<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Revision to GSE Forms Coming?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 04:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Caterina Platt		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-20133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caterina Platt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-20133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave said: If FHFA actually takes this on, wouldn’t it be nice if they included actual working appraisers (especially residential types) on the form re-design committee?!

I have been saying this for years, and have been scoffed at as though we appraisers thought so much of ourselves to be included in the process. &#039;You serve a client&#039;s purpose. It is their prerogative to design what they need from you.&#039; Really now? Forgive me for steppin&#039; outta line, Master. -_- The forms are part of our daily tools. Perhaps an appraiser can sit down with some of the non-appraisers at the GSEs and discuss some of the less useful portions of their forms and perhaps what is missing that should be included. For instance, the &#039;Price per Room and Price per Bedroom&#039; silliness on the lower section of the sales grid on the 1025. How about the entirely convoluted way they have us filling out the Neighborhood and Market Trends on Page 1 considering the advent of the 1004MC? I actually have a color coded print out pinned to my office wall. Perhaps we could revamp a real market analysis form that would provide useful trending information and ditch the 1004MC altogether?

Can we get rid of the &#039;predominant&#039; value?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave said: If FHFA actually takes this on, wouldn’t it be nice if they included actual working appraisers (especially residential types) on the form re-design committee?!</p>
<p>I have been saying this for years, and have been scoffed at as though we appraisers thought so much of ourselves to be included in the process. &#8216;You serve a client&#8217;s purpose. It is their prerogative to design what they need from you.&#8217; Really now? Forgive me for steppin&#8217; outta line, Master. -_- The forms are part of our daily tools. Perhaps an appraiser can sit down with some of the non-appraisers at the GSEs and discuss some of the less useful portions of their forms and perhaps what is missing that should be included. For instance, the &#8216;Price per Room and Price per Bedroom&#8217; silliness on the lower section of the sales grid on the 1025. How about the entirely convoluted way they have us filling out the Neighborhood and Market Trends on Page 1 considering the advent of the 1004MC? I actually have a color coded print out pinned to my office wall. Perhaps we could revamp a real market analysis form that would provide useful trending information and ditch the 1004MC altogether?</p>
<p>Can we get rid of the &#8216;predominant&#8217; value?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20133" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 02:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18821&quot;&gt;Koma&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m here to serve *g*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18821">Koma</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m here to serve *g*</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18836" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 00:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18818&quot;&gt;Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®&lt;/a&gt;.

LOL @ an avg of $65 a report I&#039;m guessing the answer is NO. Gave me a hearty laugh though Mike. Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18818">Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®</a>.</p>
<p>LOL @ an avg of $65 a report I&#8217;m guessing the answer is NO. Gave me a hearty laugh though Mike. Thanks!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18821" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18818</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 00:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18787&quot;&gt;Koma&lt;/a&gt;.

You always charge $350 for the desktop... if they are willing to pay that much, then give them as good a desktop product as you can - fully USPAP compliant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18787">Koma</a>.</p>
<p>You always charge $350 for the desktop&#8230; if they are willing to pay that much, then give them as good a desktop product as you can &#8211; fully USPAP compliant.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18818" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18787</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 02:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not to get off subject, but got another call from an AMC telling me in a round about way that they are having a hard time getting appraisers to perform desktops in my areas. Drum roll and hear it comes.....Would I like to join...cut them off stating don&#039;t mean to be rude but we DO NOT perform desktop (useless form) appraisals. Have a nice day...click My experience is client sends out desktop and within 24 hrs a 2055 comes in on the same property for 5 times the fee of that desktop.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get off subject, but got another call from an AMC telling me in a round about way that they are having a hard time getting appraisers to perform desktops in my areas. Drum roll and hear it comes&#8230;..Would I like to join&#8230;cut them off stating don&#8217;t mean to be rude but we DO NOT perform desktop (useless form) appraisals. Have a nice day&#8230;click My experience is client sends out desktop and within 24 hrs a 2055 comes in on the same property for 5 times the fee of that desktop.  </p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18787" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth Smith		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18736&quot;&gt;Pattie P.&lt;/a&gt;.

