<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advisory Opinion - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/advisory-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/advisory-opinion/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 04:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Is the GSE&#8217;s &#8220;Appraisal Modernization&#8221; Really Just Mass Appraisal?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-the-gses-appraisal-modernization-really-just-mass-appraisal/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-the-gses-appraisal-modernization-really-just-mass-appraisal/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dallas T. Kiedrowski, MNAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data collector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=30451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mass Appraisal tend to exhibit a regressive nature&#8230;&#160; In the intricate landscape of real estate mortgage financing, the notion of appraisal waivers recently dubbed “Value Acceptance”, by the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), has stirred considerable debate. The most recent statistics show Value Acceptance accounts for up to 40% of all mortgage approvals. It is presented as part of the GSEs “Appraisal Modernization” initiative, which aims to streamline the mortgage appraisal process. However, a closer examination reveals potential drawbacks, raising questions about its efficacy and impact on the housing market. Despite its roots in a methodology designed to support appraisers, Value&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/is-the-gses-appraisal-modernization-really-just-mass-appraisal/">Is the GSE&#8217;s &#8220;Appraisal Modernization&#8221; Really Just Mass Appraisal?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-the-gses-appraisal-modernization-really-just-mass-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">30451</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Liable for Third Parties Data</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-ultimately-liable-4-data-collected-by-third-parties</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-ultimately-liable-4-data-collected-by-third-parties#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Commission of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately the appraiser is responsible and liable for data collected by third parties. There has been a lot of discussion and debate among appraisers around liability issues for data collected by third parties for hybrid and desktop appraisals. On April 22, 2022, the Maryland Commission of Real Estate Appraisers cautioned its appraisers that they are responsible for the data they rely upon. Hello Maryland Appraiser: It has come to the attention of the Maryland Commission of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraisal Management Companies, and Home Inspectors (&#8220;Commission&#8221;) that there may be confusion over where a supervising appraiser and trainee are supposed&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-ultimately-liable-4-data-collected-by-third-parties">Appraisers Liable for Third Parties Data</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-ultimately-liable-4-data-collected-by-third-parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26735</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation has issued an exposure draft for Advisory Opinion (AO) 16. Advisory Opinion 16 is Fair Housing Laws: Avoiding Bias in Real Property Appraisal and Appraisal Review Development and Reporting. Unlike other exposure drafts, the text of the AO opinion has been rewritten. The traditional strike through of word or phrase changes is nonexistent. The Appraisal Foundation acknowledges “the Advisory Opinion was extensively rewritten”. Comments on the changes are due to The Appraisal Foundation by March 31, 2021 via SurveyMonkey or email, asb@appraisalfoundation.org. Although an Advisory Opinion is not a standard of practice, it does express what is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers">Advisory Opinion 16, a Game Changer?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/advisory-opinion-16-could-b-a-game-changer-4-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25012</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Mueller Report has surfaced. The report is a Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report and it was given to an appraiser as a sample. This one raises more questions than the last one! The photos from the property inspection do not tell the appraiser one thing. The photos are dark and the repairs the inspector states are needed, simply are not seen in the photos. It begs the question, does the appraiser have adequate information to complete a credible appraisal? Now take a look at the Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal report. Pull up the report and follow along. Some things have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP">Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21229</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improper Direction to Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/improper-direction-2-appraisers-AGA-letter</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/improper-direction-2-appraisers-AGA-letter#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 12:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreLogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;specific prohibited direction to appraisers involved in federally regulated transactions&#8230; Improper direction to appraisers as a new special lender condition Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen: The following article appeared in a recent online post at https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-asked-2-overlook-weed-cultivation (also copied to this letter following our inquiry). We consider the original author to be a credible source. Due to the serious implications of any appraisal management service giving such specific prohibited direction to appraisers involved in federally regulated transactions we believe it to be our duty to bring this to your collective attention. We respectfully request that each Federal Regulatory Agency review this issue&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/improper-direction-2-appraisers-AGA-letter">Improper Direction to Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/improper-direction-2-appraisers-AGA-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18054</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby or Bath Water? And Is it Time to Take Back USPAP?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declining market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Dodd Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Comparison Approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Practices Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>About half of AICPA members don’t believe in USPAP&#8230; When I first heard that “they” were trying to do away with the Appraisal Practices Board (APB) of the Appraisal Foundation (TAF), I tried to keep an open mind. I also wondered who “they” are. Did the Appraisal Institute (AI) finally get a sympathetic ear in Congress? Was it preemptive action by the Board of Trustees in anticipation of budget cuts by the new administration? By the way, what does the APB do? I certainly had it wrong. I thought they helped develop the Advisory Opinions (AOs)! To be candid the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/">Baby or Bath Water? And Is it Time to Take Back USPAP?