<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Mexico Appraiser’s Coalition - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/new-mexico-appraisers-coalition-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/new-mexico-appraisers-coalition-2/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Appraisers Participation Needed &#8211; Tackling BPO &#038; CU Issues</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-participation-needed-tackling-bpo-cu-issues/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-participation-needed-tackling-bpo-cu-issues/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Appraiser’s Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The appraisal industry was blindsided once again only this time by the AG’s office when they determined that the Real Estate Appraiser Board cannot regulate BPO&#8217;s. The New Mexico Appraiser’s Coalition and the Rio Grande Chapter of the Appraisal Institute sent a joint letter to the Appraisal Board prior to a hearing that was held in January to discuss the BPO language in the Appraiser Act. Although we feel we provided enough information to guide the Board, the Attorney General Representative at the meeting made the determination that the Appraisal Board had no jurisdiction over the BPO product. Even though&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-participation-needed-tackling-bpo-cu-issues/">Appraisers Participation Needed &#8211; Tackling BPO &#038; CU Issues</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-participation-needed-tackling-bpo-cu-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8063</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
