<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hypothetical Condition - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/hypothetical-condition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/hypothetical-condition/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 04:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Computershare Reviews &#038; Cheap Diapers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computershare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The resulting &#8220;outcome&#8221; of those cheap diapers is the same outcome as Computershare 15-minute reviews must be&#8230; This didn’t start out as an article, but you know me. Doing research prior to posting in the 100% comments board I was shocked at how pervasive this new &#8216;service&#8217; already is. A simple blog post can’t begin to cover it. Every single reader needs to research their own states requirements. The AMC at the following link makes this easy. Please look your state up. My concern was with Computershare and Colorado. Feel free to look them up by clicking here. If that doesn’t&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers">Computershare Reviews &#038; Cheap Diapers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22648</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 Minutes?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>$15 USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 minutes? A VaCAP member shared with us something they read in an appraiser group on Facebook last week and expressed concern. We agree there is a reason to be concerned and want to alert our members to be cautious. We do not know if the source of this request is an amc or a lender, but either way, there is reason for concern. Here is what was shared: “I have been diligently looking for appraisers to complete to do our NEW USPAP reviews. These pay $15 per report and are completed in 10-15 minutes.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes">USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 Minutes?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22638</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is This Something You&#8217;d Do?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/live-work-unit-residence-appraisal</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/live-work-unit-residence-appraisal#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An AMC for a lender contacted a residential appraiser with the request that the appraiser “appraise only the second floor residence” in a two story Live-Work building within a commercial district, where SFR&#8217;s are allowed by zoning. Ground floor area of this Live-Work building is an ice cream &#38; gift shop. The second floor is a fully finished &#38; functional residence. Entire property is being sold. There are numerous legitimate Live-Work buildings in Seattle (and likely elsewhere also). They are properly zoned as such, are listed that way, appraised by using similar type sales &#8211; and mortgaged. Typically these are 2-3&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/live-work-unit-residence-appraisal">Is This Something You&#8217;d Do?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/live-work-unit-residence-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21135</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advance Property Research is Vital</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/assessors-incorrect-legal-description-site-size</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/assessors-incorrect-legal-description-site-size#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plat map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>‘Subject to’ obtaining a correct legal description&#8230; Appraisers, an unusual situation occurred with an appraiser buddy, who asked for advice. After reviewing the details and providing input, I decided that this would be a good ‘teaching moment’ for others. See PDF for images below. Appraiser was asked to do a ‘refi’ assignment for a home that was purchased about 6 months prior by the borrower. The report was completed and turned in. Not long afterward, the appraiser received a ROV request because the borrower felt the value was too low. In the course of this process, the prior appraisal done for the purchase&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/assessors-incorrect-legal-description-site-size">Advance Property Research is Vital</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/assessors-incorrect-legal-description-site-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20982</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road to Perdition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like USPAP and IVS are finally going to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony. Didn’t Coca Cola already do that? It’s been awhile since I’ve harped about the International Valuation Standards (IVS) and the International Valuation Standards Council, or their inappropriate influence on USPAP. Perdition Road paving compliments of The Appraisal Foundation under sub contract to MISMO. Unnecessary Bridging from USPAP to IVS provided by TAF. For those unfamiliar with what (IVS) or who (IVSC) they are, the following link may help. Scroll down to the corporate sponsors section. THIS is who the ‘international sponsors’ are.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS">Road to Perdition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19090</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA &#038; HA Definition Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/extraordinary-assumption-hypothetical-condition-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/extraordinary-assumption-hypothetical-condition-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, effective with the 2018-19 USPAP, definitions for Extraordinary Assumption and Hypothetical Condition have changed. Below is a one page PDF sheet you can print &#38; post at your office, and you may distribute this to others if you like. According to the Appraisal Standards Board, the Extraordinary Assumption change was done to clarify the term and its applicability. It seems the same rationale was used for the Hypothetical Condition definition change, although that was not mentioned in their Summary of Actions document issued on Feb. 23, 2017. Underlined words are the changes made. I also include the prior definitions below&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/extraordinary-assumption-hypothetical-condition-changes">EA &#038; HA Definition Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/extraordinary-assumption-hypothetical-condition-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16427</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What IS a “ClearVal Appraisal”?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Market Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Clear Capital ClearVal&#8230; Value Not So ClearCut&#8230; I’ve finally had an opportunity to read a hybrid ‘appraisal’ start to finish. All may read the unedited, non-redacted version in all its glory&#8230; or infamy, as the case may be. Please click here (report also embedded below) and read it first. I’ll wait right here. Finished? Great. One thing is clear. It is not an appraisal by any current accepted definition that I am familiar with. Ironically, there is also very little that is clear as far as support for the opined values is concerned. (I’m old fashioned and think it should&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal">What IS a “ClearVal Appraisal”?