<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exposure Time - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/exposure-time/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Alleged Systemic Racism in Appraisal Myth</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/alleged-systemic-racism-in-appraisal-myth</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/alleged-systemic-racism-in-appraisal-myth#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 12:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American National Standards Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In virtually every single case of alleged racism to hit the media recently, admitted staged events were in play. One could argue staging was necessary to identify if a valuation difference resulted from perceptions of what race the occupants are. Fair enough. Provided that the staging itself does not alter the value scenarios. Provided that the results are being honestly reported. I’m skeptical. I’ve researched each case as far as can reasonably be done from the information provided. The American Guild of Appraisers has also offered (repeatedly) to conduct thorough reviews of each and every appraisal involved in the reported&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/alleged-systemic-racism-in-appraisal-myth">Alleged Systemic Racism in Appraisal Myth</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/alleged-systemic-racism-in-appraisal-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25286</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Mueller Report has surfaced. The report is a Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report and it was given to an appraiser as a sample. This one raises more questions than the last one! The photos from the property inspection do not tell the appraiser one thing. The photos are dark and the repairs the inspector states are needed, simply are not seen in the photos. It begs the question, does the appraiser have adequate information to complete a credible appraisal? Now take a look at the Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal report. Pull up the report and follow along. Some things have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP">Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21229</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crystal Ball &#038; PFA Techniques</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-trends-reporting-techniques</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-trends-reporting-techniques#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PFA figures &#38; opaque crystal balls don’t work when reporting market trends! Nor does the MC Form! Appraisers, by now you’ve heard that FNMA finally has decided that their 1004MC form is basically worthless. That form is no longer required in appraisal reports for properties sold to FNMA, as of August 7, 2018. poorly designed form which never has reported accurate trends&#8230;However, sidekicks in mortgage lending have not come to the same conclusion&#8230; yet. Hopefully, in short time, they will also remove the MC ‘inclusion’ requirement in reports of this awful, poorly designed form which never has reported accurate trends – despite the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/market-trends-reporting-techniques">Crystal Ball &#038; PFA Techniques</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/market-trends-reporting-techniques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18917</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What IS a “ClearVal Appraisal”?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Market Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Clear Capital ClearVal&#8230; Value Not So ClearCut&#8230; I’ve finally had an opportunity to read a hybrid ‘appraisal’ start to finish. All may read the unedited, non-redacted version in all its glory&#8230; or infamy, as the case may be. Please click here (report also embedded below) and read it first. I’ll wait right here. Finished? Great. One thing is clear. It is not an appraisal by any current accepted definition that I am familiar with. Ironically, there is also very little that is clear as far as support for the opined values is concerned. (I’m old fashioned and think it should&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal">What IS a “ClearVal Appraisal”?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16340</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Eval or Not to Eval</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluation-versus-appraisal</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluation-versus-appraisal#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An evaluation, when performed by an individual acting as an appraiser, is an appraisal&#8230; Recently, a document entitled, The Interagency Advisory on Use of Evaluations in Real Estate-Related Financial Transactions was released. Many in the lending and appraisal professions see this as a federal permission slip for evaluations to be completed by Illinois Certified Appraisers. The document reiterates what we already know about evaluations: Under the appraisal regulations, the following transaction types do not require an appraisal, but do require an evaluation: Transactions in which the “transaction value” (generally the loan amount) is $250,000 or less; Certain renewals, refinances, or other transactions involving&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluation-versus-appraisal">To Eval or Not to Eval</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluation-versus-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12191</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP Updates &#038; Revisions Appraisers, On Feb 6, the Appraisal Standards Board finalized the upcoming changes to the next issue of USPAP. See the PDF for the actual document. The highlights are: Revisions adopted for 2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP The following changes were adopted by the Board in a public meeting on February 6, 2015, and will be incorporated in the 2016 &#8211; 17 edition of USPAP and associated guidance material with an effective date of January 1, 2016: Revisions to the RECORD KEEPING RULE Revisions to STANDARD 3 Revisions to the Definition of Assignment Results and Confidential Information and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/">USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7011</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed 2016-17 USPAP Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/comments-requested-for-additional-proposed-2016-17-uspap-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/comments-requested-for-additional-proposed-2016-17-uspap-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Comments Requested for Additional Proposed Changes to USPAP 2016-17 USPA The Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board has issued a third exposure draft of proposed changes to its 2016-17 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and is seeking feedback on the proposed changes by Oct. 10. Among the proposed changes is an adjustment to the definition of report, which currently is defined as “any communication, written or oral, of an appraisal or appraisal review that is transmitted to the client upon completion of an assignment.” The proposed definition would read “Any communication, transmitted to the client or to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/comments-requested-for-additional-proposed-2016-17-uspap-changes/">Proposed 2016-17 USPAP Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/comments-requested-for-additional-proposed-2016-17-uspap-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6557</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rules of Engagement</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/rules-of-engagement/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/rules-of-engagement/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 12:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently a particular engagement letter format has been circulating amongst residential appraisers from several nationally chartered banks. Aside from the usual intended use and exposure time boilerplate requirements there are several new problematic inclusions. Personal Property All personal property transferring in a purchase transaction must be described in the appraisal whether or not it was listed in the sales contract. Any client is free to ask for a shopping list of tchotchkes, but if an appraiser is appraising an abandoned residence with piles of junk laying everywhere&#8230;they couldn’t afford my time to sift through it all like in an episode&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/rules-of-engagement/">Rules of Engagement</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/rules-of-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6242</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance RE Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-guidance-helps-appraisers-analyze-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-guidance-helps-appraisers-analyze-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New Guidance Helps Appraisers Analyze Exposure Time The Appraisal Institute published “Guide Note 14: Concept of Exposure Time” Feb. 12 to help appraisers understand exposure time and how to incorporate its analysis into appraisals. The guidance addresses how appraisers should link exposure time, which refers to the time a property remains on the market, to their value opinion and comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The Guide Note states, “An analysis and opinion of Exposure Time is required for appraisals where the definition of value is tied to a reasonable or stipulated exposure time. A discussion of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-guidance-helps-appraisers-analyze-exposure-time/">Guidance RE Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/new-guidance-helps-appraisers-analyze-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4072</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Sense of Marketing Time and Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Marketing Time Strangely enough, USPAP 2012-2013 does not include a definition of Marketing Time. Marketing Time is only addressed in the Advisory Opinions (AO 7) and the Advise from the ASB is that reasonable marketing time is an opinion of the amount of time that might take to sell a property interest at the concluded market value during the period immediately after the effective date of an appraisal. Exposure Time USPAP requires an opinion of exposure time, not marketing time, when the purpose of the appraisal is to estimate market value. USPAP 2012-2013 defines Exposure Time as the estimated length&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/">Making Sense of Marketing Time and Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2441</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the 2012 USPAP has a new development and reporting requirement? Effective January 1, 2012; when exposure time is a component of the definition for the value opinion being developed, the appraiser must also develop and state in the report an opinion of reasonable exposure time linked to that value opinion. The following is the exact language in the USPAP; DEFINITIONS Exposure Time: estimated length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/">Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2357</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
