<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ICAP - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/icap-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/icap-2/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 04:15:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Reconsider the Rule on Deferred Appraisals</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interim Final Rule]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAP commented on the impending Interim Final Rule that will allow real estate appraisals to be deferred for 120 days for certain real estate transactions. The letter states that the deferment could lead to several unsettling possibilities. The letter implores the agencies to reconsider this rule. Now is not the time to walk away from safety measures meant to insure the present and future movement of real estate, but to embrace them. Public Trust is the appraiser’s primary concern. To not have this certified and insured professional involved at the outset of real estate lending during this time, in some&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule">Reconsider the Rule on Deferred Appraisals</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/letter-imploring-agencies-to-reconsider-deferred-appraisals-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23913</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Considered an Essential Business</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Under the order, “essential businesses” cover a wide variety of workers&#8230;Appraisers are considered an essential business&#8230; Illinois Governor Issues Stay-at-Home Order. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker today issued a “stay at home” order for the entire state starting Saturday March 21, 2020, at 5 p.m. through April 7. The order encourages all “essential businesses and operations” to remain open. Appraisers are considered an essential business The order encourages all “essential businesses and operations” to remain open, but directs them to enforce six-foot social distancing for both employees and customers. Under the order, “essential businesses” cover a wide variety of workers, including&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order">Appraisers Considered an Essential Business</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-considered-essential-business-coronavirus-stay-at-home-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23707</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Evaluations: Concept Paper, Webinar, Public Meeting In early August, The Appraisal Foundation announced that the The Appraisal Standards Board would be considering adopting standards for evaluations in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). On September 3, 2019, they announced three opportunities to learn more and share your insights. Concept Paper The Appraisal Standards Board is seeking your feedback on the concept of developing standards for performing evaluations in USPAP. Submit your comments to ASBcomments@appraisalfoundation.org. The comment period closes on October 11, 2019. Read the evaluations concept paper here Webinar Wayne Miller, chair of the Appraisal Standards Board, and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella">Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="http://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NPR-appraisal-threshold.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22659</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Committee Passes H.R. 3619</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCUA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>H.R. 3619 has passed out of committee and is now sitting in the US House for consideration. H.R.3619 would amend the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 to provide the Appraisal Subcommittee with the authority to modify annual registry fees for appraisal management companies, to maintain a registry of trainees and charge a lower trainee registry fee, and to allow grants to States to assist appraiser and potential appraiser compliance with the Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and would require AMCs to disclose their fees. The NCUA Quadrupled The Appraisal Threshold For Nonresidential Real Estate Loans By a 2-1&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure">Committee Passes H.R. 3619</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/committee-passes-hr3619-committee-passes-hr3619-amc-fee-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22470</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Race Baked into Big Data?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declining market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Chicago appraiser and friend (even though she calls me “fancy pants”) writes a stellar explanation of what an appraiser actual does – and what one of the panel experts got completely wrong because he didn’t understand our role in the mortgage process: Greetings Congresswoman Waters, Chairman Clay, Ranking Member Duffy, Ranking Member Gooden, and the Members of the Housing Subcommittee: My name is Maureen Sweeney, and I am a real estate appraiser. I grew up in a real estate family and lived through the savings and loan crisis of the 1980’s, which had a profound impact on my life. I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data">Is Race Baked into Big Data?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22268</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customary and Reasonable Fees?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-firm-owners-fix-low-appraisal-fees</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-firm-owners-fix-low-appraisal-fees#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;appraisal firm owners roll up your sleeves &#38; hold the line on fees&#8230; I have been the owner of HF Appraisal Ltd since 1993 and I have sat on the sidelines in regards to Customary and Reasonable appraisal fees. I can no longer stand by and read nor hear about this issue. It is amazing to me that over the past five to ten years our fees have remained the same and in some cases are lower than they were 10 years ago. The more that I read about this and talk to appraisers across the country in classes and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-firm-owners-fix-low-appraisal-fees">Customary and Reasonable Fees?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-firm-owners-fix-low-appraisal-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21360</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Requests for Reconsiderations</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;appraisers continue to receive requests for reconsiderations on a daily basis. White Paper: Requests for Reconsiderations The paper states that one factor that complicates requests for revisions is that there are no consistent industrywide policies, guidelines, or forms related to this process. Furthermore, over recent years there have been changes in statute and policy with respect to appraiser independence obligations, which has resulted in some confusion among users of appraisal services (and appraisers) as to exactly what may be asked and provided in such requests. It is important to distinguish these requests from a request to make corrections or address&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations">Requests for