<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DataQuick - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/dataquick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/dataquick/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 06:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Working Paper Credibility Questioned</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataQuick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedonic Regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NO REAL ESTATE APPRAISER IN THE COUNTRY IS ALLOWED TO MISS THE MARK BY 7.8% WITHOUT RISKING LOSS OF LICENSE! The Working Paper demonstrates more than anything else, that given an 8-hour work day the computer will take 6 full working days (1.2 working weeks) to arrive at a result that is at best 7.8% error prone. Office of the Director, Honorable Melvin Watt Federal Housing Finance Agency&#8230; Dear Sir(s) The American Guild of Appraisers is a Guild within the more than 12 1/2 million members, retirees and family members of our parent union OPEIU, AFL/CIO. In addition to representing&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned">Working Paper Credibility Questioned</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17871</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Option DENIED!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tristar-bank-appraisal-waivers-denied</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/tristar-bank-appraisal-waivers-denied#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataQuick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAIFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REVAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TriStar Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>VaCAP has just been informed the TriStar Bank Waiver Request has been DENIED by the ASC. Representatives from VaCap attended the TriStar bank appraisal waiver hearing at the Federal Reserve building in DC this morning. Also present were John Russell with the ASA-NAIFA, Leo Regensburg with the AGA, Bill Garber with the AI, Mark Shiffman with REVAA, appraisers and other stake holders. The board members consisted of Robert Witt with the FHFA, Veronica Spicer representing the CFPB, Richard Taft representing the OCC, and ASC board members. The meeting got off to a late start because the Tri-Star representatives were held&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tristar-bank-appraisal-waivers-denied">Nuclear Option DENIED!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/tristar-bank-appraisal-waivers-denied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17771</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC vs Corelogic</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FTC-vs-corelogic-agreement-impact-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/FTC-vs-corelogic-agreement-impact-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataQuick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall & Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RELS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;how the agreement between CoreLogic and the FTC from 2014 impacts appraisers&#8230; The FTC vs CoreLogic: Why it is important to Appraisers Some appraisers have reached out to VaCAP asking how the agreement between CoreLogic and the FTC from 2014 impacts appraisers. VaCAP wants to highlight the case and provide some key points of reference. The agreement revolves around the purchase of DataQuick by its competitor CoreLogic in 2014. The FTC at that time allowed the transaction with some parameters in which CoreLogic agreed to. See the analysis of the agreement here. A summary of the parameters are below: CoreLogic&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/FTC-vs-corelogic-agreement-impact-appraisers">FTC vs Corelogic</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/FTC-vs-corelogic-agreement-impact-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17653</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CoreLogic to Acquire Marshall &#038; Swift/Boeckh &#038; DataQuick</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/corelogic-to-acquire-marshall-swiftboeckh-dataquick/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/corelogic-to-acquire-marshall-swiftboeckh-dataquick/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic Valuation Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataQuick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall & Swift]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The combination of CoreLogic, MSB and DataQuick should yield significant future growth opportunities&#8230; CoreLogic® (NYSE: CLGX), a leading residential property information, analytics and services provider, today announced the Company has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Marshall &#38; Swift/Boeckh, a leading provider of residential and commercial property valuation solutions to the property and casualty insurance industry, DataQuick Information Systems, a property data and analytics information company, and the credit and flood services operations of DataQuick Lender Solutions from the Decision Insight Information Group (DIIG). Founded in 1930, Marshall &#38; Swift/Boeckh (MSB) is the leading provider of building cost information,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/corelogic-to-acquire-marshall-swiftboeckh-dataquick/">CoreLogic to Acquire Marshall &#038; Swift/Boeckh &#038; DataQuick</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/corelogic-to-acquire-marshall-swiftboeckh-dataquick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4818</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