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/time-2-reclaim-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13278</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Time to STOP the Foolishness</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/stop-constant-uspap-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/stop-constant-uspap-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=12456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>STOP the constant parsing changes in all areas of USPAP I encourage ALL appraisers in the DC Metro area to attend the upcoming ASB Public Meeting on October 21, 2016. In a nut shell, my strong belief is that they need to STOP the constant parsing changes in all areas of USPAP. NOT ONE of the proposed changes is a necessary change. NOT ONE! No wonder state regulators no longer comprehend USPAP! If they need the extra money that selling new versions of USPAP produces, then just CHARGE US DIRECTLY! The purpose of FIRREA was to preserve the public’s trust&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/stop-constant-uspap-changes">It’s Time to STOP the Foolishness</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/stop-constant-uspap-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12456</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Do a Particular Assignment per USPAP??</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Market Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=11788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I can Accept That Assignment! Types of assignments&#8230; Folks, The Appraisal Foundation, via John Brenan, has released the following, showing which portions of USPAP apply to particular assignments. This involves the applicable Standards and Rules. You may want to print the PDF posted below and keep it under your pillow, or at least with your copy of USPAP! Yes, I can Accept That Assignment! USPAP Flexibility at a Glance Some appraisers may not be aware of the inherent flexibility built into the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). Because USPAP is a set of standards that is built&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments">Can You Do a Particular Assignment per USPAP??</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-permitted-assignments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11788</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Standards Should Age Like Fine Wine</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-standards-should-age-like-fine-wine</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-standards-should-age-like-fine-wine#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles (Don) Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Changes in Appraisal Standards? We have barely got into the &#8220;New&#8221; 2016-2017 copy of USPAP and the ASB is meeting on February 19, 2016 to discuss making changes to the 2018-2019 edition of USPAP. Here is part of what I have written to the ASB. I believe it should be the duty of every appraiser to write to the Foundation and any board that is contemplating making changes. You have that right, and they will read your comments. Letter to ASB: I have been a real estate appraiser since the mid 1980&#8217;s and prior to mandatory licensure. I have been&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-standards-should-age-like-fine-wine">Appraisal Standards Should Age Like Fine Wine</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-standards-should-age-like-fine-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9943</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Realities of Regression</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppraisalPort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The use of Fannie Mae’s Collateral Underwriter (CU) tool by lenders has created some “hot topics” for appraisers. Durbin is encouraged by the use of CU and thinks it will be a good thing for the appraisal profession. One of these topics is the discussion around how to clearly show the methodology the appraiser used to arrive at the adjustment values. In this presentation Durbin proposes the use of “Regression Analysis” (RA) as a solution to this problem.<br />
Durbin lamented there is a perception that appraisers make subjective, anecdotal, arbitrary, and unscientific adjustments. Now that CU will be looking at adjustments...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/">The Realities of Regression</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-realities-of-regression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8688</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP Updates &#038; Revisions Appraisers, On Feb 6, the Appraisal Standards Board finalized the upcoming changes to the next issue of USPAP. See the PDF for the actual document. The highlights are: Revisions adopted for 2016 &#8211; 17 USPAP The following changes were adopted by the Board in a public meeting on February 6, 2015, and will be incorporated in the 2016 &#8211; 17 edition of USPAP and associated guidance material with an effective date of January 1, 2016: Revisions to the RECORD KEEPING RULE Revisions to STANDARD 3 Revisions to the Definition of Assignment Results and Confidential Information and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/">USPAP 2016-17 Summary of Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/uspap-2016-17-summary-of-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7011</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is an Appraiser Not an Appraiser?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/when-is-an-appraiser-not-an-appraiser/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/when-is-an-appraiser-not-an-appraiser/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuation Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With an influx of alternative valuation products now being offered to appraisers, I am often asked which of these assignments can be done by appraisers and which should be avoided. I am not a USPAP instructor, a lawyer, or a specialist in your individual state’s law, but I will give you the answer as I understand it (I am not responsible for your individual compliance to USPAP, the law, and blah blah blah). First, an analogy is in order. Imagine you are a spectator at a sporting event. Sitting next to you is your buddy who asks you about a certain call the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/when-is-an-appraiser-not-an-appraiser/">When is an Appraiser Not an Appraiser?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/when-is-an-appraiser-not-an-appraiser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6248</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland Removes References to USPAP Advisory Opinions</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/maryland-removes-references-to-uspap-advisory-opinions/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/maryland-removes-references-to-uspap-advisory-opinions/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Commission of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, AI requested the removal of the references to the AOs and FAQs from the Commission’s regulations&#8230;. On April 8, the Maryland Commission of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraisal Management Companies and Home Inspectors completed action on rulemaking that removed the Advisory Opinions and Frequently Asked Questions of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice from being incorporated by reference into the state’s appraiser licensing and certification laws. The move addresses the Appraisal Institute’s long-standing concerns about increased regulatory burdens placed on professional appraisers. Prior to this rule change, the AOs and FAQs were considered by the Commission to be&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/maryland-removes-references-to-uspap-advisory-opinions/">Maryland Removes References to USPAP Advisory Opinions</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/maryland-removes-references-to-uspap-advisory-opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5979</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2014-2015 