<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: UAD to Assist Local Assessors?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32984</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32980&quot;&gt;Cotton&lt;/a&gt;.

The primary problem is they are simply not paying enough taxes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32980">Cotton</a>.</p>
<p>The primary problem is they are simply not paying enough taxes.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32984" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotton		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey liberals and race baiters! When performing assessments utilizing CU will assessors who value properties in predominantly black neighborhoods be called racist when the values are lower then those in predominantly white neighborhoods? Oh the hypocrisy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey liberals and race baiters! When performing assessments utilizing CU will assessors who value properties in predominantly black neighborhoods be called racist when the values are lower then those in predominantly white neighborhoods? Oh the hypocrisy!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32980" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JAMES		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JAMES]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait until the assessors find out Fannie Mae is mandating ANSI next April. None of the assessors in the counties around our office use ANSI now. I wonder if Fannie Mae is planning to tell them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until the assessors find out Fannie Mae is mandating ANSI next April. None of the assessors in the counties around our office use ANSI now. I wonder if Fannie Mae is planning to tell them?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32951" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32948&quot;&gt;Joseph A Fassari&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;A points system for key components.&quot;  An excellent suggestion.  Wow, imagine just filling out a more detailed list of components and updates to come about that information, something not subjective but rather fixed in scientific measurements.  But how would the tiny minds of bureaucrats process and monetize the data while simultaneously placing more pressure on appraisers for higher loan production alongside increased efficiency with lower fee compensation?  Your suggestion is so good that it can not compute at the GSE level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32948">Joseph A Fassari</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;A points system for key components.&#8221;  An excellent suggestion.  Wow, imagine just filling out a more detailed list of components and updates to come about that information, something not subjective but rather fixed in scientific measurements.  But how would the tiny minds of bureaucrats process and monetize the data while simultaneously placing more pressure on appraisers for higher loan production alongside increased efficiency with lower fee compensation?  Your suggestion is so good that it can not compute at the GSE level.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32949" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph A Fassari		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph A Fassari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[UAD is lacking and misleading. It is too broad but a step in the right direction. It is subject to interpretation. I recently reviewed a home 90 + years of age. It was a flip sale reno. The appraiser stated C2. It still had aluminum siding that was fading and oxidized. This is one of many. Most homes that are not new will fall under C-4. What it does not due is state the modernization. I saw a non-modern home that was in perfect condition. C3. Thats not comparable to a home that has been rehabilitated or modern and well maintained. They need appraisers to set the rating system. The data must be shared. There should be a point system for key components.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UAD is lacking and misleading. It is too broad but a step in the right direction. It is subject to interpretation. I recently reviewed a home 90 + years of age. It was a flip sale reno. The appraiser stated C2. It still had aluminum siding that was fading and oxidized. This is one of many. Most homes that are not new will fall under C-4. What it does not due is state the modernization. I saw a non-modern home that was in perfect condition. C3. Thats not comparable to a home that has been rehabilitated or modern and well maintained. They need appraisers to set the rating system. The data must be shared. There should be a point system for key components.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32948" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JoAnn M Stratton		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoAnn M Stratton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 22:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I completely disagree with that idea. For example here in Arizona, assessor&#039;s offices since 1964 have been using a 28 coding system for the quality of  construction for residential properties. Fannie / Freddie only use six codes. So why should assessment offices go to an inferior system? I have been unhappy with F/F six code system since it was developed because of Arizona&#039;s superior assessment system. And because F/F only have six codes, no two appraisers have same opinion because so many properties are at or near the differences between two codes. So one appraiser says it is a Q3 and the other appraiser says it is a Q4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree with that idea. For example here in Arizona, assessor&#8217;s offices since 1964 have been using a 28 coding system for the quality of  construction for residential properties. Fannie / Freddie only use six codes. So why should assessment offices go to an inferior system? I have been unhappy with F/F six code system since it was developed because of Arizona&#8217;s superior assessment system. And because F/F only have six codes, no two appraisers have same opinion because so many properties are at or near the differences between two codes. So one appraiser says it is a Q3 and the other appraiser says it is a Q4.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32947" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32943&quot;&gt;John Smith on Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.

https://patriotarchives.blogspot.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32943">John Smith on Facebook</a>.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="https://patriotarchives.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://patriotarchives.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32946" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32944&quot;&gt;Mary&lt;/a&gt;.

Although GSE&#039;s are federally chartered, they are private companies.  Appears several assessors are confusing FNMA CU database with a sort of possible government partnership.  The CU systems are patented and owned.  FHFA calls the shots now but if you presume they&#039;re an objective third party, think again.

The systematic formulation of biased appraisal accusations are also brought to us by special interests seeking private partnerships.  Seeking to redirect GSE monies and relief programs which are taxpayer backed to their preferred populace segments, skimming fees along the way.  And then there is money to be made in upcoming proprietary tech and new automated systems.  Just more taxation without representation.  The whole thing is brought to you by the federal reserve, another private entity.  100 years of not being federal, and not having any reserves.  &#039;All wars are bankers wars&#039;.  

