<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>workfile - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/workfile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/workfile/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 03:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Key Part of USPAP Not Available from TAF</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/key-part-of-uspap-not-available-from-taf/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/key-part-of-uspap-not-available-from-taf/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=31080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>this is a colossal failure on their part – to have a key document on BACKORDER until a month from now, or longer!&#160; Appraisers, I have a print copy of the current USPAP, but need/want a PRINT copy of the AO/FAQ Reference Manual, which TAF decided to make into a separate document for this version at a cost of $75. I prefer the printed versions, rather than the PDF so I can read it and use a highlighter for key items. I went onto the TAF web site on July 17, 2024 to order the document, and found this: In&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/key-part-of-uspap-not-available-from-taf/">Key Part of USPAP Not Available from TAF</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/key-part-of-uspap-not-available-from-taf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">31080</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality of Today&#8217;s Appraisal Environment</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/reality-of-todays-appraisal-environment-n-discriminatory-falsehood/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/reality-of-todays-appraisal-environment-n-discriminatory-falsehood/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The US Department of Housing and Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=30048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proving discriminatory activity is hard, which is probably one reason HUD is dragging their collective feet in resolving the filed complaints.&#160; The real scourge of what’s been happening to appraisers for the past 5 years (yes, it started prior to the last election) has been revealed by Mr. Isaac Peck, in this article. You really need to read it, perhaps again, if you saw it come through your email on Wednesday October 25. Isaac has allowed me to “re-broadcast” his article. Yes, it’s a ‘sales promotion’ but it contains critical information appraisers need to know about. The first paragraph, contained&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/reality-of-todays-appraisal-environment-n-discriminatory-falsehood/">Reality of Today&#8217;s Appraisal Environment</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/reality-of-todays-appraisal-environment-n-discriminatory-falsehood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30048</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CoreLogic Policy Change Counter to USPAP Requirements</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/corelogic-policy-change-counter-2-uspap-requirements</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/corelogic-policy-change-counter-2-uspap-requirements#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CoreLogic is pleased to announce a change to its data retention policy. I received this notice from CoreLogic: Effective April 1, 2023, CoreLogic’s maximum storage commitment for appraisal and title data will be limited to 5 years. NOTICE OF CHANGE TO CORELOGIC DATA RETENTION POLICYDear Trusted Provider, In careful consideration of requests from our clients as well as industry risk management best practices, CoreLogic is pleased to announce a change to its data retention policy. Effective April 1, 2023, CoreLogic’s maximum storage commitment for appraisal and title data will be limited to 5 years. This change applies to all existing&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/corelogic-policy-change-counter-2-uspap-requirements">CoreLogic Policy Change Counter to USPAP Requirements</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/corelogic-policy-change-counter-2-uspap-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CoreLogic-Policy-Change-Counter-to-USPAP-Requirements.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28837</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biased Appraisers? I Don&#8217;t Think So</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/biased-appraiser-judging-an-entire-profession-by-anecdotal-evidence</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/biased-appraiser-judging-an-entire-profession-by-anecdotal-evidence#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To judge an entire profession by anecdotal evidence is equally both stupid and harmful&#8230; The entire emphasis was on &#8220;anecdotal evidence&#8221; which is not documented or supported. Story after story was told about how appraisers had produced a &#8220;biased&#8221; report. No documentation and no evidence to support their claims was presented. Folks, after discussing this topic with and learning more about the appraiser who wrote this following essay, I have decided to distribute the essay below as a way to further support what we appraisers do in our work, and to expose the fallacies that have been presented to date&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/biased-appraiser-judging-an-entire-profession-by-anecdotal-evidence">Biased Appraisers? I Don&#8217;t Think So</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/biased-appraiser-judging-an-entire-profession-by-anecdotal-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26856</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Can Complain About Appraisals?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/who-should-be-allowed-2-complain-about-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/who-should-be-allowed-2-complain-about-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Time to get on my soapbox and complain about a complaint filed against me (not a charge, but merely a complaint). I did an appraisal of a multi-family property near my office. The property owner/borrower called me to complain about the appraisal since it came in far less than she thought it should (not unusual). Clearly, I could not answer her questions since she was not the client. This upset her greatly, so she filed a complaint with the State. The complaint had no basis in substance. In fact, the complaint was that my appraisal was too low. Since neither&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/who-should-be-allowed-2-complain-about-appraisals">Who Can Complain About Appraisals?