<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1004 - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/1004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/tag/1004/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Appraisers Are Historians</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-historians-tracking-the-motivations-of-the-moment</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-historians-tracking-the-motivations-of-the-moment#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Valuation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is gratifying when appraisers are correct, and the AVMs burn; unless you invested in their stocks.&#160; I mean no disrespect to the modelers of the Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) or to Zillow for relying on their AVMs. As an appraiser since the 80s, I have yet to find a computer that can tell me if I want vanilla or chocolate ice cream. Does the buyer want more acres, or less grass to cut? I will admit that a raised ranch, a two story farm house, a colonial, a split level, and a Dutch colonial can all sell for the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-historians-tracking-the-motivations-of-the-moment">Appraisers Are Historians</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-are-historians-tracking-the-motivations-of-the-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28059</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Flavors&#8221; of Appraisal Reports</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 13:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEE the differences between the THREE versions of the 1004 reports, what I euphemistically call &#8220;flavors.&#8221; Appraisers, recent watercooler discussions by appraisers focus on the new ‘desktop’ appraisals many will be requested to do. Now that the GSE’s have &#8220;formally&#8221; approved non-appraiser-inspected reports for first mortgage lending (or will very soon &#8211; not sure of the exact effective date), you may want to actually SEE the differences between the THREE versions of the 1004 reports, what I euphemistically call &#8220;flavors.&#8221; I spent a number of hours at the end of January reviewing our current &#8216;full&#8217; 1004 form, and the new&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports">&#8220;Flavors&#8221; of Appraisal Reports</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26350</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FHA Temporary Partial Waiver</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-temporary-partial-waiver-actual-reasoning-n-directive</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-temporary-partial-waiver-actual-reasoning-n-directive#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FHA Appraisers, on April 26, 2021, FHA issued this Temporary Partial Waiver, which is active for one year. This temporary partial waiver is effective for the 12-month period between April 26, 2021, and April 26, 2022. It is found in FHA INFO #21-25 April 27, 2021: Temporary Partial Waiver of the requirements of the single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1 Section II.D.4.c.iii.(F)(2) Required Analysis and Reporting that the Appraiser must include, analyze and report a minimum of two active listings or pending sales on the appraisal grid (in addition to at least three recently settled sales) in an Increasing Market&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-temporary-partial-waiver-actual-reasoning-n-directive">FHA Temporary Partial Waiver</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fha-temporary-partial-waiver-actual-reasoning-n-directive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25235</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highest and Best Use</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/highest-and-best-use-case-lender-dead-in-the-water</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/highest-and-best-use-case-lender-dead-in-the-water#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, I had a recent discussion with a review appraiser, who discussed a &#8216;situation&#8217; with me. It involved Highest and Best Use (H&#38;BU), and the appraiser&#8217;s reluctance to re-do a report so that a loan could be made. The appraiser had checked the H&#38;BU question box on page 1 of the 1004 form as &#8220;NO&#8221;, which immediately stops the lending process. This H&#38;BU topic is sometimes difficult for appraisers due to many variables which need to be analyzed. The twisted part of this situation (which influenced the appraiser&#8217;s H&#38;BU reporting) is the property is in an area where some, not all,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/highest-and-best-use-case-lender-dead-in-the-water">Highest and Best Use</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/highest-and-best-use-case-lender-dead-in-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24414</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Model Home Considered Occupied?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-a-model-home-considered-occupied-or-vacant</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-a-model-home-considered-occupied-or-vacant#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOTAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Two days later the underwriter emails you ordering you to change &#8220;vacant&#8221; to &#8220;occupied&#8221; since there is clearly furniture in the house&#8230; Here&#8217;s a situation you&#8217;ll run into once or twice in your career. There is a new subdivision. Now, new subdivisions sometimes have model homes. Model homes typically have furniture, fixtures, and equipment – usually upgraded. The subdivision has completed its sales program and the developer is now selling the model(s). Your job is to appraise one of the models, since the developer has it under contract to a retail buyer. You do your inspection thing, take pictures of&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/is-a-model-home-considered-occupied-or-vacant">Is a Model Home Considered Occupied?