<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>assignment results - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/assignment-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/assignment-results/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed update of professional guidelines for property appraisals contains confusing language about what constitutes discrimination, and would even suggest appraisers could engage in “ethical” discrimination.&#160; Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators. I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition">Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Confusing-Language-for-USPAP-Ethics-Rule-Addition.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Offenders &#038; Appraised Value</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/how-does-sex-offenders-presence-affect-appraised-value</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/how-does-sex-offenders-presence-affect-appraised-value#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“You know there is a half-way house for sex offenders in the neighborhood, don’t you? It’s about two blocks away from the subject”.. OK. You’re well and truly involved with your research on a job that’s already late. You think you’ve got all your due diligence-bases covered. But you call the broker to confirm on last detail and she asks you, “You know there is a half-way house for sex offenders in the neighborhood, don’t you? It’s about two blocks away from the subject”. Needless to say, you are taken aback! No, you had no clue there was such a facility two blocks away from&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/how-does-sex-offenders-presence-affect-appraised-value">Sex Offenders &#038; Appraised Value</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/how-does-sex-offenders-presence-affect-appraised-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24616</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Reports Intellectual Property?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-considered-intellectual-property</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-considered-intellectual-property#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently one of my Mastermind students asked about Intellectual Property. He told me that he’d had an associate leave his firm to go solo. Later, he was reading one of his former-associate’s reports and found the now-independent associate’s reports looked a lot like his in format, and even language. My student asked me if this was wrong. Well, I’m not a lawyer, but there are some sound issues to consider here. If you write something, if you are its author, it is your intellectual property. You can either trademark it (like a logo), or copyright it (like a novel). We&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-considered-intellectual-property">Are Reports Intellectual Property?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-considered-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22965</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computershare Reviews &#038; Cheap Diapers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computershare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The resulting &#8220;outcome&#8221; of those cheap diapers is the same outcome as Computershare 15-minute reviews must be&#8230; This didn’t start out as an article, but you know me. Doing research prior to posting in the 100% comments board I was shocked at how pervasive this new &#8216;service&#8217; already is. A simple blog post can’t begin to cover it. Every single reader needs to research their own states requirements. The AMC at the following link makes this easy. Please look your state up. My concern was with Computershare and Colorado. Feel free to look them up by clicking here. If that doesn’t&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers">Computershare Reviews &#038; Cheap Diapers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/computershare-15-minutes-appraisal-reviews-n-cheap-diapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22648</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 Minutes?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>$15 USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 minutes? A VaCAP member shared with us something they read in an appraiser group on Facebook last week and expressed concern. We agree there is a reason to be concerned and want to alert our members to be cautious. We do not know if the source of this request is an amc or a lender, but either way, there is reason for concern. Here is what was shared: “I have been diligently looking for appraisers to complete to do our NEW USPAP reviews. These pay $15 per report and are completed in 10-15 minutes.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes">USPAP Appraisal Reviews in 15 Minutes?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fifteen-dollar-uspap-appraisal-reviews-in-15-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22638</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hybrids vs USPAP Scope of Work Rule</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-appraisal-vs-uspap-scope-of-work-rule-sow</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-appraisal-vs-uspap-scope-of-work-rule-sow#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Independence Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supporters of the bifurcated appraisal can claim scope of work till they are blue in the face&#8230; Appraisal Buzz published an article written by Joshua Walit on July 31, 2019 titled Nothing New Under the Sun: The Varied Face of Appraisal. The article brings up some good points, however; it does not take into account the reality of the market and the control of the lenders and appraisal management companies in the process. The mere fact that the appraiser does not have control over the person completing the inspection and in most cases, no way to even know who is providing the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-appraisal-vs-uspap-scope-of-work-rule-sow">Hybrids vs USPAP Scope of Work Rule</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/bifurcated-appraisal-vs-uspap-scope-of-work-rule-sow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="http://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CREAB-Complaints-and-License-Matters-2019.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22485</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Race Baked into Big Data?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declining market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair housing act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Chicago appraiser and friend (even though she calls me “fancy pants”) writes a stellar explanation of what an appraiser actual does – and what one of the panel experts got completely wrong because he didn’t understand our role in the mortgage process: Greetings Congresswoman Waters, Chairman Clay, Ranking Member Duffy, Ranking Member Gooden, and the Members of the Housing Subcommittee: My name is Maureen Sweeney, and I am a real estate appraiser. I grew up in a real estate family and lived through the savings and loan crisis of the 1980’s, which had a profound impact on my life. I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data">Is Race Baked into Big Data?