<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mc form - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/mc-form/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/mc-form/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 21:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Need for Speed? Hybrids are NOT the Answer!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AMC-vs-direct-lender-ordered-appraisals-TATs</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/AMC-vs-direct-lender-ordered-appraisals-TATs#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;surveys indicate that appraisals ordered directly by lenders take much less time&#8230; Dear Colleagues, There is a current narrative that appraisals take too long and cost the consumer too much! Does this sound accurate? Preliminary coalition surveys indicate that appraisals ordered directly by lenders take much less time than appraisals ordered by AMCs. Additionally, the cost of Hybrid Appraisals has been disclosed in reports as $495 being paid to the AMC. How is this a savings to the consumer? They get an inferior valuation product and pay the same price as a full appraisal. Who is truly benefiting from this scenario? Fannie&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AMC-vs-direct-lender-ordered-appraisals-TATs">Need for Speed? Hybrids are NOT the Answer!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/AMC-vs-direct-lender-ordered-appraisals-TATs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret Revealed&#8230; Coming NOT Soon</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/UAD-appraisal-forms-redesign-initiative</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/UAD-appraisal-forms-redesign-initiative#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New initiative will focus on modernization of the current UAD dataset and residential appraisal forms&#8230; What I originally described as a ‘rumor’ several months ago has finally been fully exposed. FNMA and FrMAC are in the process of examining the current GSE appraisal forms, which encompass UAD and the MC Form, to ‘finally’ get the appraisal forms &#38; functions into the 21st Century! But it won’t happen for at least 3 years (2021)&#8230; by then many current appraisers will be enjoying bon-bons and brewskies while on the golf course, or be on their long-planned world cruise, after chucking their clipboard&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/UAD-appraisal-forms-redesign-initiative">Secret Revealed&#8230; Coming NOT Soon</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/UAD-appraisal-forms-redesign-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18090</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor &#8211; GSE Forms Revisions Coming?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GSE’s “really want your input” on the proposed revisions&#8230; Folks, Rumor has it that the GSE’s are ‘finally’ considering making revisions to the current appraisal report forms. I suspect there have been draft forms already produced, and possibly are actually being tested in a cave somewhere in the Appalachian Mountains wilderness or perhaps inside Yucca Mountain, Nevada. But rumor has it that the GSE’s “really want your input” on the proposed revisions. But how to do that is not revealed in the rumor. This is something to keep at least one eye observing over the next many weeks, months,or maybe&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored">Rumor &#8211; GSE Forms Revisions Coming?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/GSE-forms-revisions-coming-rumored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17348</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Machholz Hangs up his Clipboard</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/retired-don-macholz-shares-excel-templates</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/retired-don-macholz-shares-excel-templates#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser distance measurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser measurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions Addendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We owe a huge debt of gratitude to Don Machholz for his willingness to assist appraisers&#8230; Appraisers, A well respected appraiser who has voluntarily helped many of us has decided to hang up his clipboard, and remove the batteries from his laser measurer. I first became aware of Don Machholz back when the screwball GSE designed MC form was introduced in 2009. Don was one of the first appraisers who used his skills with Excel programming to design and distribute an Excel computation spreadsheet for the MC. Many appraisers have been using that, and his other Excel spreadsheets, ever since.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/retired-don-macholz-shares-excel-templates">Don Machholz Hangs up his Clipboard</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/retired-don-macholz-shares-excel-templates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17211</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Evaluations&#8230; Good or Bad</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/alternative-evaluations-good-bad</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/alternative-evaluations-good-bad#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Pratt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>All of these &#34;alternative evaluations&#34; are an attempt to reduce the fee of the appraiser&#8230; All this talk about alternatives to a full appraisal needs some common business sense added to the conversation. At the end of these comments I will include some of my background and you can make your decision if you think I am qualified to put my 2 cents in this discussion. I have said this before and I will say it again, the lenders (AMC included) just want an Appraisers signature and their E&#038;O insurance with a value and they want it as cheap as&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/alternative-evaluations-good-bad">Alternative Evaluations&#8230; Good or Bad</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/alternative-evaluations-good-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quit Overreporting!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why Do Appraisers Keep Overreporting&#8230;? Appraisers, Another friend has provided a copy of an appraisal on the friend’s home. Good golly, miss Molly&#8230; Why do appraisers keep overreporting comparable property data, which really isn’t comparable? This subject property is an 1,100 sq.ft. single story home, in a near-beach side community, with partial marine view, not on WFT, in a suburban location. Similar ‘comps’ are extremely limited (no more than 6 sales and 2 listings) due to its GLA, location, age, etc., based on the appraiser’s report, and my own research from multiple searches which proved similar comparable properties are almost non-existent. The report&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting">Quit Overreporting!