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/is-a-model-home-considered-occupied-or-vacant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24404</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not a Get Out of Jail Free Card</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/convoluted-times-pandemics-not-get-out-jail-free-card-4-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/convoluted-times-pandemics-not-get-out-jail-free-card-4-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is not misleading to use a 1004 form for a desktop or a drive-by because, during these convoluted times&#8230; In talking with Tim Andersen, a USPAP instructor and long-experienced appraiser, I was reminded that, even in the time of C-19, USPAP applies, and appraisals must still be credible. Reports must still not mislead. USPAP has never required the appraiser to inspect the property. That is a lender construct. So long as your scope of work is clear relative the level of inspection you provided, and why that was your scope of work, you should not have a problem. Note&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/convoluted-times-pandemics-not-get-out-jail-free-card-4-appraisers">Not a Get Out of Jail Free Card</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/convoluted-times-pandemics-not-get-out-jail-free-card-4-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23968</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lender Seeks to Overturn NY Appraiser-Friendly Statute of Limitations Law</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/sharestates-seeks-2-overturn-ny-appraiser-friendly-statute-of-limitations-law</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/sharestates-seeks-2-overturn-ny-appraiser-friendly-statute-of-limitations-law#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Christensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflated appraisals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sharestates operates a crowdfunding platform that provides alternative mortgage lending secured by both residential and commercial real estate. Over the last 10 years, it has reported average annual returns for loan investors ranging from 9.24% to 11.02%. With returns like these, there is likely some loan risk – and Sharestates reports a current foreclosure rate of 2.44%. Following several of its foreclosures, Sharestates has filed professional negligence cases against about a dozen defendant appraisers, appraisal firms and appraisal management companies, blaming the loan losses on inflated appraisals. Last year, it lost one of those cases in a Nassau County, New&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/sharestates-seeks-2-overturn-ny-appraiser-friendly-statute-of-limitations-law">Lender Seeks to Overturn NY Appraiser-Friendly Statute of Limitations Law</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/sharestates-seeks-2-overturn-ny-appraiser-friendly-statute-of-limitations-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23620</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incorrect Comments in Multi-Family Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/incorrect-comments-multi-family-appraisal-report</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/incorrect-comments-multi-family-appraisal-report#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URAR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=23272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have in my possession an appraisal for a DUPLEX (2 family residence) on a FNMA 1025/FrMac 72 form, commonly called the &#8216;1025 Form&#8217; which was done by a Certified Residential Appraiser licensed for 8 yrs, 6 months. Items &#8220;observed&#8221; in the report: UAD rating numbers are used for Quality and Condition. 1025 forms are not UAD coded, so why are these used? Please don’t tell me &#8220;the client said so&#8221; because the client is incorrect, and may not be aware. Use the standard wording for those items, and provide a definition description of the standard wording you use. The Highest and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/incorrect-comments-multi-family-appraisal-report">Incorrect Comments in Multi-Family Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/incorrect-comments-multi-family-appraisal-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23272</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hybrid Appraisals, Invitation to Fraud</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrids-invitation-2-fraud-new-subprime-fiasco</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrids-invitation-2-fraud-new-subprime-fiasco#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Until FNMA released their version of a test format for hybrids (1004P) there was not one hybrid form appraisal process and online form reporting system found that was not egregiously misleading in the entire country. Not one. Not Clarocity&#8217;s, nor Clear Capital&#8217;s or Mueller Inc. A &#8220;typical hybrid&#8221; sample follows. https://appraisersblogs.com/clearval-value-hybrid-appraisal Not those crafted in Hyderabad, Pakistan for $8 Billion for just one year&#8217;s Wall Street Investments (as published by Cezary Podkul Wall Street Journal) where the preparers claimed to be able to produce 360+ per day by illegally using broker login credentials from state-licensed brokers in America. The entire&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrids-invitation-2-fraud-new-subprime-fiasco">Hybrid Appraisals, Invitation to Fraud</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrids-invitation-2-fraud-new-subprime-fiasco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22124</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Observation &#038; Trigger Points</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Living Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall & Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plat map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Appraisal Dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, this is another essay written about a report I have &#8216;observed.&#8217; I’ve mentioned before that I &#8220;come in contact with&#8221; appraisal reports from a variety of sources. Those that I determine have significant issues I write about. Conclusions about the &#8216;real value&#8217; will be disclosed below. Trigger points for having reports formally reviewed are discussed. I do this because a majority of appraisers do not participate and interact with their peers on a consistent basis, and therefore may not get exposed to items that clients and lenders see in reports, which they question. I believe it’s important to expose items in reports that&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points">Report Observation &#038; Trigger Points</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-report-trigger-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20429</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you say &#8216;L-A-W-S-U-I-T&#8217; boys and girls?