<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ASB - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/asb-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/asb-2/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:10:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed update of professional guidelines for property appraisals contains confusing language about what constitutes discrimination, and would even suggest appraisers could engage in “ethical” discrimination.&#160; Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators. I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition">Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Confusing-Language-for-USPAP-Ethics-Rule-Addition.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, should we include discussion of B&#38;D in our reports? Wait, What?? Bondage and Discipline? No, not that. Bias and Discrimination. Yes, it must be addressed very clearly. Now, before you blow a cork or throw your mouse at the computer screen, let’s examine what’s really been impacting ‘us’ for the past 4 plus years. One of our peers, who’s become somewhat famous for the way articles are written about appraisal and other topics, had a recent article ‘rebroadcasted’ in AppraisersBlogs, FTX Bought Government&#8217;s Silence; Did Fintechs Buy Attacks on Appraisers? A statement in that article exposes some of what has&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports">Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28183</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Third Exposure Draft</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks, the Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board released the THIRD Exposure Draft to USPAP on July 26, 2022. To be honest, I didn’t know there have been two previous Exposure Drafts. I would encourage you to download and print this Draft here. The PDF is also embedded below. It’s only 11 pages total. The key difference in this Draft is that the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. You&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27505</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Removing the Definition of Personal Inspection</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why is the ASB proposing to remove the definition of Personal Inspection? Several days ago, an appraiser posted the following comment which we have decided to publish as a free-standing post because we believe it deserves attention: Amazingly, while these are horrible – everyone seems to miss the real issue that will hit us all in 2023. As of 2023, if the ASB gets its way in a few weeks, the word “inspection” or “personal inspection” will no longer be defined in USPAP. That means they don’t even have to play this game. “Desktop” appraisal is just a stopgap until&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection">Removing the Definition of Personal Inspection</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26312</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, if your license renews in 2022, you will need to take the ‘new’ USPAP 7hr Update course. See below. The Update class you have already taken for the 2020-21 book, which has been extended to Dec. 31, 2022, cannot be used for CE credit again. However, I’m somewhat confused as to the effective dates of this ‘new’ Update class. It says “2022-23” which implies it will be valid through the end of (or into?) 2023. But the ‘current’ USPAP is presently undergoing Exposure Drafts for the proposed changes, which will be effective as of Jan. 1, 2023.  Normally, the Update&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course">2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP 2020-2021 Extension</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2020-21 USPAP Extension &#8211; Does this mean USPAP will be on a three-year cycle going forward? USPAP has been extended for one year, effective through December, 31, 2022. This is the Appraisal Foundation news release, issued on Feb. 19, 2021: Media Contact: Amy Timmerman (202) 624-3048 amy@appraisalfoundation.org BREAKING: 2020-21 USPAP Extended for One Year (Washington, DC) February 19, 2021 – The Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) announced today that the current edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) will be extended by one year. The 2020-2021 USPAP will now be effective until December 31, 2022. “USPAP&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022">USPAP 2020-2021 Extension</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24973</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board have released the 4th Exposure Draft to the FUTURE version (2022-23) of USPAP. I, like so many other ‘stakeholders’ and appraisers, have grown weary of the incessant Exposure Drafts and updates to our mandated PROTOCOL MANUAL, which for many years has been massaged and modified in various ways every 2 years. Largely because new members cycle onto the ASB every year or two. The constant updates has resulted into a continuing cash cow for the Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board. But in actual use, that should not happen because USPAP is codified&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes">Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercutting the Appraisal Profession</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AAREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Association of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposed Revision to STANDARDS RULE 2-2&#8230;a change that would undercut the appraisal profession in a major way&#8230; Comments on the proposed changes to the 2022-23 USPAP are needed. The proposed changes to the reporting requirement of Standard 2 may impact the profession negatively and confuse the public on who we are and what we do. We ask that each and every one of you pause for a moment and comment by July 30th. Below is what was sent out to the Arizona Association of Real Estate Appraisers by Joanna Conde. Virginia also requires anyone using the title appraiser, be licensed.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession">Undercutting the Appraisal Profession</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24196</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Evaluations: Concept Paper, Webinar, Public Meeting In early August, The Appraisal Foundation announced that the The Appraisal Standards Board would be considering adopting standards for evaluations in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). On September 3, 2019, they announced three opportunities to learn more and share your insights. Concept Paper The Appraisal Standards Board is seeking your feedback on the concept of developing standards for performing evaluations in USPAP. Submit your comments to ASBcomments@appraisalfoundation.org. The comment period closes on October 11, 2019. Read the evaluations concept paper here Webinar Wayne Miller, chair of the Appraisal Standards Board, and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella">Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="http://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NPR-appraisal-threshold.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22659</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gladiator Appraiser, Pat Turner</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of appraisal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulatory reform is needed in the appraisal profession and Pat Turner is the right appraiser to help move it forward! This is a CALL TO ACTION. Please listen to Phil Crawford&#8217;s Voice of Appraisal Show released yesterday morning. He has put out a call to action to every appraiser to write a letter of recommendation for VaCAP President Pat Turner to be appointed to the Appraisal Standards Board: Time to stand up again! Pat Turner, &#8220;The Gladiator Appraiser&#8221;, from the Great Commonwealth of Virginia has applied for a position on the Appraisal Standards Board at The Appraisal Foundation! Now more&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board">The Gladiator Appraiser, Pat Turner</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22557</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, don’t toss your reading bifocals in the wastebasket just yet. Apparently, there were so many negative issues with the THIRD exposure draft to the 2020-21 version of USPAP, that the ASB jettisoned it, and will move forward with a FOURTH draft. Everyone should be on their toes, ready to peruse this stellar document when it is released not long from now! Can’t we, please, establish a set of reliable and understandable procedures, and leave them in place for 5 years minimum? Please! Here’s the announcement issued on February 8, 2019, after the ASB meeting in Scottsdale, AZ: (From the Appraisal Foundation)&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft">Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20938</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Algorithms are everywhere&#8230; “Algorithms decide who gets a loan, who gets a job interview, who gets insurance and much more — but they don’t automatically make things fair. Mathematician and data scientist Cathy O’Neil coined a term for algorithms that are secret, important and harmful: “weapons of math destruction.” Learn more about the hidden agendas behind the formulas.” &#8220;Algorithms are opinions embedded in code. It&#8217;s really different from what you think most people think of algorithms. They think algorithms are objective and true and scientific. That&#8217;s a marketing trick. It&#8217;s also a marketing trick to intimidate you with algorithms, to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction">What If the Algorithms Are Wrong?