<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Appraisal Quality Monitoring - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-quality-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-quality-monitoring/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 02:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>The New &#038; Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 12:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TALCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally known as Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU), and subsequently Collateral Underwriter 2.0 (CU-2)i this always dubious product of Fannie Mae is increasingly being referred to by some, if not many American Appraisers as The Fraudulator / Underwriter 2.0 (FU-2). To be clear it is not limited to the Collateral Underwriter (CU &#38; CU-2) software. The new Fraudulator (FU-2) combines the CU products with their numerous improper uses. The end result of which includes OUTRIGHT FRAUD being perpetrated against banks via the repurchase letters Fannie Mae now issues on a quota based system rather than because of legitimate appraisal defects.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud">The New &#038; Improved Fannie Mae “FRAUDULATOR 2.0”</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/the-new-improved-fannie-mae-fraudulator-2-is-an-outright-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/The-New-Improved-Fannie-Mae-FRAUDULATOR-2.0.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29449</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor &#8211; GSE Forms Revisions Coming?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GSE’s “really want your input” on the proposed revisions&#8230; Folks, Rumor has it that the GSE’s are ‘finally’ considering making revisions to the current appraisal report forms. I suspect there have been draft forms already produced, and possibly are actually being tested in a cave somewhere in the Appalachian Mountains wilderness or perhaps inside Yucca Mountain, Nevada. But rumor has it that the GSE’s “really want your input” on the proposed revisions. But how to do that is not revealed in the rumor. This is something to keep at least one eye observing over the next many weeks, months,or maybe&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored">Rumor &#8211; GSE Forms Revisions Coming?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17348</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collateral Underwriter Crumbles</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/cu-robot-collateral-underwriter</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/cu-robot-collateral-underwriter#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufactured home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CU Robot Keeps Score on Appraisers Appraisers, No, this is not about “cuukie” crumbles. It’s about what the Fannie Mae Collateral Underwriter (CU) process is finding in far too many appraisal reports. A few days ago, I had an opportunity to speak with someone on the &#8216;inside&#8217; of Fannie Mae. The discussion evolved to &#8220;what are the most serious items the CU process is finding in appraisals?&#8221; The CU process, which became effective January 26, 2015, is a giant electronic robot collecting tons of specific data from submitted appraisals to FNMA. This data can then be tied directly to the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/cu-robot-collateral-underwriter">Collateral Underwriter Crumbles</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/cu-robot-collateral-underwriter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12149</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collateral Underwriter, What’s Under the Hood?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/collateral-underwriter-under-hood</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/collateral-underwriter-under-hood#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedonic Regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=10980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Collateral Underwriter &#8211; Garbage In, Garbage Out (GIGO) FNMA has a fascination for first patenting garbage, &#38; then implementing it as policy! FNMA simply LIED! Collateral Underwriter IS an automated ‘appraisal review’ despite disclaimers. It was never intended as anything else. Read the patent application below. Before I get into the details, I want to ask each reader to forward this to every appraiser you know. This concerns FNMA’s patent of the seriously flawed techniques and underlying support for their Collateral Underwriter (CU) Risk Rating “System”. It’s time for appraisers to take action against the unreliable system which is unfairly&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/collateral-underwriter-under-hood">Collateral Underwriter, What’s Under the Hood?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/collateral-underwriter-under-hood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10980</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urban&#8230; or Suburban?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/urban-suburban-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/urban-suburban-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhood Characteristics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=10786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Difference between Urban and Suburban locations Appraisers, Last week, I asked your input regarding why in many cases appraisers check suburban in the Neighborhood Characteristics when often the subject’s location is actually an Urban area (at least from the definitions perspective below). The example I used was from an actual report. The subject property is located within a city of 90,000 population. It has typical urban services, including police and fire protection, utility water deliver and sewer service. It is surrounded by competing subdivisions, nearby shopping, colleges, city administrative offices and business buildings. It is also close to Interstate 5,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/urban-suburban-appraisals">Urban&#8230; or Suburban?