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/race-baked-into-unregulated-big-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22268</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square feet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How can using such a contractor not be a violation? In the context of a real estate appraisal, especially a residential real estate appraisal for a lender thru an AMC, what is confidential? First, look at USPAP’s definition of confidential information (lines 105 – 108 in the 2018-2019 edition). It says “confidential information [is] information that is either&#8230;identified by the client as confidential when providing it to an appraiser and that is not available from any other source; or&#8230;classified as confidential or private by applicable law or regulation” (ibid; emphasis added). Notice confidentiality flows to the client, not to any&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service">USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20694</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paint a Picture with Words</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/reconciliation-tying-analysis-n-thought-process</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/reconciliation-tying-analysis-n-thought-process#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel Massey, SRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value range]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The reconciliation is precisely the place we want to avoid any boilerplate&#8230; A common complaint among couples is a lack of communication. “He should have known I wanted that bracelet for my birthday” “She should have known I wanted to have sushi for dinner” “She should be more considerate of my feelings”, etc. How are we supposed to know these things? Are we mind-readers? It would be much easier if we would somehow communicate our wishes with our partners, without having to come right out and say something, but at the same time, it takes away from the spontaneity of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/reconciliation-tying-analysis-n-thought-process">Paint a Picture with Words</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/reconciliation-tying-analysis-n-thought-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18350</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraiser Versus Machine?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/higher-value-bids-appraiser-vs-machine</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/higher-value-bids-appraiser-vs-machine#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Loan officer, the bank, homeowner&#8230; want a higher value&#8230; Automated Valuation Models: Are they any good? Appraiser vs Machine? AVMs were run on a few properties that were recently appraised. The results are well, &#8230;.. they are what they are. The questions are: Are they good? Are they good enough? Will the consumer accept them? Will the banks and lenders accept them? Below are the samples. We have to be careful as we are appraisers and don&#8217;t want to be sitting in front of the VREAB explaining why we shared assignment results in violation of the confidentiality requirements of the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/higher-value-bids-appraiser-vs-machine">Appraiser Versus Machine?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/higher-value-bids-appraiser-vs-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12980</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Requests from Lenders with Specific Statements</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-requesting-statements-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-requesting-statements-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crawl space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lenders&#8217; Requests, C&#038;R Fees, Email Blasts, SOW, Unlicensed AMCs and more&#8230; What is the best way to ensure you receive a customary and reasonable fee for an appraisal? Answer: Only accept assignments with a customary and reasonable fee! That being said, here is a reminder of a USPAP requirement to consider before you respond to that email or text blast&#8230;. Scope of Work Rule Identify the problem to be solved. Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible assignment results. Disclose the scope of work in the report. Comment: Scope of work includes, but is not limited&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-requesting-statements-appraisals">Requests from Lenders with Specific Statements</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-requesting-statements-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11893</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Do a Particular Assignment per USPAP??</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Market Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I can Accept That Assignment! Types of assignments&#8230; Folks, The Appraisal Foundation, via John Brenan, has released the following, showing which portions of USPAP apply to particular assignments. This involves the applicable Standards and Rules. You may want to print the PDF posted below and keep it under your pillow, or at least with your copy of USPAP! Yes, I can Accept That Assignment! USPAP Flexibility at a Glance Some appraisers may not be aware of the inherent flexibility built into the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). Because USPAP is a set of standards that is built&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments">Can You Do a Particular Assignment per USPAP??</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11788</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Realities of Regression</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The use of Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU) tool by lenders has created some “hot topics” for appraisers. Durbin is encouraged by the use of CU and thinks it will be a good thing for the appraisal profession. One of these topics is the discussion around how to clearly show the methodology the appraiser used to arrive at the adjustment values. In this presentation Durbin proposes the use of “Regression Analysis” (RA) as a solution to this problem.<br />
