<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Call to Action	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 20:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19480</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16310#comment-19480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19449&quot;&gt;Candy Watts&lt;/a&gt;.

They certainly SHOULD go out of business-or at least get out of anything having to do with American Real Estate Appraisal.  Is there ANYTHING that they have done positively isay the past 15 years that actually promoted or preserved public trust? Even IVS is a farce!

They have joined the special interests. Think about it. Why else redefine &quot;Evaluation&quot;? Some states and IA all say evaluations aren&#039;t appraisals. If that&#039;s the case, then even the term is outside TAFs mandate.

Interesting that CoreLogic had their employee appointed to Board of Trustees last time around by Sponsors Committee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19449">Candy Watts</a>.</p>
<p>They certainly SHOULD go out of business-or at least get out of anything having to do with American Real Estate Appraisal.  Is there ANYTHING that they have done positively isay the past 15 years that actually promoted or preserved public trust? Even IVS is a farce!</p>
<p>They have joined the special interests. Think about it. Why else redefine &#8220;Evaluation&#8221;? Some states and IA all say evaluations aren&#8217;t appraisals. If that&#8217;s the case, then even the term is outside TAFs mandate.</p>
<p>Interesting that CoreLogic had their employee appointed to Board of Trustees last time around by Sponsors Committee.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="19480" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Candy Watts		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Candy Watts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16310#comment-19449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;“The primary objective the AQB is to promote and maintain public trust in the appraisal profession&quot;. So I guess all these changes will put the AQB out of business since every other organization is doing its best to reduce the  public trust and make it easier and cheaper for lenders to make loans and pass the risk and liability off to an investor or the tax payers all while they are charging every fee they can to make money doing it. When did we fall into the Twilight Zone???&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The primary objective the AQB is to promote and maintain public trust in the appraisal profession&#8221;. So I guess all these changes will put the AQB out of business since every other organization is doing its best to reduce the  public trust and make it easier and cheaper for lenders to make loans and pass the risk and liability off to an investor or the tax payers all while they are charging every fee they can to make money doing it. When did we fall into the Twilight Zone???</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="19449" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16310#comment-19165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;David, first there was &lt;strong&gt;Opinion of Market Value in a Real Estate APPRAISA&lt;/strong&gt;L; then there was an &lt;strong&gt;ESTIMATE of Market Value in an appraisal or Evaluation&lt;/strong&gt;. Now we are back to&lt;strong&gt; developing credibly supported opinions of value as &#8220;valuators.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&#8220;TAF is probably unaware of it, but I&#8217;m certified as a&lt;strong&gt; Real Estate Appraiser&lt;/strong&gt; &#8211; &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; as a business &lt;em&gt;valuator&lt;/em&gt; which is where the valuator terminology came from. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, this particular change is to &#8216;bless&#8217; evaluations as credible appraisal &#8216;types&#8217; even though most are pretty poorly stated restricted reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Think of it as creating rules that will be as  clear as mud so that even though you and I can technically do them (assuming we comply with USPAP SR1 and SR2) and Preamble, etc.; lenders will still have ease and convenience in designing their own inherently non compliant forms, setting ultra low fees, claiming the forms are USPAP compliant and leaving the burden for compliance ambiguously buried in the small print.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is just another non public  &#8216;advantage&#8217; of having behind the scenes state regulators lobbying through AARO; or other special interests modifying our operating rules on a  state by state basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m still waiting for verbiage that says in effect &#8220;&lt;em&gt;USPAP shall be applied in all federally regulated transactions at all times unless you reside in a state with a vowel in its name; OR it is a cloudy day at the time of inspection, and the appraiser is not wearing shoes with leather soles; or where it is inconvenient for the lender and loan officers involved in which case no meaningful standards need be followed&lt;/em&gt;.&#8221;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, first there was <strong>Opinion of Market Value in a Real Estate APPRAISA</strong>L; then there was an <strong>ESTIMATE of Market Value in an appraisal or Evaluation</strong>. Now we are back to<strong> developing credibly supported opinions of value as &#8220;valuators.</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;TAF is probably unaware of it, but I&#8217;m certified as a<strong> Real Estate Appraiser</strong> &#8211; <em>not</em> as a business <em>valuator</em> which is where the valuator terminology came from. </p>
<p>In any case, this particular change is to &#8216;bless&#8217; evaluations as credible appraisal &#8216;types&#8217; even though most are pretty poorly stated restricted reports.</p>
<p>Think of it as creating rules that will be as  clear as mud so that even though you and I can technically do them (assuming we comply with USPAP SR1 and SR2) and Preamble, etc.; lenders will still have ease and convenience in designing their own inherently non compliant forms, setting ultra low fees, claiming the forms are USPAP compliant and leaving the burden for compliance ambiguously buried in the small print.</p>
<p>This is just another non public  &#8216;advantage&#8217; of having behind the scenes state regulators lobbying through AARO; or other special interests modifying our operating rules on a  state by state basis.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for verbiage that says in effect &#8220;<em>USPAP shall be applied in all federally regulated transactions at all times unless you reside in a state with a vowel in its name; OR it is a cloudy day at the time of inspection, and the appraiser is not wearing shoes with leather soles; or where it is inconvenient for the lender and loan officers involved in which case no meaningful standards need be followed</em>.&#8221;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="19165" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16310#comment-19162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure why our government has a need to change the definition of &quot;evaluation&quot;.  There is evaluation and valuation, but with this change it appears to make these words the same.... Am I reading this right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why our government has a need to change the definition of &#8220;evaluation&#8221;.  There is evaluation and valuation, but with this change it appears to make these words the same&#8230;. Am I reading this right?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="19162" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian C.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/virginia-bills-introduced-call-2-action/#comment-19161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16310#comment-19161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure the Appraisal Institute will fully support ANY bill REVAA introduces and the hell with the residential appraiser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the Appraisal Institute will fully support ANY bill REVAA introduces and the hell with the residential appraiser.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="19161" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