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/amrock-valuations-flawed-program</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/amrock-valuations-flawed-program#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amrock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fellow appraisers I strongly discourage anyone from accepting AMROCK Valuations work generally due to their poor track record in dealing with appraisers across the country; and their apparent habit of making up their own appraisal rules as they go along without regard to C&#38;R fees; Dodd Frank and most other common sense sound appraisal practices up to and including USPAP. Y&#8217;all remember USPAP don&#8217;t you? A series of uniform rules we&#8217;d all follow to promote, preserve and protect the American real estate appraisal profession and the American Public. That is until it became an inconvenient impediment to MISMO; FNMA and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/amrock-valuations-flawed-program">Can you say &#8216;L-A-W-S-U-I-T&#8217; boys and girls?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/amrock-valuations-flawed-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18795</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Simulator</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-simulator-waivers-evalutions-update</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-simulator-waivers-evalutions-update#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regression analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The industry is working of an appraisal simulator&#8230; The US House of Representatives Passed S 2155 today! Section 103 allows for waivers of appraisals by licensed appraisers in certain situations. See the bill here. Other News: Last week The National Association of Realtors held their Real Property Valuation Committee meeting. We have 2 VaCAP members on this committee. Here is a brief over view of the meeting from our representative in attendance. John Brenan with the Appraisal Qualifications Board (AQB) spoke at the meeting and gave an update on the roll back of licensing requirements that went into effect May 1st.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-simulator-waivers-evalutions-update">Appraisal Simulator</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-simulator-waivers-evalutions-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18065</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fix It Before Replacing It!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/fix-broken-product-stop-shortchanging-consumers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/fix-broken-product-stop-shortchanging-consumers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated valuation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Inspection Waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fix what is broken before replacing the product. Appraisers are talented professionals that know how to take mass amounts of data, filter through it, analyze &#38; make sense of it all. Utilize the talents of the 70,000 plus experienced, licensed professionals &#38; don&#8217;t short change the consumer&#8230; Yesterday was the National Association of Realtors Real Property Valuation Forum: Rethinking Real Estate Valuations: Alternatives to Traditional Appraisals. First, VaCAP was well represented with 8 members present from all over the state.  There were many of our Network colleagues there as well from all over the country. Thank you for taking the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/fix-broken-product-stop-shortchanging-consumers">Fix It Before Replacing It!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/fix-broken-product-stop-shortchanging-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18021</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Careless Order Takers?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/order-takers-AQB-claims-4-garbage-hybrids</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/order-takers-AQB-claims-4-garbage-hybrids#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Condition Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers were simply order takers&#8230; A friend that refers a lot of commercial work to me forwarded the following communications from an AMC. He’s been telling to ‘go away’ for some time now. This time he played along to see exactly what it is they are hustling. I’ve redacted my friends name and eliminated excessive line spacing and repetitive email signatures. I also bold highlighted references to John Brenan &#038; AQB communications. Otherwise it’s as copied from my email. We’ve all heard enough about hybrids so you can either read the copied emails or skip them. It’s the article from&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/order-takers-AQB-claims-4-garbage-hybrids">Careless Order Takers?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/order-takers-AQB-claims-4-garbage-hybrids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16226</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solution for Alternative Reports</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/solution-4-alternative-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/solution-4-alternative-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2055]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker Price Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lenders are having a problem finding enough appraisers to fulfill the number of &#8216;alternative&#8217; reports&#8230; This is my follow-up to the previous essay about FIVE different types of ‘hybrid’ reports. You need to know some background about why I’m writing about this. I’m acquainted with a highly skilled appraiser/instructor of 40+/- years in the trenches. I had the pleasure of meeting this appraiser in glitter gulch in 2008, again in 2013, and we have stayed in touch over the years. I greatly respect this appraiser’s opinions and willingness to contribute cogent remarks in-person, when teaching, and via various forum posts, etc.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/solution-4-alternative-reports">Solution for Alternative Reports</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/solution-4-alternative-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15906</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quit Overreporting!