USPAP Now Available On-Line</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-2015-uspap-now-available-on-line/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-2015-uspap-now-available-on-line/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 2014-2015 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) is now available on-line. This edition of USPAP is valid for two years, effective January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015. The new edition includes the standards of professional practice for all appraisal disciplines as well as guidance from the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) in the form of USPAP Advisory Opinions and USPAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), featuring a compilation of more than 300 questions and answers. To access the 2014-2015 USPAP on-line edition, click here. Click here to view the video on 2012-13 USPAP changes. The Uniform&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-2015-uspap-now-available-on-line/">2014-2015 USPAP Now Available On-Line</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-2015-uspap-now-available-on-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5533</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2014-15 USPAP Modifications Released</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2014-15 modifications to USPAP become effective 1/1/2014 In preparation of the new 2014-15 modifications to USPAP effective January 1, ASA’s Ethic’s Committee has prepared a brief summary outlining the modifications. The Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) 2014-15 modifications to USPAP become effective January 1, 2014. These modifications include: Revisions to the DEFINITIONS of “Assignment Results” and “Scope of Work” — Based on comments received, there was a need to clarify the definition of ‘Assignment Results.’ In an appraisal assignment, assignment results currently include more than just the appraiser&#8217;s opinion of value, as the appraiser is responsible not only for the opinion&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/">2014-15 USPAP Modifications Released</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2014-15-uspap-modifications-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5465</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of Actions Related to Proposed USPAP Changes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2013-summary-of-actions-related-to-proposed-uspap-changes/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2013-summary-of-actions-related-to-proposed-uspap-changes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=4413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Potential changes and additions to USPAP On February 1, 2013, the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) adopted modifications to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). This action was the culmination of a period of 15 months and multiple discussion drafts, requests for comments, and three exposure drafts. Written comments were received in response to each document, and oral comments were provided at each public meeting. The ASB read and carefully considered every comment, developed a work plan to address the issues brought forward, and adopted revisions for the 2014-15 edition of USPAP. 1. Revisions adopted for 2014-15 USPAP The following&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2013-summary-of-actions-related-to-proposed-uspap-changes/">Summary of Actions Related to Proposed USPAP Changes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/2013-summary-of-actions-related-to-proposed-uspap-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4413</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Help for Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-help-for-appraisers/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-help-for-appraisers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I love movies, but I did not enjoy going to ‘The Help’ this past year with my wife. It probably stems from the fact that I wanted to attend the other theater (which was playing Captain America), but it was her turn to pick. The movie did, however, remind me of a time in our history where certain individuals were treated less than others. Not cool, and it made me very uncomfortable. There is another kind of ‘Help’ that many appraisers also find not so cool and makes them feel uncomfortable; that is… ANY HELP WHATSOEVER! For some odd reason,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-help-for-appraisers/">The Help for Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/the-help-for-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3875</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is That an Appraisal? USPAP Definition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/why-isnt-that-an-appraisal/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/why-isnt-that-an-appraisal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IDFPR Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker price opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collateral worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Market Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why Isn&#8217;t that an Appraisal? APPRAISAL: (noun) the act or process of developing an opinion of value; an opinion of value. (adjective) of or pertaining to appraising and related functions such as appraisal practice or appraisal services. Comment: An appraisal must be numerically expressed as a specific amount, as a range of numbers, or as a relationship (e.g., not more than, not less than) to a previous value opinion or numerical benchmark (e.g., assessed value, collateral value). In general terms the USPAP definition is elegant in its simplicity. We all understand what it is that appraisers provide. You provide opinions&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/why-isnt-that-an-appraisal/">Is That an Appraisal? USPAP Definition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/why-isnt-that-an-appraisal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3376</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Sense of Marketing Time and Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Marketing Time Strangely enough, USPAP 2012-2013 does not include a definition of Marketing Time. Marketing Time is only addressed in the Advisory Opinions (AO 7) and the Advise from the ASB is that reasonable marketing time is an opinion of the amount of time that might take to sell a property interest at the concluded market value during the period immediately after the effective date of an appraisal. Exposure Time USPAP requires an opinion of exposure time, not marketing time, when the purpose of the appraisal is to estimate market value. USPAP 2012-2013 defines Exposure Time as the estimated length&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/">Making Sense of Marketing Time and Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/making-sense-of-marketing-time-and-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2441</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the 2012 USPAP has a new development and reporting requirement? Effective January 1, 2012; when exposure time is a component of the definition for the value opinion being developed, the appraiser must also develop and state in the report an opinion of reasonable exposure time linked to that value opinion. The following is the exact language in the USPAP; DEFINITIONS Exposure Time: estimated length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/">Developing and Reporting Exposure Time</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/developing-and-reporting-exposure-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2357</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
