<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: VA Unofficially Says NOPE to ANSI	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Seneca		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-35775</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seneca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-35775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So has FHA adopted ANSI yet?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So has FHA adopted ANSI yet?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="35775" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 23:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33736&quot;&gt;koma&lt;/a&gt;.

Someone got back to me with nice words, said the letter would be forwarded to the work group handling ansi issues.  I&#039;m sad, what a waste of 20 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33736">koma</a>.</p>
<p>Someone got back to me with nice words, said the letter would be forwarded to the work group handling ansi issues.  I&#8217;m sad, what a waste of 20 years.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33738" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 22:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33735&quot;&gt;Baggins&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the link, but what&#039;s the use they don&#039;t listen to us appraisers anyway. When they bring us in it&#039;s just for show. Hey they can push this for the next 3-5 when most of us will probably be retiring then their off with the use of automated systems 100%.

I&#039;ll be moving back home to the islands smoking my Pakalolo watching this circus on TV. Nah probably not...hahaha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33735">Baggins</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link, but what&#8217;s the use they don&#8217;t listen to us appraisers anyway. When they bring us in it&#8217;s just for show. Hey they can push this for the next 3-5 when most of us will probably be retiring then their off with the use of automated systems 100%.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be moving back home to the islands smoking my Pakalolo watching this circus on TV. Nah probably not&#8230;hahaha</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33736" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 22:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33734&quot;&gt;koma&lt;/a&gt;.

Report the size as materially different in a fictitious manner.  While not letting this falsified reporting affect the final market value conclusions or credibility of the assignment.

Does the updated FNMA form even have free adjustment lines?  The samples I viewed were too small for me to figure that out.

You could always fill the grid normally and do the sketch normally, then take an image grab of that and include it in your report as an image or adobe attachment.  Then butcher your net/gross and add a few dozen extra warning errors, fail to bracket, the works.  That way reviewers and users can clearly understand why you&#039;ve reported in a manner contrary to market standards and contrary to every other real world indicator except the lunacy imposed with ANSI standards.  That&#039;s a good way to handle this if you want to keep moving and will illustrate the hippocracy of this nonsense.

Voice your objections to Fannie directly using this link.  While you still can...
https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/appraiser-contact-us-form]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33734">koma</a>.</p>
<p>Report the size as materially different in a fictitious manner.  While not letting this falsified reporting affect the final market value conclusions or credibility of the assignment.</p>
<p>Does the updated FNMA form even have free adjustment lines?  The samples I viewed were too small for me to figure that out.</p>
<p>You could always fill the grid normally and do the sketch normally, then take an image grab of that and include it in your report as an image or adobe attachment.  Then butcher your net/gross and add a few dozen extra warning errors, fail to bracket, the works.  That way reviewers and users can clearly understand why you&#8217;ve reported in a manner contrary to market standards and contrary to every other real world indicator except the lunacy imposed with ANSI standards.  That&#8217;s a good way to handle this if you want to keep moving and will illustrate the hippocracy of this nonsense.</p>
<p>Voice your objections to Fannie directly using this link.  While you still can&#8230;<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/appraiser-contact-us-form" rel="nofollow ugc">https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/appraiser-contact-us-form</a></p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33735" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33732&quot;&gt;Diana n&lt;/a&gt;.

Good for you! 

I had a discussion with that AMC and they stated to just put the left out square footage, if any, from the ANSI measurement on a seperate line in the grid and make the adjustment there. RIDICULOUS!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33732">Diana n</a>.</p>
<p>Good for you! </p>
<p>I had a discussion with that AMC and they stated to just put the left out square footage, if any, from the ANSI measurement on a seperate line in the grid and make the adjustment there. RIDICULOUS!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33734" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana n		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 22:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33728&quot;&gt;koma&lt;/a&gt;.

I got the same email and I agree with you 100 percent, this is more BS to put appraisers in out of business. I also got an order for a 1004 that they wanted to pay me $250 for, lots of luck. What an insult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33728">koma</a>.</p>
<p>I got the same email and I agree with you 100 percent, this is more BS to put appraisers in out of business. I also got an order for a 1004 that they wanted to pay me $250 for, lots of luck. What an insult.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33732" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33728&quot;&gt;koma&lt;/a&gt;.