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16340</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraiser&#8217;s Response to LRES Order Blast</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-response-lres-order-blast</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-response-lres-order-blast#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Independence Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bidding game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distressed sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LRES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LRES Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufactured home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market acceptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[room count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>LRES Standard Interior Appraisal Request? Your special requirements and micromanagement of the appraisal process dictate that I charge a fee commensurate with the additional, but typically unnecessary work needed to produce credible results. You are the potential client (agent), so that that is your prerogative and it would be my pleasure to accommodate you as long as appropriate compensation is provided. Respectfully, there is little about your appraisal request that is “standard”. Please explain briefly what you consider to be a ‘standard interior appraisal’. That definition does not appear in The Appraisal Institute’s Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. To be&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-response-lres-order-blast">Appraiser&#8217;s Response to LRES Order Blast</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-response-lres-order-blast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12213</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Contrary Response to The Future of Valuation</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAIFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently an article appeared in WorkingRE about the Future of Valuation. The author is the President of a large and highly respected Appraiser  Peer and Educational Organization.  My own contrary response was either too lengthy, or deemed too critical of a big advertiser for publication in WorkingRE. I thank the hosts of this blog for granting the space. My concern with the author’s views starts with the description of our Real Estate Appraisal profession as &#8216;valuation.&#8217; The concern is more than mere quibbling over semantics. Valuation is the phrase preferred by the Business Valuation community. They have long been dominated&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/">A Contrary Response to The Future of Valuation</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/a-contrary-response-to-the-future-of-valuation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9111</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>USPAP Violations&#8230; This is a list of USPAP violations most commonly encountered by the Texas Appraiser Licensing &#38; Certification Board&#8217;s staff appraiser-investigators when investigating complaints filed with the Board. This list of violations is given for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or instructions on how to properly comply with USPAP or properly complete an appraisal assignment. Most Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations: Sales Comparison Selection of Comparable Properties. Failing to select and/or support the selection of comparable sales using recognized methods and techniques. Examples include: Leaving the subject’s neighborhood when sales data is readily available in the immediate neighborhood; Searching by&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/">Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6401</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>House and Five Acres</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/house-and-five/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/house-and-five/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[five acre parcel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Five acres where? . A house and five is a typical rural/agricultural assignment throughout Illinois. Appraisers who perform these assignments are quick to point out that, “I get these assignments all of the time.” What does USPAP state in the FAQ? 178. APPRAISING PHYSICAL SEGMENTS (5-ACRE PORTION) Question: A local lender has asked me to appraiser only a 5-acre portion of a 62-acre parcel. Am I permitted to comply with this request? Response: Standards Rule 1-2(e)(v) states that the subject of an assignment may be a physical segment of a property. However, appraisers must also comply with any laws, regulations,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/house-and-five/">House and Five Acres</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/house-and-five/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5426</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Permit or Not to Permit</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/to-permit-or-not-to-permit/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/to-permit-or-not-to-permit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unacceptable assignment condition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Excluding additions which may require permit issued by an agency of government&#8230; OK, it isn’t Shakespeare, but, it is something of interest — and concern — to licensed appraisers in Illinois. The concern begins with an appraiser accepting an unusual assignment condition. An AMC, acting on behalf of a lender is demanding that appraisers exclude from the Gross Living Area areas of the subject residence, additions to the original construction unless it is proven that the additions were legally permitted. We must understand that what is asked of the appraiser is not couched in terms of a guideline; this is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/to-permit-or-not-to-permit/">To Permit or Not to Permit</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/to-permit-or-not-to-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2419</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 &#8211; 2013 USPAP Now Available</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-uspap-2012-2013-now-available/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-uspap-2012-2013-now-available/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=1393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation (TAF) announced that the 2012 &#8211; 13 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) is now available. The 2012-2013 edition of USPAP will be valid for two years, effective January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. According to a TAF press release “the new edition includes the standards of professional practice for all appraisal disciplines as well as guidance from the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) in the form of USPAP Advisory Opinions and USPAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).” As with the prior edition, the new edition includes the standards of professional practice for all&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-uspap-2012-2013-now-available/">2012 &#8211; 2013 USPAP Now Available</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-uspap-2012-2013-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1393</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TAF Preview on USPAP 2012-13 Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/taf-preview-on-uspap-2012-13-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/taf-preview-on-uspap-2012-13-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Video on changes to the 2012-2013 USPAP The Appraisal Foundation recently released a video on changes to the 2012-2013 USPAP adopted on April 8, 2011. The purpose of this 23 minute video is to provide appraisers with advanced notice of changes to USPAP that could impact their practice. It is not intended to be a substitute for the 7 hour National USPAP update course. Summary of changes adopted includes: Revisions to the definitions of &#8220;Client&#8221;, &#8220;Extraordinary Assumptions&#8221;, Hypothetical Condition&#8221; and a new definition of &#8220;Exposure Time&#8221; Revisions relating to Development &#38; Disclosure of Exposure Time Opinion Revisions to Standards Rules&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/taf-preview-on-uspap-2012-13-changes/">TAF Preview on USPAP 2012-13 Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/taf-preview-on-uspap-2012-13-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">865</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