Durbin lamented there is a perception that appraisers make subjective, anecdotal, arbitrary, and unscientific adjustments. Now that CU will be looking at adjustments...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/">The Realities of Regression</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8688</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpermitted Additions &#8220;Zombie&#8221; Assignment Condition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/unpermitted-additions-zombie-assignment-condition/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/unpermitted-additions-zombie-assignment-condition/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpermitted additions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Unpermitted Additions This is a “zombie” assignment condition that seems to never die. Let’s agree that unpermitted means something was constructed without a required written permit. There are plenty of jurisdictions that don’t issue permits because the permit process doesn’t exist. The assignment condition goes something like this: The appraiser is not to include any GLA from any unpermitted additions unless they use comparables that have similar unpermitted additions. Here’s what Fannie Mae stated in their September 2014 FAQs: If the subject property features an unpermitted addition, can the square footage of the unpermitted addition be included in the total gross living area reported on the appraisal report? If the appraiser has identified an addition(s) that does&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/unpermitted-additions-zombie-assignment-condition/">Unpermitted Additions &#8220;Zombie&#8221; Assignment Condition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/unpermitted-additions-zombie-assignment-condition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7751</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going the Distance in USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/going-the-distance-in-uspap/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/going-the-distance-in-uspap/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographic competency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Arbitrary distance limitations&#8230;. When I was in private practice, much of my litigation work took me to Somonauck, Sandwich and Plano, Illinois. That’s about 45 miles west of where I live. Still, I had so much work in those areas, you’d think I had an office there. However, if I were working for many AMCs, I’d have been considered too far out of my area for the assignment. Some AMCs, under the guise of authenticating geo-competency, restrict assignments to Illinois certified appraisers based upon arbitrary distance limitations. Most typically seen are 15 miles for urban/suburban locations and 25 miles for&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/going-the-distance-in-uspap/">Going the Distance in USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/going-the-distance-in-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7595</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP Updates &#038; Revisions Appraisers, On Feb 6, the Appraisal Standards Board finalized the upcoming changes to the next issue of USPAP. See the PDF for the actual document. The highlights are: Revisions adopted for 2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP The following changes were adopted by the Board in a public meeting on February 6, 2015, and will be incorporated in the 2016 &#8211; 17 edition of USPAP and associated guidance material with an effective date of January 1, 2016: Revisions to the RECORD KEEPING RULE Revisions to STANDARD 3 Revisions to the Definition of Assignment Results and Confidential Information and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/">USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7011</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adjustments &#8211; Your Opinion Doesn’t Count</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Hagar, SRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulations state that appraisal adjustments cannot be based upon an appraiser’s opinion. According to federal and state law, adjustments must be based on support and evidence- proof if you will, and an appraiser’s opinion is not considered to be &#8220;support.&#8221; Many appraisers have failed to support their adjustments and as a result have had their licenses revoked, penalties assessed and lawsuits lost, all because the they failed to understand a single but important requirement. Think about your appraisals. Are the adjustments based on your opinion or do you have proof of the adjustment in your workfile? Then one day I&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/">Adjustments &#8211; Your Opinion Doesn’t Count</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/adjustments-your-opinion-doesnt-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6618</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>USPAP Violations&#8230; This is a list of USPAP violations most commonly encountered by the Texas Appraiser Licensing &#38; Certification Board&#8217;s staff appraiser-investigators when investigating complaints filed with the Board. This list of violations is given for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or instructions on how to properly comply with USPAP or properly complete an appraisal assignment. Most Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations: Sales Comparison Selection of Comparable Properties. Failing to select and/or support the selection of comparable sales using recognized methods and techniques. Examples include: Leaving the subject’s neighborhood when sales data is readily available in the immediate neighborhood; Searching by&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/">Commonly Encountered USPAP Violations</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/commonly-encountered-uspap-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6401</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharing Report with Fellow Appraisers a USPAP Violation?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Sharing a Report with a Fellow Appraiser a Violation of USPAP Confidentiality?&#8230;Appraisers routinely share confidential information &#38; communicate assignment results with other appraisers&#8230; Appraisers frequently are faced with chances to make mistakes related to confidentiality. The Confidentiality Section of the ETHICS RULE of Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), as published by the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) of the Appraisal Foundation and enforced by the North Carolina Appraisal Board, provides the rules for appraisers in North Carolina. Appraisers often are reminded about and advised how to avoid the pitfalls of communicating with property owners, real estate brokers, lenders&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/">Sharing Report with Fellow Appraisers a USPAP Violation?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6075</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2014-15 USPAP Modifications Released</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2014-15 modifications to USPAP become effective 1/1/2014 In preparation of the new 2014-15 modifications to USPAP effective January 1, ASA’s Ethic’s Committee has prepared a brief summary outlining the modifications. The Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) 2014-15 modifications to USPAP become effective January 1, 2014. These modifications include: Revisions to the DEFINITIONS of “Assignment Results” and “Scope of Work” — Based on comments received, there was a need to clarify the definition of ‘Assignment Results.’ In an appraisal assignment, assignment results currently include more than just the appraiser&#8217;s opinion of value, as the appraiser is responsible not only for the opinion&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/">2014-15 USPAP Modifications Released</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5465</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