Reconsiderations</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/requests-4-reconsiderations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20370</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulators&#8217; Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement on Some Home Sales of $400,000 and Below&#8230; The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve released a proposal that would increase the appraisal requirement from $250,000 to $400,000, meaning that certain home sales of $400,000 and below would no longer require an appraisal. According to data provided by the FDIC, the agencies estimate that increasing the appraisal threshold from $250,000 to $400,000 would have exempted an additional 214,000 residential mortgages at regulated institutions from the agencies’ appraisal requirement in&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement">Proposal to End Appraisal Requirement</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-proposal-2-end-appraisal-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20222</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Take on Washington DC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids were a big topic &#038; many regulators are concerned about their compliance&#8230; Independent Fee appraisers representing 15 different states were well represented in Washington DC this past weekend. Appraisers from  Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Ohio, Louisiana, California, Illinois, South Dakota, Michigan, Utah, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland and Washington State joined together in DC for several gatherings. To sum it up simply&#8230; Positive Unity among all. On Friday, three members of VaCAP attended the Appraisal Standards Board Meeting. This meeting was live streamed, so hopefully you were able to watch live. Lots of discussions on the proposed changes to the 2020-2021&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together">Appraisers Take on Washington DC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19637</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pushing Back Against Appraisal Waivers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waivers-pushback</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waivers-pushback#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounts receivables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI &#38; 37 Appraisal Organizations pushing back against Appraisal Waivers&#8230; Clarification on Treasure Valley Factors: Last week we shared with you information about Treasure Valley Factors no longer accepting invoices from Managed Appraisal Services. Many interpreted this to mean Treasure Valley Factors was no longer accepting appraisal management companies&#8217; invoices. This is not correct. Managed Appraisal Service, Inc. is an Appraisal Management Company located in Horsham, PA. It is this company&#8217;s invoices Treasure Valley Factors is no longer accepting. Treasure Valley Factors is still accepting invoices from other Appraisal Management Companies. Treasure Valley Factors reviews each company individually and makes decisions&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waivers-pushback">Pushing Back Against Appraisal Waivers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waivers-pushback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15318</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Waiver Programs&#8230; A Risky Business</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Inspection Waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAP (and 36 other industry groups) signed a Letter To The Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Over The New Appraisal Waiver Programs ICAP along with 36 other industry groups signed a letter to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs to raise concern over the new appraisal waiver programs recently implemented by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (the “Government Sponsored Enterprises.”) The letter states that these programs will create unnecessary and unacceptable risks for taxpayers and homeowners, and they come at a time when markets are at all-time highs &#8211; when risk mitigation should be tantamount. The&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns">Appraisal Waiver Programs&#8230; A Risky Business</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-programs-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15301</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Appraisal De Minimis Proposal</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFIEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paperwork Reduction Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposal To Increase The Appraisal Threshold On Commercial Real Estate Loans The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Joint Report to Congress said the federal banking agencies are developing a proposal to increase the threshold for requiring an appraisal on commercial real estate loans from $250,000 to $400,000. The report did not propose changes to the current residential real estate threshold of $250,000. In addition, the agencies recognize that appraisals can provide protection to consumers by helping to assure the residential purchaser that the value of the property supports the mortgage amount assumed. Overall, the agencies believe that the interests of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase">Commercial Appraisal De Minimis Proposal</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/commercial-appraisal-threshold-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14011</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey about FHA Assignments</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-assignments-survey</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-assignments-survey#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 12:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tell them what it will take to get you to re-start FHA assignments. FHA Appraisers, A new &#8216;attitude&#8217; survey about doing FHA assignments has been prepared by the Illinois Coalition of Appraiser Professionals (ICAP). ICAP has a planned meeting with FHA, and will use survey results in their discussion. ICAP has asked that I distribute this, and by association, anyone who gets this may re-distribute via any other outlet, email list, etc. Link to the survey. It will take 4 minutes +/- to do this survey, depending on if you add additional comments at the end. One item the survey&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-assignments-survey">Survey about FHA Assignments</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-assignments-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11994</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desirable, Rite or Rong?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/desirable-undesirable-banned-fannie-mae-words</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/desirable-undesirable-banned-fannie-mae-words#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Desirable, banned or permitted? I was caught up in a minor ‘dispute’ last week when a review appraiser wacked my knuckles when I described a ‘neighborhood’ as being “Desirable.” My original message was re-distributed on various forums and I’ve tried to read all comments to see how I might learn from this episode. Lots of appraisers offered their input. Some supportive and positive, some cautionary, and some who believe much of what we have to deal with is pretty trivial. “Banned words” were originally identified in the Fair Housing Act law many years ago (not the EEOC law as I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/desirable-undesirable-banned-fannie-mae-words">Desirable, Rite or Rong?