Exposure Draft to the FUTURE version (2022-23) of USPAP. I, like so many other ‘stakeholders’ and appraisers, have grown weary of the incessant Exposure Drafts and updates to our mandated PROTOCOL MANUAL, which for many years has been massaged and modified in various ways every 2 years. Largely because new members cycle onto the ASB every year or two. The constant updates has resulted into a continuing cash cow for the Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board. But in actual use, that should not happen because USPAP is codified&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes">Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Mueller Report has surfaced. The report is a Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report and it was given to an appraiser as a sample. This one raises more questions than the last one! The photos from the property inspection do not tell the appraiser one thing. The photos are dark and the repairs the inspector states are needed, simply are not seen in the photos. It begs the question, does the appraiser have adequate information to complete a credible appraisal? Now take a look at the Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal report. Pull up the report and follow along. Some things have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP">Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21229</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, don’t toss your reading bifocals in the wastebasket just yet. Apparently, there were so many negative issues with the THIRD exposure draft to the 2020-21 version of USPAP, that the ASB jettisoned it, and will move forward with a FOURTH draft. Everyone should be on their toes, ready to peruse this stellar document when it is released not long from now! Can’t we, please, establish a set of reliable and understandable procedures, and leave them in place for 5 years minimum? Please! Here’s the announcement issued on February 8, 2019, after the ASB meeting in Scottsdale, AZ: (From the Appraisal Foundation)&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft">Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20938</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Algorithms are everywhere&#8230; “Algorithms decide who gets a loan, who gets a job interview, who gets insurance and much more — but they don’t automatically make things fair. Mathematician and data scientist Cathy O’Neil coined a term for algorithms that are secret, important and harmful: “weapons of math destruction.” Learn more about the hidden agendas behind the formulas.” &#8220;Algorithms are opinions embedded in code. It&#8217;s really different from what you think most people think of algorithms. They think algorithms are objective and true and scientific. That&#8217;s a marketing trick. It&#8217;s also a marketing trick to intimidate you with algorithms, to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction">What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20836</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The current and proposed revised version of USPAP also opens the door to increased regulatory persecution of licensed and certified real estate appraisers, while leaving all others that opine about values with no constraints, rules or limitations. I was recently asked to consider a proposed change to USPAP. As received in my email: “Also this, in the 3rd exposure draft 239 The appraiser is not required to title an appraisal report using specific terminology because 240 USPAP compliance is measured by the substantive content of a report, not by what the 241 report is called. The use of labels such as analysis,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers">Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20713</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Take on Washington DC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids were a big topic &#038; many regulators are concerned about their compliance&#8230; Independent Fee appraisers representing 15 different states were well represented in Washington DC this past weekend. Appraisers from  Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Ohio, Louisiana, California, Illinois, South Dakota, Michigan, Utah, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland and Washington State joined together in DC for several gatherings. To sum it up simply&#8230; Positive Unity among all. On Friday, three members of VaCAP attended the Appraisal Standards Board Meeting. This meeting was live streamed, so hopefully you were able to watch live. Lots of discussions on the proposed changes to the 2020-2021&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together">Appraisers Take on Washington DC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19637</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is&#8230; Folks, the Second Exposure Draft of proposed changes to the next USPAP was released by the Appraisal Standards Board on August 23. See embedded PDF below. The ASB is encouraging all users to review this document, and provide commentary back to them on/before October 10, 2018. One item of note is there is a proposal in the Draft to do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is. If it’s not an ‘appraisal’, what is it?? Currently we have “Appraisal Report”&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft">If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At or During?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“At the time of assignment” refers to the time period commencing&#8230; Last month, the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) provided the ‘first draft’ of the proposed changes to the 2020-21 USPAP, which I circulated. One of the points they mentioned is a goal to make USPAP easier to read and more understandable. OK, commendable. Then on June 27, 2018, the Appraisal Foundation and the ASB released the latest USPAP Q&#38;A “suggestions.” (The USPAP Q&#38;A&#8217;s, AO&#8217;s, and FAQ&#8217;s are not directives, or even a ‘legal’ part of USPAP. Instead, they offer independent commentary on how a particular issue could be handled or solved, but may&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period">At or During?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18572</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately there has been a push for bifurcated (hybrid) appraisal products. Those promoting these questionable products claim it will reduce the amount of time to obtain an appraisal. Most appraisers are screaming foul play, and for good reason. It is because of bad players doing questionable things that licensing became mandatory in Virginia. Mandatory. Licensing of appraisers protects the public trust. We all know splitting the process will not save time, but rather create delays. The only reason for this questionable product is the profit of the amc, nothing more. And then there is the quality of the information being&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals">Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18387</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers get frustrated with the constant changes and revisions every two years&#8230; Folks, attached is the 1st Exposure Draft of changes to the NEXT “bible” of our industry. Read this over and then send in your comments per the instructions. With this draft, the ASB is desiring to simplify much of the document to make it easier to read and understand. There are numerous proposed edits you’ll see when you read it. They explain their rationale for the changes. This is appreciated. I’m also glad to see they have added to the Definitions the words “State” and “Summarize” which have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years">Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18273</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Action Reminders</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-topics-pay-attention</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-topics-pay-attention#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounts receivables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topics getting a lot of attention&#8230; Life can be hectic around this time of the year and we wanted to remind everyone of a few items that need your attention and action: First: The AQB has another exposure draft out concerning appraiser licensing qualifications. The big issues are Degree Requirements, Alternative Tracks, Practical Applications and Experience Requirements. These topics have been getting a lot of attention as the &#8220;perceived appraiser shortage&#8221; card is being played by lenders and AMCs. Please take a few minutes and share your thoughts. The exposure draft and comment instructions can be found here. VaCAP urges every appraiser to comment on these topics. The deadline&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-topics-pay-attention">Action Reminders</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-topics-pay-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16037</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