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/urban-suburban-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10786</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adjustment Values, Frequency &#038; Dollar Amount</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustment-values-frequency-dollar-amount/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustment-values-frequency-dollar-amount/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered what other appraisers are doing with adjustment values? Appraisers, Have you ever wondered what other appraisers are doing with adjustments in their reports? CoreLogic has done research over the past 3 years, using 1.3 MILLION+ reports, and has produced the graph attached here.  You may want to print this for reference. This graph shows the percentage of time a certain feature is adjusted, and the average dollar amount of the adjustment for each of those. It’s rather interesting. The highest amount of adjustment, approximately $14,000, is for the Quality Rating. Not really surprising as to the amount, but the percentage&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustment-values-frequency-dollar-amount/">Adjustment Values, Frequency &#038; Dollar Amount</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustment-values-frequency-dollar-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9238</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dreaded FNMA Letter RE Condition Ratings</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/dreaded-fnma-letter-re-condition-ratings/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/dreaded-fnma-letter-re-condition-ratings/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Certified Letter From Fannie Mae Regarding Condition Ratings And then it happens, the moment we all know is coming &#8211; the dreaded certified letter from Fannie Mae. My door bell rings and the mailman is standing on my porch with pen in hand.  Now don’t get me wrong, we have all been warned. They have the super computer comparing all of us and if you are the outlier you’re getting notified!  If a majority of Appraisers give a specific house a certain rating and you disagree, you must be wrong – BOOM – letter.  I assume this is the case as I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/dreaded-fnma-letter-re-condition-ratings/">Dreaded FNMA Letter RE Condition Ratings</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/dreaded-fnma-letter-re-condition-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9121</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Contrary Response to The Future of Valuation</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAIFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently an article appeared in WorkingRE about the Future of Valuation. The author is the President of a large and highly respected Appraiser  Peer and Educational Organization.  My own contrary response was either too lengthy, or deemed too critical of a big advertiser for publication in WorkingRE. I thank the hosts of this blog for granting the space. My concern with the author’s views starts with the description of our Real Estate Appraisal profession as &#8216;valuation.&#8217; The concern is more than mere quibbling over semantics. Valuation is the phrase preferred by the Business Valuation community. They have long been dominated&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/">A Contrary Response to The Future of Valuation</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9111</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CU &#8220;Enhancements&#8221; Are Coming</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datappraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CU risk score, flags and messages Appraisers, In about 6 weeks, Fannie Mae will make available to LENDERS only, and probably by default indirectly, to their AMC agents, enhancements or improvements (in their opinion) to the Collateral Underwriter electronic review process. None of the Collateral Underwriter background info,  especially about Fannie Mae&#8217;s &#8216;additional comps&#8217; selection process, is shared directly with appraisers.  But when these are returned to appraisers in the form of a Quality Assurance request from the lender or AMC, appraisers are expected to drop everything and immediately review those for applicability in the appraisal report. Pay attention to the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/">CU &#8220;Enhancements&#8221; Are Coming</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8547</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freddie Mac Takes a Bite of the Apple</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/freddie-mac-takes-a-bite-of-the-apple/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/freddie-mac-takes-a-bite-of-the-apple/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Stewart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Freddie Mac Proprietary Messages in the UCDP Not wanting to be left home from the party, Freddie Mac has announced that on June 30, 2015 it will begin providing new feedback on appraisals submitted to it via the Uniform Collateral Data Portal (UCDP). Like Fannie Mae’s system, the messages will be delivered to those lenders seeking to sell residential loans to Freddie Mac. Most of the feedback will be in the form of warnings which essentially alert a lender there are some inconsistencies between the submitted appraisal report and data that Freddie Mac already possesses (like public records). For