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/who-should-be-allowed-2-complain-about-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22186</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;d Be Better off at McDonalds</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-hybrids-inflated-indicated-value-n-pittance-pay</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-hybrids-inflated-indicated-value-n-pittance-pay#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;they provide no documentation as to how their algorithm produces this indicated value&#8230; I had to &#8220;jump in the pool&#8221; and see what these bifurcated appraisals are all about. The names have been withheld to protect the guilty. I recently completed a &#8220;bifurcated&#8221; report for one of the AMC&#8217;s providing this type of service. The form is to be completed on their site and they recently upgraded to the &#8220;new and improved&#8221; report on their portal as of January 1, 2019. The subject is sited in an urban location and while not an anomaly per se, does display features such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-hybrids-inflated-indicated-value-n-pittance-pay">I&#8217;d Be Better off at McDonalds</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-hybrids-inflated-indicated-value-n-pittance-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20923</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square feet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How can using such a contractor not be a violation? In the context of a real estate appraisal, especially a residential real estate appraisal for a lender thru an AMC, what is confidential? First, look at USPAP’s definition of confidential information (lines 105 – 108 in the 2018-2019 edition). It says “confidential information [is] information that is either&#8230;identified by the client as confidential when providing it to an appraiser and that is not available from any other source; or&#8230;classified as confidential or private by applicable law or regulation” (ibid; emphasis added). Notice confidentiality flows to the client, not to any&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service">USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20694</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREA the Energizer Bunny of Appraiser Abuse</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/BREA-corruption-appraiser-abuse</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/BREA-corruption-appraiser-abuse#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The gift that just keeps on giving and giving. BREA is the Energizer Bunny of Appraiser abuse. Anyone following AppraisersBlogs knows I’m no fan of BREA. I helped Zach Schorr humiliate them in court on a daily basis, for five days in a row in mid-2017. That result was that the Administrative Law Judge found myself and codefendant (respondent) to have “credibly testified.”  The states witness to have “embarrassed” herself in testimony and original actions giving rise to the case; and very politely simply concluded that “BREA had not met the burden of proof” for one single charge or allegation.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/BREA-corruption-appraiser-abuse">BREA the Energizer Bunny of Appraiser Abuse</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/BREA-corruption-appraiser-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18211</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Approach Booklet &#038; Instructions</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/cost-approach-booklet-instructions</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/cost-approach-booklet-instructions#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculation worksheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craftsman Book Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FREE Cost Approach calculation worksheet&#8230; Appraisers, Many use Building-Cost.net as a source for completing residential Cost Approach details in appraisal reports. Craftsman Book Company is the owner of this service, and the web site offers a FREE Cost Approach calculation worksheet, which can be printed to PDF and included in reports, and also a printed hardcopy for the workfile if desired. I began using and promoting this web site years ago. Not long ago, the web site above was updated, to provide more specific reporting items, which in turn enables a more accurate and professional looking Cost Approach to be&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/cost-approach-booklet-instructions">Cost Approach Booklet &#038; Instructions</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/cost-approach-booklet-instructions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13980</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract Amendments&#8230; When?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/contract-amendments-appraisal-updates</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/contract-amendments-appraisal-updates#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Amendments to Sales Contract &#038; Updates to the Appraisal&#8230; Fannie Mae recently issued the following: Currently, we require the lender to provide the appraiser with all amendments made to a sales contract, including amendments that are made after completion of the appraisal. With this update, we have clarified when the appraiser must be provided with updates to the sales contract and circumstances that warrant updates to the appraisal. For example, if the contract is amended in a way that affects the description of the real property used by the appraiser, then the lender must provide the updated contract to the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/contract-amendments-appraisal-updates">Contract Amendments&#8230; When?