Comments on: ND Banks Seeking to Kill Consumer Protection

By: Carl

Carl — Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:01:27 +0000

Thanks for the heads up Mike. I emailed Mr. Park

By: Baggins

Baggins — Sat, 20 Apr 2019 00:52:11 +0000

They’re just not that bright. It’s obviously too complicated of a business concept for the bankers to hire an appraiser, and hire a trainee, pay them fairly, and then have two appraisers instead of the near future zero appraisers.

And who said we can’t trust these guys with economics and personal savings?

By: Kathy Hubbard Bright on Facebook

Kathy Hubbard Bright on Facebook — Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:10:06 +0000

All it takes is one state to set a precedent.

By: marion

marion — Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:53:29 +0000

Why, are they issuing licenses to out of state appraisers, who then don’t count, for working in the state?

Huuummmmmm, is this a scam by the state licensing board too?

By: Bill Johnson

Bill Johnson — Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:09:14 +0000

The truth is, most of our residential clients and the government are knowingly and actively through their own actions trying to create an environment where one day there will be a shortage of appraisers (just not today). By controlling fees (TRID), not enforcing C&R, voting down separation of AMC fees, increasing entry standards, lying to the public about AVM’s, expanding scopes of work (FHA), flawed CU, etc., etc., their negative actions are visible to those who have their eyes open. When my county (San Diego) has 3.1 million people, and 1,000 local in county appraisers, are you going to hear from the banks how its routine to have 5 day turn times in a single county that has 4 times the appraisal volume as compared to the entire state of ND, of course not.

All it will take is one bank, in one county, and in one state to set the precedent.

Seek the truth.