example,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/freddie-mac-takes-a-bite-of-the-apple/">Freddie Mac Takes a Bite of the Apple</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/freddie-mac-takes-a-bite-of-the-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7903</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraiser Soon to be Jailbird for Fraud</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraiser-soon-to-be-jailbird-for-fraud/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraiser-soon-to-be-jailbird-for-fraud/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a million dollar mortgage fraud scheme Appraisers, An appraiser in NY state has been convicted of a FELONY for incorrectly reporting the last sale date of a subject property in an appraisal report, which was used to defraud a lender in a million dollar mortgage fraud scheme. You can read the full story here. Per the info in the story: “Essig is the owner and operator of Essig Appraisals, an appraisal company that specialized in residential appraisals. According to statements made in Court today during Essig’s plea, Essig admitted that he made a false entry in an appraisal that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraiser-soon-to-be-jailbird-for-fraud/">Appraiser Soon to be Jailbird for Fraud</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraiser-soon-to-be-jailbird-for-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7724</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers&#8217; GLA vs Assessors&#8217; GLA</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-gla-vs-assessors-gla/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-gla-vs-assessors-gla/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GLA in your appraisal reports being questioned Appraisers, today (4/30/15), Freddie Mac released a document showing Warning and Fatal codes that will trigger if certain items are found in your reports sent to Freddie Mac through the Uniform Collateral Data Portal (UCDP), as of June 30, 2015. In 25 pages of codes, only 4 are ‘fatal’ and those are for items you should not be overlooking. See the PDF below and take a moment to look over the document. The very first ‘warning’ code is this one, which has two variations: FRE1001 The gross living area for the subject property ([GLA] sf)&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-gla-vs-assessors-gla/">Appraisers&#8217; GLA vs Assessors&#8217; GLA</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-gla-vs-assessors-gla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7552</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not a Comp, It&#8217;s a Sale; Stop Fannie Mae Lies!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/its-not-a-comp-its-a-sale-stop-fannie-mae-lies/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/its-not-a-comp-its-a-sale-stop-fannie-mae-lies/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCDP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is merely a SALE&#8230; Appraisers, Something’s been gnawing at my craw ever since January when FNMA’s wonderful Collateral Underwriter (CU) was unleashed to the world. And before that, when FNMA&#8217;s Appraiser Quality Monitoring (AQM) process was introduced to judge the work of appraisers. No one else has written about this. No one has even mentioned it. So I will:  It has to do with the word “Comp” which is used liberally by Fannie Mae (FNMA). What exactly is a “Comp?” In FNMA’s world, it’s any property that they obtain, either by their vast AVM process which examines millions of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/its-not-a-comp-its-a-sale-stop-fannie-mae-lies/">It&#8217;s Not a Comp, It&#8217;s a Sale; Stop Fannie Mae Lies!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/its-not-a-comp-its-a-sale-stop-fannie-mae-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7351</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helpful Appraisal Tips From the Seattle Chapter of the Appraisal Institute</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/helpful-appraisal-tips-from-the-seattle-chapter-of-the-appraisal-institute/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/helpful-appraisal-tips-from-the-seattle-chapter-of-the-appraisal-institute/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last Fall I had the pleasure of attending the annual conference presented by the Seattle Chapter of the Appraisal Institute. I was able to sit in on some interesting educational sessions. With all the conversation in industry surrounding CU and other initiatives directly impacting appraisers, I felt highlights from the educational sessions would be beneficial. The following information is from a presentation by Clark Dickson with HomeStreet Bank called, “Appraising for Lenders in Today’s World.” Mr. Dickson’s presentation was about appraisal quality and what it takes to have your appraisal be acceptable in today’s lending environment. He said that everything&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/helpful-appraisal-tips-from-the-seattle-chapter-of-the-appraisal-institute/">Helpful Appraisal Tips From the Seattle Chapter of the Appraisal Institute</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/helpful-appraisal-tips-from-the-seattle-chapter-of-the-appraisal-institute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7262</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Fannie Mae CU Training Video</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-cu-training-video/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-cu-training-video/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Training admits that CU use of CENSUS BLOCK GROUPS Appraisers, FNMA has released a new training video that helps lenders understand how to PROPERLY use Collateral Underwriter, which in some cases has not been happening since Jan. 26, 2015. By reviewing this info, you can learn how to write reports that pass