<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hybrid Appraisal Products &#038; Public Trust	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: angel		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no way its USPAP compliant as these companies state. USPAP says you must do a physical inspection of the property. I ask the lenders this &#8220;would you sign your name to another loan officers work not knowing weather its a bad loan or not?&#8220; The answer is no! Why would I use a brokers information with out inspections the property? The broker is in this to make a sale and a commission, just as the loan officer is. The only one is this not making a commission and looking out for the house as advocate is the appraiser. Good Bad or INDIFFERENT
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way its USPAP compliant as these companies state. USPAP says you must do a physical inspection of the property. I ask the lenders this &#8220;would you sign your name to another loan officers work not knowing weather its a bad loan or not?&#8220; The answer is no! Why would I use a brokers information with out inspections the property? The broker is in this to make a sale and a commission, just as the loan officer is. The only one is this not making a commission and looking out for the house as advocate is the appraiser. Good Bad or INDIFFERENT</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16252" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16228</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I spoke with a machinery and equipment appraiser from ASA the other day. HIS business is still challenging and exciting like ours used to be. His clients routinely send him out of state for large M&#038;E assignments.

I think I&#039;ll talk to ASA again soon. Same with NACVA for business valuation. Check YOUR state and see who licenses or regulates them! (no one). There are professional peers who may judge your work but that&#039;s nothing like the fiasco they turned RE appraisal into.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with a machinery and equipment appraiser from ASA the other day. HIS business is still challenging and exciting like ours used to be. His clients routinely send him out of state for large M&amp;E assignments.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll talk to ASA again soon. Same with NACVA for business valuation. Check YOUR state and see who licenses or regulates them! (no one). There are professional peers who may judge your work but that&#8217;s nothing like the fiasco they turned RE appraisal into.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16228" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to the NAR survey, typical appraisers are dissatisfied with the direction of automation driven valuation models at a ratio of 2 to 1.  67.3% of respondents were unhappy with automation models.  Even more than were unhappy with amc modeling.  Double the dissatisfaction numbers I would say, because most appraisers don&#039;t even bother to voice an opinion these days.  Their opinions have been summarily ignored for a decade now as amc&#039;s steer the industry instead of appraisers.

Think it&#039;s a coincidence that when the fees go upward consistently for the first time in a decade, fnma suddenly allows the use of trainees? Think again.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.scribd.com/document/342075358/Appraiser-Trends-Study-03-16-17&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NAR Appraiser Trends Study 03/2017&lt;/a&gt;


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the NAR survey, typical appraisers are dissatisfied with the direction of automation driven valuation models at a ratio of 2 to 1.  67.3% of respondents were unhappy with automation models.  Even more than were unhappy with amc modeling.  Double the dissatisfaction numbers I would say, because most appraisers don&#8217;t even bother to voice an opinion these days.  Their opinions have been summarily ignored for a decade now as amc&#8217;s steer the industry instead of appraisers.</p>
<p>Think it&#8217;s a coincidence that when the fees go upward consistently for the first time in a decade, fnma suddenly allows the use of trainees? Think again.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scribd.com/document/342075358/Appraiser-Trends-Study-03-16-17" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">NAR Appraiser Trends Study 03/2017</a></p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16206" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryder		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t touch this, in our area your lucky if the realtor can measure the square footage. The honest of brokers VS appraisers on photos, no way would we take the risk. Lets face it when the deal goes sour they will be looking for the appraiser. No Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t touch this, in our area your lucky if the realtor can measure the square footage. The honest of brokers VS appraisers on photos, no way would we take the risk. Lets face it when the deal goes sour they will be looking for the appraiser. No Thanks</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16174" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; is nothing more than a feel good justification for any federal or state legislature or regulatory agency to justify whatever &lt;em&gt;OPPOSITE effect&lt;/em&gt; policies they want to adopt for the convenience of the moment; or benefit of their donors.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; was the excuse for HVCC.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; was the reason Dodd Frank paid unenforceable lip service to Reasonable and Customary Fees.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot; &lt;/strong&gt;is why the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice were adopted as the minimum acceptable standards for federally regulated transactions,

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot; &lt;/strong&gt;is why the GSEs were created.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; is what most state regulatory agencies claim to be protecting when THEY perform their&lt;em&gt; non USPAP compliant &quot;reviews&quot; to unspecified standards that fall far short of USPAP in order to judge OUR USPAP compliance&lt;/em&gt;! &lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot; &lt;/strong&gt;preservation is how state regulators (like those in Oregon, California, Minnesota or Maryland) that routinely jump to violation settlement stipulations and consent agreements for newly re-interpreted (by them) USPAP requirements that ASB knows nothing about.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Public Trust&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; is as meaningless as &quot;I&#039;m from the government and I&#039;m here to help.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221;</strong> is nothing more than a feel good justification for any federal or state legislature or regulatory agency to justify whatever <em>OPPOSITE effect</em> policies they want to adopt for the convenience of the moment; or benefit of their donors.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221;</strong> was the excuse for HVCC.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221;</strong> was the reason Dodd Frank paid unenforceable lip service to Reasonable and Customary Fees.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221; </strong>is why the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice were adopted as the minimum acceptable standards for federally regulated transactions,</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221; </strong>is why the GSEs were created.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221;</strong> is what most state regulatory agencies claim to be protecting when THEY perform their<em> non USPAP compliant &#8220;reviews&#8221; to unspecified standards that fall far short of USPAP in order to judge OUR USPAP compliance</em>! <strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221; </strong>preservation is how state regulators (like those in Oregon, California, Minnesota or Maryland) that routinely jump to violation settlement stipulations and consent agreements for newly re-interpreted (by them) USPAP requirements that ASB knows nothing about.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Public Trust&#8221;</strong> is as meaningless as &#8220;I&#8217;m from the government and I&#8217;m here to help.&#8221;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16132" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seneca		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seneca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Clear Capital is spitting these offers out $100 a pop for Chase and they are being gobbled up. I say shame on you appraisers in Central Ohio that are accepting these orders and are still accepting full 1004s for $350. There is too much work in Ohio over the last three years to keep low balling. You appraisers are ilk of the profession. You keep letting the AMCs win. Stand your ground. There is a ton of work. Get paid. Quit bring my income down with yours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clear Capital is spitting these offers out $100 a pop for Chase and they are being gobbled up. I say shame on you appraisers in Central Ohio that are accepting these orders and are still accepting full 1004s for $350. There is too much work in Ohio over the last three years to keep low balling. You appraisers are ilk of the profession. You keep letting the AMCs win. Stand your ground. There is a ton of work. Get paid. Quit bring my income down with yours.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16116" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/hybrid-appraisal-public-trust/#comment-16097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=14005#comment-16097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hybrid Appraisals, Hybrid Risks because we do not know what the ramifications will be until these types of appraisals break the bank so to say. Don&#039;t remember the name, but wasn&#039;t about two years ago they came out with a report that was said not to be an appraisal but wanted a value? Didn&#039;t do those either. I&#039;ll let others take the risks and the fall out you know that will come their way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hybrid Appraisals, Hybrid Risks because we do not know what the ramifications will be until these types of appraisals break the bank so to say. Don&#8217;t remember the name, but wasn&#8217;t about two years ago they came out with a report that was said not to be an appraisal but wanted a value? Didn&#8217;t do those either. I&#8217;ll let others take the risks and the fall out you know that will come their way.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="16097" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