My buddy independent appraiser is making a killing in private work and attorney work, like $1k to $1.5k avg just to start.  This is the front side as they &#039;test the market&#039; with their own brand of &#039;mandates&#039;.  Lots of that going around lately.  They can talk tough until the sun sets, they are not in charge of the independent market and all the decisions individuals make.  The best part is they&#039;ll be back.  They need you, but you do not need them.  Same thing for FNMA.  These geniuses think they can use appraisers as a tool to press the entire housing market to implement sweeping changes nationwide.  Oh boy, if only appraisers had that kind of influence, we&#039;d have started by sweeping all the amc&#039;s away a long time ago and driven our own fees up substantially.  We can&#039;t even get the monkey off our backs or the vultures out of our pockets.  How the heck do they think we&#039;re going to influence county assessment offices?  The ending to this is predictable but they&#039;ll refuse to relent until someone else can be made a scape goat for their poor decisions and illogical policy implementations.  My crystal ball is glowing;  There will be a required CE class for ANSI, because the appraisers are just not getting it.  Soon we&#039;ll have uspap, racial equality, and ANSI occupying half of our bi annual CE requirements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33728">koma</a>.</p>
<p>My buddy independent appraiser is making a killing in private work and attorney work, like $1k to $1.5k avg just to start.  This is the front side as they &#8216;test the market&#8217; with their own brand of &#8216;mandates&#8217;.  Lots of that going around lately.  They can talk tough until the sun sets, they are not in charge of the independent market and all the decisions individuals make.  The best part is they&#8217;ll be back.  They need you, but you do not need them.  Same thing for FNMA.  These geniuses think they can use appraisers as a tool to press the entire housing market to implement sweeping changes nationwide.  Oh boy, if only appraisers had that kind of influence, we&#8217;d have started by sweeping all the amc&#8217;s away a long time ago and driven our own fees up substantially.  We can&#8217;t even get the monkey off our backs or the vultures out of our pockets.  How the heck do they think we&#8217;re going to influence county assessment offices?  The ending to this is predictable but they&#8217;ll refuse to relent until someone else can be made a scape goat for their poor decisions and illogical policy implementations.  My crystal ball is glowing;  There will be a required CE class for ANSI, because the appraisers are just not getting it.  Soon we&#8217;ll have uspap, racial equality, and ANSI occupying half of our bi annual CE requirements.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33731" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well the hammer just dropped, One of the few AMC&#039;s I do business with just sent out an email stating they are REQUIRING that all reports completed for them moving forward must be completed to ANSI Standards. No matter who the report is for it must be completed to that standard. I do not and will not use that standard. 

Just got off the phone with them and said after 12 years GOODBYE!

Hope there is more that will stand up to this BS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the hammer just dropped, One of the few AMC&#8217;s I do business with just sent out an email stating they are REQUIRING that all reports completed for them moving forward must be completed to ANSI Standards. No matter who the report is for it must be completed to that standard. I do not and will not use that standard. </p>
<p>Just got off the phone with them and said after 12 years GOODBYE!</p>
<p>Hope there is more that will stand up to this BS.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33728" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33705&quot;&gt;Diana n&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks.  Just posted this in another thread.  Repost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33705">Diana n</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks.  Just posted this in another thread.  Repost.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33727" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Cahn		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Cahn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[VA is usually the cooler head out of all the agencies, and I have worked for them all. So, I hope VA does not adopt the new ANSI standard. Simply because it makes no sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VA is usually the cooler head out of all the agencies, and I have worked for them all. So, I hope VA does not adopt the new ANSI standard. Simply because it makes no sense.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33708" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 01:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33706&quot;&gt;Koma&lt;/a&gt;.

