<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>executive summary - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/executive-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/executive-summary/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 02:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>FNMA Continued Effort to Get Rid of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-continued-effort-2-get-rid-of-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-continued-effort-2-get-rid-of-appraisers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data collector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fannie Mae Continues Their Effort To Get Rid Of Appraisers: Sends “Tips” For the past year, Fannie Mae has sent unsigned complaints to state appraisal boards; when they see something they don’t like, they write it up and send it to the state. In their recent newsletter, this effort is called “Tips.” They emphasize they are not automated: LQC reviews are not automated. Our expert analysts validate the appraisal results by asking questions like “Do the comparable sale selections make sense?”, “Is the data accurate?”, “Did the appraiser make appropriate adjustments?” and “Are we getting the most probable value?” in&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-continued-effort-2-get-rid-of-appraisers/">FNMA Continued Effort to Get Rid of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fannie-mae-continued-effort-2-get-rid-of-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29984</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Summary in Appraisal Reports</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/executive-summary-appraisal-reports/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/executive-summary-appraisal-reports/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplemental Addendum]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Executive Summary Appraisers, I spent two days last week at the Appraisal Summit and Expo in Las Vegas – which was extremely well planned and presented – co-sponsored by the Columbia Institute and the National Association of Appraisers. Over those two days, in just about every topic presentation seminar, we appraisers were cajoled and implored to improve info we provide in reports to back up our stated value.  We were told that most reports reviewed by lenders are deficient in this aspect.  I admit that my reports need improvement in that kind of presentation – although over the years many&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/executive-summary-appraisal-reports/">Executive Summary in Appraisal Reports</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/executive-summary-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9476</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