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/contract-amendments-appraisal-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13969</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendor Agreement Controversies &#038; Worst AMCs</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/worst-amc-vendor-agreement-controversies</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/worst-amc-vendor-agreement-controversies#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraiserLoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester VMS Appraisal Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoesterVMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indemnification Clauses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StreetLinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AMC Vendor Agreement Controversies &#8211; Bad, Worst &#038; Ugly AMCs And the winner is&#8230; According to a recent non-scientific survey conducted by AppraiserNews, the World&#8217;s Worst AMC Alive is Clear Capital. Honorable Mention goes to Coester VMS and Streetlinks. And the Worst Vampire AMC title goes to AppraiserLoft which is no longer operational. Excerpt: We’d also like to note the passion with which appraisers made their votes, describing the many ways that these AMCs deserved their titles! One final remark: It is sad that so many appraisers still hesitate to go public with their comments about AMCs, (justifiably) fearing that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/worst-amc-vendor-agreement-controversies">Vendor Agreement Controversies &#038; Worst AMCs</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/worst-amc-vendor-agreement-controversies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12478</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1004D for Disaster Inspections &#8211; Advice</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/disaster-inspections-1004D</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/disaster-inspections-1004D#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2075]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declared disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspection Condition Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Condition Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When Disaster Happens&#8230; Appraisers, The phrase &#8220;disasters happen&#8221; is, unfortunately, all too common. Fires, floods, vehicle accidents, wind storms, hurricanes, tornadoes are all factors that can affect real property. When a local disaster happens, and is officially declared, lenders often ask appraisers to observe the current condition of their mortgaged properties. The assignment date may be days, weeks or months after the declared disaster. The hiccups, hang-ups and head scratching occurs when the lender or AMC asks for a ‘Disaster Inspection Condition Report’ to be done on the wonderful 1004D form. Something it is not designed to do. And this&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/disaster-inspections-1004D">The 1004D for Disaster Inspections &#8211; Advice</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/disaster-inspections-1004D/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11691</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraiser Expert Witness Issue</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-expert-witness-issue</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-expert-witness-issue#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Christensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Discovery of Draft Expert Witness Reports (Draft Appraisals) in State Court &#8211; a Chart Appraiser Michael Brunson, SRA, MNAA, and I recently wrote an article for the Appraisal Institute&#8216;s 4th Quarter 2015 edition of Valuation entitled “Getting Ready for Expert Witness Work: 10 Practice Pointers.” One of the pointers is that while the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule 26) now generally protect a retained expert witness&#8217;s draft reports (e.g., draft appraisals) from discovery by the opposing party, appraisers need to understand that if a litigation is pending in state court and thus subject to the state&#8217;s rules of civil&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-expert-witness-issue">Appraiser Expert Witness Issue</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-expert-witness-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9807</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Open Letter to the Valuation Profession</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/an-open-letter-to-the-valuation-profession/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/an-open-letter-to-the-valuation-profession/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8915</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An Open Letter to the Valuation Profession from the Appraisal Foundation regarding the rift with the Appraisal Institute Value. Appraisers grapple with this concept daily as they analyze data and information to arrive at an opinion that is credible. Some information found is valid, some is tainted, and appraisers work diligently to separate the good from the bad to arrive at their conclusions – opinions that can withstand future tests. Likewise, The Appraisal Foundation (TAF; the Foundation) remains constantly attuned to what is going on in the valuation realm, conscientiously analyzing information and working to uphold the appraisal profession so its actions&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/an-open-letter-to-the-valuation-profession/">An Open Letter to the Valuation Profession</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/an-open-letter-to-the-valuation-profession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8915</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workfile With Submitted Appraisal Reports?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-you-include-your-workfile-with-your-submitted-appraisal-reports/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-you-include-your-workfile-with-your-submitted-appraisal-reports/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LenderVend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provident Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Should You Include Your Workfile With Your Submitted Appraisal Reports? Appraisers, On several forums frequented by real estate appraisers, there has been recent discussions about a particular Appraisal Management Company (AMC) owned by a lender who is requiring appraisers to include their ENTIRE WORKFILE with every appraisal report submitted (as of 5/21/2015). The AMC is LenderVend, owned by Provident Funding. One reason why this has come to the forefront is because Provident Funding has had to buy back numerous loans due to alleged faulty appraisals and other underwriting issues. So by demanding the appraiser’s workfile, they are attempting to protect themselves&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-you-include-your-workfile-with-your-submitted-appraisal-reports/">Workfile With Submitted Appraisal Reports?