Approximately 40,000 appraisers completing gse work, x $25 per flimsy 16 page ansi ebook, sometimes recurring.  $1,000,000.  Question, if this is supposed to be the new standard, why do we have to pay for the book?  Mortgage giant FNMA can&#039;t negotiate a free copy?  Somebody re print the pdf and post it please. We don&#039;t have money to throw away on flimsy digital ebooks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33706">Koma</a>.</p>
<p>Approximately 40,000 appraisers completing gse work, x $25 per flimsy 16 page ansi ebook, sometimes recurring.  $1,000,000.  Question, if this is supposed to be the new standard, why do we have to pay for the book?  Mortgage giant FNMA can&#8217;t negotiate a free copy?  Somebody re print the pdf and post it please. We don&#8217;t have money to throw away on flimsy digital ebooks.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33707" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t wait to see this mess play out. I&#039;ve read  hundreds of post where as the appraisers say they will just use the GXX001 code to bypass the ANSI requirement. The updated guidance states that this is not acceptable. Wonder what that will do to the time it takes for their loans to close. ...hahahaha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see this mess play out. I&#8217;ve read  hundreds of post where as the appraisers say they will just use the GXX001 code to bypass the ANSI requirement. The updated guidance states that this is not acceptable. Wonder what that will do to the time it takes for their loans to close. &#8230;hahahaha</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33706" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana n		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33704&quot;&gt;Baggins&lt;/a&gt;.

Well said, I can just imagine what assessors are saying about this stupidity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33704">Baggins</a>.</p>
<p>Well said, I can just imagine what assessors are saying about this stupidity.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33705" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GXX001.  That&#039;s just the way it is.  If I&#039;ve read that correctly, according to the FAQ, if one has to disqualify legitimate agla area and report that in basement, we&#039;re supposed to still report those room counts in the agla line, but adjust all the size as if it&#039;s similar to a basement.  Yet, our matching model comps will be reported and adjusted with it&#039;s true market accepted size statements.  Unless FNMA can push something through on the federal level and force assessors nationally to retroactively change all reported sizes to ansi standards, this will never work.  Coupled with the updated forms, incompetence abounds at FNMA.  Imagine a large 2 story on slope, with a 800 sq ft qualifiable agla area with 8 rooms, and a 1600 sq ft basement with 3 rooms.  But only if it&#039;s a conventional loan.  If this same home is being examined for HUD, VA, IRS, legal, forensic, courts, avm, etc, then it&#039;s back to a 1,600 agla w/ 800 sf basement, 8 rooms up, 3 down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GXX001.  That&#8217;s just the way it is.  If I&#8217;ve read that correctly, according to the FAQ, if one has to disqualify legitimate agla area and report that in basement, we&#8217;re supposed to still report those room counts in the agla line, but adjust all the size as if it&#8217;s similar to a basement.  Yet, our matching model comps will be reported and adjusted with it&#8217;s true market accepted size statements.  Unless FNMA can push something through on the federal level and force assessors nationally to retroactively change all reported sizes to ansi standards, this will never work.  Coupled with the updated forms, incompetence abounds at FNMA.  Imagine a large 2 story on slope, with a 800 sq ft qualifiable agla area with 8 rooms, and a 1600 sq ft basement with 3 rooms.  But only if it&#8217;s a conventional loan.  If this same home is being examined for HUD, VA, IRS, legal, forensic, courts, avm, etc, then it&#8217;s back to a 1,600 agla w/ 800 sf basement, 8 rooms up, 3 down.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33704" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brent A Johnson, SRA, AI-RRS		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent A Johnson, SRA, AI-RRS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It appears at this point that all investors except Fannie want improvements measured to local market based standards rather than ANSI based standards alone - that makes sense when valuing residential improvements within their respective competitive market segments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears at this point that all investors except Fannie want improvements measured to local market based standards rather than ANSI based standards alone &#8211; that makes sense when valuing residential improvements within their respective competitive market segments.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33703" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/va-unofficially-says-nope-2-ansi-measuring-protocol/#comment-33702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26506#comment-33702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s great news! Hopeful for an official statement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news! Hopeful for an official statement.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33702" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