the CU evaluations, and make your reports more complete and accurate. But keep reading. One thing I find interesting is CU assigns a unique ‘appraiser number’ for every appraiser who has reports submitted by Lenders to the CU. They don’t just use the appraiser’s license number by itself. Secondly, this&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-cu-training-video/">New Fannie Mae CU Training Video</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-cu-training-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7051</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CU and Appraiser Regulation</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/cu-and-appraiser-regulation/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/cu-and-appraiser-regulation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Whether you believe Fannie Mae’s comprehensive rollout of Collateral Underwriter will finally weed out the lazy form-fillers or it will end up euthanizing the aging residential leg of the profession once and for all, is not the subject of this article. There are plenty of blogs, articles, and seminars that are wrestling with the efficacy of CU and its long-term impact. To be sure, the profession has entered the new age of big data. Residential appraisers will need to navigate regression analysis, heat maps, trend lines, oblique aerial images, and especially how to tie it all together into something meaningful. From&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/cu-and-appraiser-regulation/">CU and Appraiser Regulation</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/cu-and-appraiser-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7040</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Original Comparable Photos</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/original-comparable-photos/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/original-comparable-photos/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently received an AMC update and reminder about the need for and why actual comparable photos are necessary. My reply: Original Comparable Photographs: Scope of Work Point 3: Inspection of the comparable sales from at least the street. This requirement does not tie the appraiser to a specific time for that inspection. Geographical competence would have the appraiser in the area of the comparables many times, and depending on the appraiser&#8217;s experience, for many years. Taking a comparable photo a month, six months, a year or more after the sale, does not represent the sale&#8217;s condition at the time&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/original-comparable-photos/">Original Comparable Photos</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/original-comparable-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7029</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Should CU be Transparent&#8221; Survey Results</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FNMA’s CU is causing a big industry ruckus. ICAP member Keith Wolf, SRA, AI-RRS, created a survey in January because opinions being posted across multiple message boards and blogs are fragmented. The results of this survey are out and show that a vast majority of appraisers believe Fannie Mae CU should be transparent. Nearly 70 percent of appraisers said that they will increase fees to cover the extra work CU may cause and 80 percent believe that CU risk scores will cause lenders and AMC clients to request appraisers to fit comps to the CU model. Also 73 percent believe that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/">&#8220;Should CU be Transparent&#8221; Survey Results</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7004</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If I Cannot Support a Small Adjustment, I Just do not Make it</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I am more circumspect about the adjustments I make. The most feared date in the appraisal industry has come. January 26, 2015 arrived with much trepidation and trembling amongst myself and my appraiser colleagues. The day of the Collateral Underwriter (CU) had finally arrived. Yet, it turned out to be a pretty typical day for most. We are now over a week removed from the CU and I have yet to receive even one CU-related revision request. I guess that means one of two things; either I am an incredibly talented appraiser who uses all the best comps and supports every one&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/">If I Cannot Support a Small Adjustment, I Just do not Make it</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6993</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae &#8216;Lender Letter&#8217; About the CU process</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-lender-letter-about-the-cu-process/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-lender-letter-about-the-cu-process/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lender Letter explains CU process Appraisers, The latest FNMA Lender Letter was released on February 2, 2015 (see PDF below). You really should print and read this new Lender Letter. It attempts to smooth over lots of ruffled feathers among appraisers, AMC’s, Lenders, Underwriters, etc. To be honest, I find a bunch of ‘pipe dream’ info in this document. Items such as: CU is a Fannie Mae–only risk management tool. ==&#62; Freddie Mac is said to be working to implement this or a similar process very soon CU does not accept or reject appraisal reports or characterize an appraisal as “good” or “bad.”&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-lender-letter-about-the-cu-process/">Fannie Mae &#8216;Lender Letter&#8217; About the CU process</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-fannie-mae-lender-letter-about-the-cu-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6966</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
