<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>concessions - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/concessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/concessions/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 03:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Objectionable Valuations Become Hate Speech, Inflating Home Prices</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/home-prices-soar-amid-the-censorship-campaign-of-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/home-prices-soar-amid-the-censorship-campaign-of-appraisers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bagott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=31274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The censorship, scapegoating and sidelining of appraisers has done real damage to borrowers and the purchasers of bonds&#8230;&#160; Attacks on free speech are on the rise in the English-speaking world. A bill introduced in Canada to thwart online “anarchy and lawlessness” would create a Canadian Ministry of Truth empowered to punish authors Ottawa politicians find problematic. In response to the worst rioting in Britain in years, about 4,000 people have reportedly been jailed for online thought crimes. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to prosecute anyone his government believes is whipping up people’s emotions on the Internet. There’s even&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/home-prices-soar-amid-the-censorship-campaign-of-appraisers/">Objectionable Valuations Become Hate Speech, Inflating Home Prices</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/home-prices-soar-amid-the-censorship-campaign-of-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">31274</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Bias Mantra is Largely False Reporting</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-bias-mantra-is-largely-false-reporting/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-bias-mantra-is-largely-false-reporting/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=30067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Just How Commonplace Is Appraisal Bias?&#160; Folks, about the only entity examining in depth the details behind all the allegations about appraisers being inherently biased is the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Housing Center. They are proving that most of the allegations are mostly a dump truck load of bovine substance. Click here for their latest expose. Report: Just How Commonplace Is Appraisal Bias? – theMReport.com Within this report are these statements from AEI: “When comparing appraisals for people of color to those for non-Hispanic white people within the same geographies, a new study by the American Enterprise Institute’s (AEI) Housing&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-bias-mantra-is-largely-false-reporting/">Appraisal Bias Mantra is Largely False Reporting</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-bias-mantra-is-largely-false-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30067</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woke &#8216;Bounty&#8217; Bill Will Chill Speech of New York Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/woke-bounty-bill-will-chill-speech-of-new-york-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/woke-bounty-bill-will-chill-speech-of-new-york-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bagott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of appraisal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A bill being crafted by the New York state Senate’s Finance Committee would, in effect, place a $2,000 bounty on the head of any heretical real estate appraiser in the Empire State who dares conclude a value that fails to satisfy a seller, serial refinancer or commissioned broker in a deal. Vulnerable buyers, who could be paying off inflated loans based on coerced values, would simply have to live with it. If enacted, the bill would authorize fines to be levied on appraisers for a new category of thoughtcrime – something called “appraisal discrimination.” Half the proceeds from the fines&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/woke-bounty-bill-will-chill-speech-of-new-york-appraisers">Woke &#8216;Bounty&#8217; Bill Will Chill Speech of New York Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/woke-bounty-bill-will-chill-speech-of-new-york-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Woke-Bounty-Bill-Will-Chill-Speech-of-New-York-Appraisers.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29427</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HUD&#8217;s Private Inquisitors Will Chill Protected Speech of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hud-hands-54-million-dollars-2-nonprofits-in-quest-2-cow-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/hud-hands-54-million-dollars-2-nonprofits-in-quest-2-cow-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bagott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The US Department of Housing and Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property Appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=29191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>HUD awarded $54 million to 182 nonprofits to serve as posses in a a Spanish Inquisition-style drive. The deep pockets of the federal government will be used to help the nonprofits chill the protected First Amendment rights of appraisers to develop disinterested opinions of value of the properties they appraise.&#160; In the early 1990s, the Texas Legislature established an unusual nonprofit known as the Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation. The times were dire. A near-biblical plague of weevils had descended on the state’s cotton crop. So, state lawmakers granted the private organization the powers of government to combat the malevolent creatures.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hud-hands-54-million-dollars-2-nonprofits-in-quest-2-cow-appraisers">HUD&#8217;s Private Inquisitors Will Chill Protected Speech of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/hud-hands-54-million-dollars-2-nonprofits-in-quest-2-cow-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HUD-Hands-54-Million-to-Nonprofits-in-Quest-to-Cow-Appraisers.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29191</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under-Valuations Unrelated to Racial Bias</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/under-valuations-unrelated-2-racial-bias</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/under-valuations-unrelated-2-racial-bias#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Finance Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Under-valuations that more accurately reflect the homes&#8217; “true” value as opposed to the contract price will also alert the buyer, not just the lender, that he or she may be over-paying, which often triggers a renegotiation&#8230; when the seller and buyer settle on a new price after the appraisal, the new lower price reduces credit risk, costs to the borrower, and ultimately results in greater wealth for the buyer. The AEI Housing Center recently released an analysis revealing that reports by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and by Brookings, attributing the greater prevalence of under-valuations in home purchase appraisals&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/under-valuations-unrelated-2-racial-bias">Under-Valuations Unrelated to Racial Bias</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/under-valuations-unrelated-2-racial-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Under-Valuations-Unrelated-to-Racial-Bias.