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae - Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why Do Appraisers Keep Overreporting&#8230;? Appraisers, Another friend has provided a copy of an appraisal on the friend’s home. Good golly, miss Molly&#8230; Why do appraisers keep overreporting comparable property data, which really isn’t comparable? This subject property is an 1,100 sq.ft. single story home, in a near-beach side community, with partial marine view, not on WFT, in a suburban location. Similar ‘comps’ are extremely limited (no more than 6 sales and 2 listings) due to its GLA, location, age, etc., based on the appraiser’s report, and my own research from multiple searches which proved similar comparable properties are almost non-existent. The report&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting">Quit Overreporting!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisers-quit-overreporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15808</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2017 Fee Survey Analyzing the Data</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/2017-fee-surveys-analyzing-data</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/2017-fee-surveys-analyzing-data#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Brauner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2055]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA appraisals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Valuation Code of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVCC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=15466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Surveys Said: Increasing Fees and Turn Times&#8230; For the last few years the appraisal industry has been abuzz with talk of rising appraisal fees and longer turn times. AMCs complain of a shortage of appraisers and “price gouging” in certain markets (Colorado and Oregon, for instance); appraisers report modest success at raising their fees after years of frustration (See Fees Rising). With over 7,000 appraisers responding so far, the results of the 2017 Working RE/OREP Appraiser Fee Survey is a current source for fee and turn time data by market and nationwide. To view the survey results for your market,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/2017-fee-surveys-analyzing-data">2017 Fee Survey Analyzing the Data</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/2017-fee-surveys-analyzing-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15466</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisal Forms Designs &#038; Purposes</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-forms-designs-purposes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-forms-designs-purposes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E&O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2055]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive by]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors & Omissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufactured home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=13842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>These forms were “designed” to be used for those specific purposes&#8230; Appraisers, Earlier this week, I discussed the following about some lenders requesting a type of property inspection to be completed on a form “Not Designed” for the specific property type: Original observation discussed earlier this week: Read the highlighted sentence. Read the highlighted sentence again. According to a regional bank in my area, via info from their AMC, “thousands” of Manufactured Home appraisals have been done on the 2055 form. Do you do that, just because someone – who just wants to “make a sale” – tells you to&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-forms-designs-purposes">Appraisal Forms Designs &#038; Purposes</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-forms-designs-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13842</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe Room Adjustment in Appraisals</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/safe-room-adjustment-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/safe-room-adjustment-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1004MC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe room]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=9983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Use of a Safe Room has Increased by Property Owners Appraisers, If you’re doing a standard 1004 SFR, or 1073 condo (or perhaps a Co-op), report and encounter a &#8220;Safe Room&#8220;, you might need to add that to one of the extra adjustable component lines on the grid. The trick however, is how do you determine the value of such a safe room and apply a proper adjustment? I suspect they vary in size, interior amenities, vault door construction, and bazooka stopping power of their perimeter wall structure. I dunno! If encountered, I think I’d call Jonathan Miller, who is&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/safe-room-adjustment-appraisals">Safe Room Adjustment in Appraisals</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/safe-room-adjustment-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9983</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CU &#8220;Enhancements&#8221; Are Coming</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Quality Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collateral Underwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datappraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Collateral Data Portal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CU risk score, flags and messages Appraisers, In about 6 weeks, Fannie Mae will make available to LENDERS only, and probably by default indirectly, to their AMC agents, enhancements or improvements (in their opinion) to the Collateral Underwriter electronic review process. None of the Collateral Underwriter background info,  especially about Fannie Mae&#8217;s &#8216;additional comps&#8217; selection process, is shared directly with appraisers.  But when these are returned to appraisers in the form of a Quality Assurance request from the lender or AMC, appraisers are expected to drop everything and immediately review those for applicability in the appraisal report. Pay attention to the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/">CU &#8220;Enhancements&#8221; Are Coming</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8547</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