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/desirable-undesirable-banned-fannie-mae-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11235</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Should CU be Transparent&#8221; Survey Results</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FNMA’s CU is causing a big industry ruckus. ICAP member Keith Wolf, SRA, AI-RRS, created a survey in January because opinions being posted across multiple message boards and blogs are fragmented. The results of this survey are out and show that a vast majority of appraisers believe Fannie Mae CU should be transparent. Nearly 70 percent of appraisers said that they will increase fees to cover the extra work CU may cause and 80 percent believe that CU risk scores will cause lenders and AMC clients to request appraisers to fit comps to the CU model. Also 73 percent believe that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/">&#8220;Should CU be Transparent&#8221; Survey Results</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent-survey-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7004</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should CU be Transparent?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FNMA’s CU is causing a BIG industry ruckus. Opinions are fragmented, being posted across multiple message boards and blogs. Please complete the attached survey created by ICAP member Keith Wolf, SRA, AI-RRS so we can tabulate the responses and distribute to all. We are reaching out across the country, so please feel free to forward the survey. The survey will remain open until January 31, 2015. The Appraisal Industry as a consolidated group thanks everyone for their participation in completing the survey. This survey has expired surveymonkey.com/s/S6DDVJN</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/">Should CU be Transparent?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/should-cu-be-transparent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6908</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to UAD Data</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to Data They Provided Through the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) Fellow appraiser, I am asking that you to take a moment to participate in this important industry effort. Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU) will be available in the first half of 2015. The CU performs automated risk assessment of appraisals submitted to the Uniform Collateral Data Portal based on information that you provided through the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD). The CU provides a risk score, flags, and messages to the lender. The GSE’s have mandated that all appraisals be submitted in the UAD format; however, currently&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/">Online Petition to Allow appraiser Access to UAD Data</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/online-petition-to-allow-appraiser-access-to-data-they-provided-through-the-uniform-appraisal-dataset-uad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6692</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Meeting of State Appraiser Organizations</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/historic-meeting-of-state-appraiser-organizations/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/historic-meeting-of-state-appraiser-organizations/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AAREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Association of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Association of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Coalition of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSCAPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Real Estate Appraiser Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina Professional Appraisers Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Council of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WVCAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Representatives of several independent state professional appraiser organizations met in Chicago, Illinois on Saturday October 11th, to further discuss collaboration on issues affecting their membership. The network, which started as a conversation among three State appraiser organizations less than a year ago, now comprises 16 such State Organizations which is expected to continue growing. The group, which functions as a network rather than a formal organization is unique in its focus and operation. The network has no single elected leader but is comprised of leaders from each participating state organization; it is self-governing by consensus. Participating organizations do not pay&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/historic-meeting-of-state-appraiser-organizations/">Historic Meeting of State Appraiser Organizations</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/historic-meeting-of-state-appraiser-organizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6644</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Considers Bill to Clarify BPOs, CMAs</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/illinois-considers-bill-to-clarify-bpos-cmas/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/illinois-considers-bill-to-clarify-bpos-cmas/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker price opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Market Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When and how BPOs and CMAs may be performed by brokers &#038; managing brokers Legislation that would clarify several aspects of an Illinois law governing broker price opinions and comparative market analysis has passed the state legislature and currently is under consideration by Gov. Pat Quinn, the Appraisal Institute reported July 23. SB 3044 adds definitions of both BPOs and CMAs to the state’s Real Estate Appraiser Licensing Act and its Real Estate Licensing Act, and clarifies when and how BPOs and CMAs may be performed by brokers and managing brokers. The bill was sent to Quinn June 27, and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/illinois-considers-bill-to-clarify-bpos-cmas/">Illinois Considers Bill to Clarify BPOs, CMAs</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/illinois-considers-bill-to-clarify-bpos-cmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6386</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Letter to ASB</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Statement Letter to the ASB The purpose of USPAP is to promote and maintain a high level of public trust in establishing requirements for appraisals and &#8220;reliable&#8221; valuations. The problems is, however, that it is subjective. Assuming one can support the conclusion or opinion; beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or in this case, the appraiser. Likewise, evaluation and selection is in the eye of the appraiser &#8211; which is why two different and reasonable and competent appraisers can reach two different, but equally credible opinions, on the same property. And that is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/">My Main USPAP Issue &#8211; Letter to ASB</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/my-main-uspap-issue-statement-letter-to-the-asb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4929</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