Now that first receivers of money are increasing speculation in residential housing, the game is on like never before.  What we have all come to know and understand about real estate and monetary stability will never again be the same.  RESO group and other automated endeavors will allow speculators from around the world easy access.  We&#039;re only in the first few years of this, just wait...  Or join the movement and fight back but no ground will be gained going back and forth about the racist tripes or whatever contrived argument is being pushed that day.  The root cause of all of this is our failure to adhere to Article1 SectionX.  Otherwise there would not be &#039;free money&#039; to give with an endless line of special interests all with their hands out, manipulating public opinion and policy along the way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32944">Mary</a>.</p>
<p>Although GSE&#8217;s are federally chartered, they are private companies.  Appears several assessors are confusing FNMA CU database with a sort of possible government partnership.  The CU systems are patented and owned.  FHFA calls the shots now but if you presume they&#8217;re an objective third party, think again.</p>
<p>The systematic formulation of biased appraisal accusations are also brought to us by special interests seeking private partnerships.  Seeking to redirect GSE monies and relief programs which are taxpayer backed to their preferred populace segments, skimming fees along the way.  And then there is money to be made in upcoming proprietary tech and new automated systems.  Just more taxation without representation.  The whole thing is brought to you by the federal reserve, another private entity.  100 years of not being federal, and not having any reserves.  &#8216;All wars are bankers wars&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Now that first receivers of money are increasing speculation in residential housing, the game is on like never before.  What we have all come to know and understand about real estate and monetary stability will never again be the same.  RESO group and other automated endeavors will allow speculators from around the world easy access.  We&#8217;re only in the first few years of this, just wait&#8230;  Or join the movement and fight back but no ground will be gained going back and forth about the racist tripes or whatever contrived argument is being pushed that day.  The root cause of all of this is our failure to adhere to Article1 SectionX.  Otherwise there would not be &#8216;free money&#8217; to give with an endless line of special interests all with their hands out, manipulating public opinion and policy along the way.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32945" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So they want our educated opinion on these properties for hiking taxes, YET they call us biased and racist when it suits them. Maybe they wont use UAD for THOSE properties. What a joke. Some properties will be assessed higher while others will be assumed AVERAGE in condition and quality. This will create more tax appeals and bog down the system as it is not entirely fair. There is a RANGE of opinion and values within each rating of C3 and Q3 or Q4. How are they going to determine how much value each rating is really worth? Good luck with that process!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they want our educated opinion on these properties for hiking taxes, YET they call us biased and racist when it suits them. Maybe they wont use UAD for THOSE properties. What a joke. Some properties will be assessed higher while others will be assumed AVERAGE in condition and quality. This will create more tax appeals and bog down the system as it is not entirely fair. There is a RANGE of opinion and values within each rating of C3 and Q3 or Q4. How are they going to determine how much value each rating is really worth? Good luck with that process!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32944" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Smith on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Smith on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New IRS rules under Biden.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New IRS rules under Biden.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32943" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blake Kernea on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Kernea on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are they paying appraisers for their data collection?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they paying appraisers for their data collection?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32942" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If they get access, we want access.  They could just scrape comps sharing databases.  In Denver the assessors office now maintains an MLS subscription and employs several people who&#039;s sole purpose is to review all sales data and use that current information to update their assessment records on quality size and feature.  They reportedly review every single sale.  

The data is already at their fingertips and it&#039;s more reliable to hire someone to enter information accurately from an MLS relay than to count on a GSE database.  They&#039;ll be copying data copied by the third party typists.  Everything will be Q3 C3.  They&#039;ll be asking, why do all these reports have nearly identical property description language?  This is two entirely different scope of work approaches.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they get access, we want access.  They could just scrape comps sharing databases.  In Denver the assessors office now maintains an MLS subscription and employs several people who&#8217;s sole purpose is to review all sales data and use that current information to update their assessment records on quality size and feature.  They reportedly review every single sale.  </p>
<p>The data is already at their fingertips and it&#8217;s more reliable to hire someone to enter information accurately from an MLS relay than to count on a GSE database.  They&#8217;ll be copying data copied by the third party typists.  Everything will be Q3 C3.  They&#8217;ll be asking, why do all these reports have nearly identical property description language?  This is two entirely different scope of work approaches.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32941" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: csm		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[csm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great! Another way to screw appraisers.  If FHFA sells my collected data, I should at least get some $$ out of it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Another way to screw appraisers.  If FHFA sells my collected data, I should at least get some $$ out of it!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32939" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Morgan Realtors on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Morgan Realtors on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They need additional revenue. This gives them a reason to increase taxable value. I would say no. If assessors want to know go out and do your own work Make your own opinions and stop trying to ride out coat tails]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need additional revenue. This gives them a reason to increase taxable value. I would say no. If assessors want to know go out and do your own work Make your own opinions and stop trying to ride out coat tails</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32938" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Raechel Stickney on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raechel Stickney on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great, now we will be blamed for taxes going up on properties....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now we will be blamed for taxes going up on properties&#8230;.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32937" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lane Leppink on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uad-2-assist-local-assessors/#comment-32936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lane Leppink on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26192#comment-32936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s already many assessor&#039;s who use Realtor information and pictures in their assessment of finished living area, so part of me thinks this shouldn&#039;t be a big deal, however arent the appraisals in question, and the content therein considered CONFIDENTIAL in nature? When Realtors use photos and statistics as part of their public marketing, they also expose the property to the local assessors, but when an appraisal is done, the data that&#039;s reported is exclusive to the client (and their assigns).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already many assessor&#8217;s who use Realtor information and pictures in their assessment of finished living area, so part of me thinks this shouldn&#8217;t be a big deal, however arent the appraisals in question, and the content therein considered CONFIDENTIAL in nature? When Realtors use photos and statistics as part of their public marketing, they also expose the property to the local assessors, but when an appraisal is done, the data that&#8217;s reported is exclusive to the client (and their assigns).</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="32936" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