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28743</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data and Verification Sources Are Critical</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/data-n-verification-sources-are-critical</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/data-n-verification-sources-are-critical#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The US Department of Veterans Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLS listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The genesis for this essay began when I heard from another appraiser that a VA report reviewer rejected the comparables “DOC Number” on the Verification Source(s) line. The reviewer said the “DOC Number” was not acceptable as a Verification Source. In fact, VA has said in a newsletter to appraisers that “&#8230; Assessor’s File Number may never be used as a Verification Source.” I disagree with that position, and this essay explains why. It also explains what appraisers should do to provide credible Data and Verification Source(s) in reports. Caveat: I don’t do VA assignments. I decided that a deeper dive&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/data-n-verification-sources-are-critical">Data and Verification Sources Are Critical</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/data-n-verification-sources-are-critical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23123</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Observation &#038; Trigger Points</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall & Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plat map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, this is another essay written about a report I have &#8216;observed.&#8217; I’ve mentioned before that I &#8220;come in contact with&#8221; appraisal reports from a variety of sources. Those that I determine have significant issues I write about. Conclusions about the &#8216;real value&#8217; will be disclosed below. Trigger points for having reports formally reviewed are discussed. I do this because a majority of appraisers do not participate and interact with their peers on a consistent basis, and therefore may not get exposed to items that clients and lenders see in reports, which they question. I believe it’s important to expose items in reports that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points">Report Observation &#038; Trigger Points</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20429</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye-bye 1004MC, Hello Analysis</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/goodbye-1004MC-hello-neighborhood-experts</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/goodbye-1004MC-hello-neighborhood-experts#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel Massey, SRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price-per-sqft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling guide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On July 31, 2018, at the Appraisal Institute Annual Conference, Fannie Mae announced the end of the 1004MC. News quickly spread among the appraisal blogosphere, and on August 7, 2018, the new Selling Guide showed that the 1004MC was no longer required. Rejoicing was heard throughout the land. Although the 1004MC is no longer required by Fannie Mae, the appraiser still needs to support their opinion of market trends, supply and demand, and marketing time. The exact verbiage found in the 8/7/18 updated Selling Guide is: The appraiser’s analysis of a property must take into consideration all factors that affect&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/goodbye-1004MC-hello-neighborhood-experts">Bye-bye 1004MC, Hello Analysis</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/goodbye-1004MC-hello-neighborhood-experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18947</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concession Reporting Confusion</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/lender-contributions-concession-reporting-confusion</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/lender-contributions-concession-reporting-confusion#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling guide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;how are these &#34;lender contributions&#34; identified&#8230; Appraisers are ‘required’ to report comparable sales or financing concessions that benefit a borrower in the GSE form appraisal report, on the second line in the comparison grid (as a negative adjustment). Secondly, for subject properties, appraisers are ‘required’ to report any concession benefiting the borrower on page 1 of the report form. Subject concession amount is NOT entered on the Comparable grid. Well now, FNMA has issued a modification to their Selling Guide (which takes effect as of 4/03/18) – SEL–2018-03 &#8211; (I have added type face enhancements): Lender Contributions With this update we are&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/lender-contributions-concession-reporting-confusion">Concession Reporting Confusion</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/lender-contributions-concession-reporting-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17660</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concession Adjustments Missing</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/concession-adjustments-missing-appraisal</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/concession-adjustments-missing-appraisal#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Concession Adjustments are expected to be made&#8230; Appraisers, As noted previously, I ‘observe’ various reports from various sources. A new one arrived last week. In looking over the grid, I noticed the concession adjustments are missing in the grid, as shown below. Commentary continues below the image. The appraiser correctly shows the concession amount in the left portion of the comp grid (Comp 1 &#38; 2 – Green Arrows), but does not put a corresponding adjustment for the concession in the actual grid column (Red arrows). This is NOT the first time I have seen this in reports. Apparently this&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/concession-adjustments-missing-appraisal">Concession Adjustments Missing</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/concession-adjustments-missing-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14619</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby or Bath Water? And Is it Time to Take Back USPAP?