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/wrong-algorithms-math-destruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20836</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The current and proposed revised version of USPAP also opens the door to increased regulatory persecution of licensed and certified real estate appraisers, while leaving all others that opine about values with no constraints, rules or limitations. I was recently asked to consider a proposed change to USPAP. As received in my email: “Also this, in the 3rd exposure draft 239 The appraiser is not required to title an appraisal report using specific terminology because 240 USPAP compliance is measured by the substantive content of a report, not by what the 241 report is called. The use of labels such as analysis,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers">Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20713</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square feet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square footage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workfile]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How can using such a contractor not be a violation? In the context of a real estate appraisal, especially a residential real estate appraisal for a lender thru an AMC, what is confidential? First, look at USPAP’s definition of confidential information (lines 105 – 108 in the 2018-2019 edition). It says “confidential information [is] information that is either&#8230;identified by the client as confidential when providing it to an appraiser and that is not available from any other source; or&#8230;classified as confidential or private by applicable law or regulation” (ibid; emphasis added). Notice confidentiality flows to the client, not to any&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service">USPAP &#038; Questions on Confidentiality</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-confidentiality-contractor-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20694</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is&#8230; Folks, the Second Exposure Draft of proposed changes to the next USPAP was released by the Appraisal Standards Board on August 23. See embedded PDF below. The ASB is encouraging all users to review this document, and provide commentary back to them on/before October 10, 2018. One item of note is there is a proposal in the Draft to do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is. If it’s not an ‘appraisal’, what is it?? Currently we have “Appraisal Report”&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft">If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At or During?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“At the time of assignment” refers to the time period commencing&#8230; Last month, the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) provided the ‘first draft’ of the proposed changes to the 2020-21 USPAP, which I circulated. One of the points they mentioned is a goal to make USPAP easier to read and more understandable. OK, commendable. Then on June 27, 2018, the Appraisal Foundation and the ASB released the latest USPAP Q&#38;A “suggestions.” (The USPAP Q&#38;A&#8217;s, AO&#8217;s, and FAQ&#8217;s are not directives, or even a ‘legal’ part of USPAP. Instead, they offer independent commentary on how a particular issue could be handled or solved, but may&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period">At or During?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18572</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately there has been a push for bifurcated (hybrid) appraisal products. Those promoting these questionable products claim it will reduce the amount of time to obtain an appraisal. Most appraisers are screaming foul play, and for good reason. It is because of bad players doing questionable things that licensing became mandatory in Virginia. Mandatory. Licensing of appraisers protects the public trust. We all know splitting the process will not save time, but rather create delays. The only reason for this questionable product is the profit of the amc, nothing more. And then there is the quality of the information being&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals">Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18387</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers get frustrated with the constant changes and revisions every two years&#8230; Folks, attached is the 1st Exposure Draft of changes to the NEXT “bible” of our industry. Read this over and then send in your comments per the instructions. With this draft, the ASB is desiring to simplify much of the document to make it easier to read and understand. There are numerous proposed edits you’ll see when you read it. They explain their rationale for the changes. This is appreciated. I’m also glad to see they have added to the Definitions the words “State” and “Summarize” which have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years">Ain’t No Way to Run a Railroad</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-revisions-every-two-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18273</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credible Third Party Inspections</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/credible-third-party-inspections-ea</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/credible-third-party-inspections-ea#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;producing credible real estate appraisal reports&#8230; Is it any wonder that The Appraisal Foundation has lost nearly all credibility as America’s self-proclaimed foremost authority on appraisal matters? I humbly submit their most recent offering. Excerpt from current ASB Q&#38;A: “2018-19 USPAP Q&#38;A Issue Date: March 29, 2018 The Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) of The Appraisal Foundation develops, interprets, and amends the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) on behalf of appraisers and users of appraisal services. The USPAP Q&#38;A is a form of guidance issued by the ASB to respond to questions raised by appraisers, enforcement officials, users of appraisal&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/credible-third-party-inspections-ea">Credible Third Party Inspections</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/credible-third-party-inspections-ea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17588</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Send it to India &#038; Save Billions!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/outsourcing-real-estate-services-2-India</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/outsourcing-real-estate-services-2-India#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16920</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisal? Obviously its only worth ten bucks &#8211; off to India with it&#8230; Most appraisers (and consumers) know the difference between &#8216;right and wrong&#8217;. We don&#8217;t need the tortuous, twisted ambiguities of ASB straddling the fence, on all issues to know what is and is not okay. So far ALL they do is hypothesize that bad products can theoretically be used, IF they conform to all the USPAP rules that we all already know they fall short of. As in every single exception being sought for regulatory exceptions in the financial sector, only impractical, not very probable, best case scenarios&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/outsourcing-real-estate-services-2-India">Send it to India &#038; Save Billions!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/outsourcing-real-estate-services-2-India/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16920</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