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-you-include-your-workfile-with-your-submitted-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7523</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Serial” Podcast &#038; Your Appraisal Workfile</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-serial-podcast-and-your-appraisal-workfile/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-serial-podcast-and-your-appraisal-workfile/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Podcast a growing medium Podcasts are a growing medium for both education and entertainment. Research shows it has grown over 25% per year for the past few years. As an appraiser, I find myself spending a lot of time at my computer as well as traveling to and from appraisal inspections. I discovered podcasting about a year ago and have not turned on talk radio since. Podcasting allows me to specifically pick the topics I want to hear and listen to them when I have the time to listen. I love ‘em. Recently, a few friends of mine turned me&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-serial-podcast-and-your-appraisal-workfile/">“Serial” Podcast &#038; Your Appraisal Workfile</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-serial-podcast-and-your-appraisal-workfile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7130</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If I Cannot Support a Small Adjustment, I Just do not Make it</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I am more circumspect about the adjustments I make. The most feared date in the appraisal industry has come. January 26, 2015 arrived with much trepidation and trembling amongst myself and my appraiser colleagues. The day of the Collateral Underwriter (CU) had finally arrived. Yet, it turned out to be a pretty typical day for most. We are now over a week removed from the CU and I have yet to receive even one CU-related revision request. I guess that means one of two things; either I am an incredibly talented appraiser who uses all the best comps and supports every one&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/">If I Cannot Support a Small Adjustment, I Just do not Make it</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/if-i-cannot-support-a-small-adjustment-i-just-do-not-make-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6993</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Data Collective Launches “Shift”</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/national-data-collective-launches-shift-an-exclusive-a-la-mode-total-integration-tool/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/national-data-collective-launches-shift-an-exclusive-a-la-mode-total-integration-tool/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Stewart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Data Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WinTotal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>National Data Collective Launches “Shift” an Exclusive a la mode TOTAL Integration Tool February 2, 2015 San Diego, CA — Today, NDC (National Data Collective), a leading national provider of property data for real estate professionals, has released a new and improved export tool for a la mode customers only called Shift. Shift allows NDC users to export NDC’s highly-rated collective property data directly into a la mode’s industry leading form filling software with just a push of a button. The tool is compatible with the legacy WinTOTAL system, TOTAL 2013, and the upcoming release of the next-generation TOTAL Titan.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/national-data-collective-launches-shift-an-exclusive-a-la-mode-total-integration-tool/">National Data Collective Launches “Shift”</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/national-data-collective-launches-shift-an-exclusive-a-la-mode-total-integration-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6938</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Services to Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-la-mode-and-national-data-collective-form-partnership-to-offer-real-estate-data-services-to-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-la-mode-and-national-data-collective-form-partnership-to-offer-real-estate-data-services-to-appraisers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Data Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WinTotal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>a la mode and National Data Collective Form Partnership to Offer Real Estate Data Services to Appraisers November 10, 2014 — Naples, FL — a la mode announced today that NDC (National Data Collective), a leading national provider of property data services for real estate professionals, has agreed to integrate its data services with a la mode’s full range of appraisal formfilling systems. NDC offers a subscription-based data service to appraisers covering more than 130 million properties in all 50 states, with full property profiles, assessor records, deed history and comparables data. Its products are available on desktop and mobile&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-la-mode-and-national-data-collective-form-partnership-to-offer-real-estate-data-services-to-appraisers/">Data Services to Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-la-mode-and-national-data-collective-form-partnership-to-offer-real-estate-data-services-to-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6698</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adjustments &#8211; Your Opinion Doesn’t Count</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Hagar, SRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulations state that appraisal adjustments cannot be based upon an appraiser’s opinion. According to federal and state law, adjustments must be based on support and evidence- proof if you will, and an appraiser’s opinion is not considered to be &#8220;support.&#8221; Many appraisers have failed to support their adjustments and as a result have had their licenses revoked, penalties assessed and lawsuits lost, all because the they failed to understand a single but important requirement. Think about your appraisals. Are the adjustments based on your opinion or do you have proof of the adjustment in your workfile? Then one day I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/">Adjustments &#8211; Your Opinion Doesn’t Count</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6618</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