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declining market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Dodd Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Practices Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>About half of AICPA members don’t believe in USPAP&#8230; When I first heard that “they” were trying to do away with the Appraisal Practices Board (APB) of the Appraisal Foundation (TAF), I tried to keep an open mind. I also wondered who “they” are. Did the Appraisal Institute (AI) finally get a sympathetic ear in Congress? Was it preemptive action by the Board of Trustees in anticipation of budget cuts by the new administration? By the way, what does the APB do? I certainly had it wrong. I thought they helped develop the Advisory Opinions (AOs)! To be candid the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/">Baby or Bath Water? And Is it Time to Take Back USPAP?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13278</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observations of a Review Appraiser</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/adjustments-review-appraiser</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/adjustments-review-appraiser#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian L. Trotrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time adjustment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Adjustments appeared to come from some List or Automated&#8230; Recently I had the opportunity to work on a Class Action case. The case settled, and there are confidentiality agreements for both sides, so I cannot reveal any details. I will summarize the allegations and findings, as well as the scope of work performed. I should say also that before being hired, I was interviewed, and vetted. Every reference provided, was contacted, as well as a records check and background check. What they were looking for was a combination of a clean reputation for being unbiased, as well as depth of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/adjustments-review-appraiser">Observations of a Review Appraiser</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/adjustments-review-appraiser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11848</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers &#8211; The Reason You Have No Business: Functional Obsolescence</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-the-reason-you-have-no-business-functional-obsolescence/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-the-reason-you-have-no-business-functional-obsolescence/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Hagar, SRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional obsolescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Functional obsolescence is the reason many appraisers are going out of business. On a daily basis, appraisers moan: &#8220;It’s because of the HVCC that my business is down&#8221; or &#8220;that AMC or X or Y or Z caused my income to decline.&#8221; Really? Are you sure? So, why is my company buried in business and you’re not? We’ve all heard about blacksmiths being out of work; Seems the use of horses has declined. And the need for typewriter repairmen, the demand just isn’t what it was 20 years ago. The people in these jobs failed to adapt; Maybe appraiser are having the same problem.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-the-reason-you-have-no-business-functional-obsolescence/">Appraisers &#8211; The Reason You Have No Business: Functional Obsolescence</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisers-the-reason-you-have-no-business-functional-obsolescence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7879</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract Analysis Paralysis</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/analysis-paralysis/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/analysis-paralysis/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The most critical failure found in appraisal reports that come before the Board, whether residential, commercial, or agricultural, is a lack of analysis.  Appraisers seem to think that citing or reporting is synonymous with analysis. Analysis &#8211; to study (something) closely and carefully: to learn the nature and relationship of the parts of (something) by a close and careful examination. The URAR asks: I did or did not analyze the contract for sale for the subject purchase transaction. Explain the results of the analysis of the contract for sale or why the analysis was not performed. Yet many will write:&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/analysis-paralysis/">Contract Analysis Paralysis</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/analysis-paralysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5839</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Financing Concessions for Comparables</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/update-on-financing-concessions-for-comparables/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/update-on-financing-concessions-for-comparables/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, The GSE’s have issued a UAD newsletter on Sept. 18, 2012. Mostly it has ‘stuff’ in it that appraisers should be doing, i.e., checking for proper UAD compliance prior to report submittal by using your report software on-board reviewer. However, this little gem is the last item on page 2: Update on Financing Concessions for Comparables The GSEs expect appraisers to determine the financing concessions, if any, for all settled sales used as comparables in appraisal reports. Appraisers are expected to do what is necessary to determine concession amounts through the normal course of business and not automatically default&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/update-on-financing-concessions-for-comparables/">Update on Financing Concessions for Comparables</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/update-on-financing-concessions-for-comparables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3431</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concessions &#8211; When &#038; How Much to Adjust</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/concessions/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/concessions/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a lack of consensus or understanding among appraisers regarding concessions paid to a buyer in a sales transaction. The focus here is on appraisals communicated via a current Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac form. The intent of this article is to bring some clarity to this topic, whether you’re appraising the property as a purchase transaction or using it as a comparable sale after it has closed. First, in your appraisal due to purchase, a concession to the buyer of the subject of your appraisal must be reported in the contract section of the appraisal report. However, you must remember&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/concessions/">Concessions &#8211; When &#038; How Much to Adjust</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/concessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2404</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