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15808</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rules Check Software</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/comps-rules-check-software</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/comps-rules-check-software#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value range]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If the ‘story’ can be told using 3 comps, why are 4 or more really necessary? Folks, As you are probably aware, all of our appraisal reports receive an initial examination electronically. There are a number of businesses which have written and provide to the industry various types of ‘rules check software.’ This actually began in the early 1980’s by the appraisal computer software pioneers who wrote programs to ‘check’ reports for inconsistencies. I just learned about one such ‘rules check’ company, and the results they’ve seen using their software &#8211; below. They even admit to users that the users can ‘mine’ reports&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/comps-rules-check-software">Rules Check Software</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/comps-rules-check-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13712</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Do You Suppose Might Have Caused This?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-conditions-geographic-competency</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-conditions-geographic-competency#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographic competency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In my area, the Market Conditions data is basically worthless. Folks, One of the data analysis aspects I do in all reports is research sales trends of comparable properties, using MLS data, and making a graph to show report readers the actual market activity that has occurred over a long real estate cycle&#8230;usually 4-5 years back from the Effective Date. I use this to supplement, but not replace, the cruddy Market Conditions form, which poorly accounts for only 12 months of activity. In my area, the Market Conditions data is basically worthless. I’m sharing this because in the 8 years&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/market-conditions-geographic-competency">What Do You Suppose Might Have Caused This?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-conditions-geographic-competency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12658</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACI Sky Causing Distress for Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/aci-sky-causing-distress-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/aci-sky-causing-distress-appraisers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions Addendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Are you giving in to ACI Sky? An appraiser who will remain anonymous tells us&#8230; “within the last week, I have had two issue of concerns with &#8220;UAD” compliance and ACI Sky Delivery ( I can hardly write that; as, it is a significant source of stress when I have to deal with it). I have tried to submit reports, with issues that prevented the upload (no surprise with “Sky”). The first involved the 1004MC form. The comparables that were available for the subject were extremely minimal – something like 4-6. The last period only included 1 comparable (no valid&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/aci-sky-causing-distress-appraisers/">ACI Sky Causing Distress for Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/aci-sky-causing-distress-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12414</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MC Form &#038; Incorrect Reporting of DATA</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/mc-form-incorrect-reporting-data/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/mc-form-incorrect-reporting-data/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions Addendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, Wednesday last week (11/18/15) WorkingRE published, via their e-Newsletter, an article I submitted to them as an &#8216;exclusive.&#8217;  I was in a jet to Las Vegas to attend the Appraisal Summit &#38; Expo that day.  In case you did not see the article, I’m letting you know about it here. You can access the WorkingRE version of the article here. I want to thank those appraisers who left comments on the WorkingRE site, included below the article, and to those appraisers who wrote me directly. Getting feedback is critical, and appreciated. And kudos to Isaac Peck, Editor and David Brauner, Publisher,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/mc-form-incorrect-reporting-data/">MC Form &#038; Incorrect Reporting of DATA</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/mc-form-incorrect-reporting-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9428</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down the Rabbit Hole with the Form 1004MC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-the-form-1004mc/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-the-form-1004mc/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian L. Trotrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions Addendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I admit it. I am old school. I still think you need to understand how to do something manually before you throw caution to the wind and buy into new technology to replace a good, old-fashioned, hands-on process that has worked fine for years. I honestly believe the use of technology without a complete understanding of how to do the basic process manually just lets us make more frequent and more complicated mistakes faster. In other words, if you can’t drive a Chevy Nova very well, don’t buy a Maserati Ghibli and expect it to fix your driving problems.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-the-form-1004mc/">Down the Rabbit Hole with the Form 1004MC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-the-form-1004mc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6660</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danger of 1004MC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/danger-of-1004mc/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/danger-of-1004mc/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions Addendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=1121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>1004MC : Danger! If you conduct appraisals for residential lending, you are familiar with the 1004MC. Many appraisers rely upon the data which populates the form for conclusions (e.g., trends for Property Values and Prices, relationship between Supply &#38; Demand, etc.) which are later communicated on page 1 of a Fannie Mae appraisal report form. Of course, the data and analysis in the 1004MC are, in part, used by the appraiser in analysis in the Sales Comparison Approach. What could go wrong with this scenario? The correct answer is plenty, resulting in the appraiser communicating misleading opinions and conclusions. What&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/danger-of-1004mc/">Danger of 1004MC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/danger-of-1004mc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1121</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