I could not have said it better!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18736">Pattie P.</a>.</p>
<p>I could not have said it better!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18786" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe if they design the new forms to be printed on continuous rolls of paper...say about 4 1/2 to 5 inches wide it would improve them. They could even sell them in pastel colors or other decorative motifs. Users could just tear them off wherever they feel they have enough. I think this could &#039;bring it all together&#039;. FNMA would then have a form ideally suited to the product that they are asking appraisers to produce.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if they design the new forms to be printed on continuous rolls of paper&#8230;say about 4 1/2 to 5 inches wide it would improve them. They could even sell them in pastel colors or other decorative motifs. Users could just tear them off wherever they feel they have enough. I think this could &#8216;bring it all together&#8217;. FNMA would then have a form ideally suited to the product that they are asking appraisers to produce.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18764" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ross Grannan on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Grannan on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More meaningless fluff for underwriters to get hot and bothered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More meaningless fluff for underwriters to get hot and bothered</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18740" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e. j. b.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e. j. b.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m here to tell anyone who&#039;ll listen, THERE IS NO BIG DATA IN RURAL S.E. GEORGIA, and I will not be buying any regression analysis tool for no good reason! I have not been making adjustments, except for site value and gross living area, and maybe for sales concessions, for however long ago the &quot;prove your adjustments&quot; down to the last dollar crap started.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m here to tell anyone who&#8217;ll listen, THERE IS NO BIG DATA IN RURAL S.E. GEORGIA, and I will not be buying any regression analysis tool for no good reason! I have not been making adjustments, except for site value and gross living area, and maybe for sales concessions, for however long ago the &#8220;prove your adjustments&#8221; down to the last dollar crap started.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18737" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pattie P.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pattie P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rather than fix what is really wrong with the  industry let&#039;s just monkey around with the forms again to make it look like we&#039;re actually doing something. Heaven forbid that we actually get involved and stop the abusive practices, psychological and financial warfare that the independent fee appraisers have been dealing with for the past 10 years, the stealing of data and intellectual property by the GSE&#039;S and AMC&#039;s, and they bastardization of the appraisal process with these stupid hybrid appraisal ideas. Time for the FHFA step in and put a stop to this nonsense or relinquish control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than fix what is really wrong with the  industry let&#8217;s just monkey around with the forms again to make it look like we&#8217;re actually doing something. Heaven forbid that we actually get involved and stop the abusive practices, psychological and financial warfare that the independent fee appraisers have been dealing with for the past 10 years, the stealing of data and intellectual property by the GSE&#8217;S and AMC&#8217;s, and they bastardization of the appraisal process with these stupid hybrid appraisal ideas. Time for the FHFA step in and put a stop to this nonsense or relinquish control.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18736" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana N.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They keep making retirement look better and better. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They keep making retirement look better and better. </p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18735" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Revised fors AND data requirements. This could either be a huge boon (not likely); or a giant PITA! If the idiot mind set that created 1004MC continues to prevail, I can imagine us now having to include the regression analysis used to support all adjustments...whether we use it or not. The data-dingleberry set is simply not going to accept the limitations of so called big data.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revised fors AND data requirements. This could either be a huge boon (not likely); or a giant PITA! If the idiot mind set that created 1004MC continues to prevail, I can imagine us now having to include the regression analysis used to support all adjustments&#8230;whether we use it or not. The data-dingleberry set is simply not going to accept the limitations of so called big data.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18734" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18727&quot;&gt;e. j. b.&lt;/a&gt;.

Every time you send a link or refer others to this site, we take more control back.  The appraisal valuation industry belongs to appraisers, and nobody else.  Individual appraisal licensing for ALL appraisal order distribution workers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18727">e. j. b.</a>.</p>
<p>Every time you send a link or refer others to this site, we take more control back.  The appraisal valuation industry belongs to appraisers, and nobody else.  Individual appraisal licensing for ALL appraisal order distribution workers.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18732" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good lord, another update?  Will every tech programmer on the planet please take a very very long vacation.   If a person can not speak English, I&#039;m happy with them not being able to use our tools or get equivalent access.  The great 100 year American firesale is over.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord, another update?  Will every tech programmer on the planet please take a very very long vacation.   If a person can not speak English, I&#8217;m happy with them not being able to use our tools or get equivalent access.  The great 100 year American firesale is over.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18731" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana N.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More work for less money, same old story. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More work for less money, same old story. </p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18730" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koma		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will they talk to actual working appraisers? IDK ask the ones who worked on UAD or maybe the 1004MC POS. hahaha We will find out a couple of months before it&#039;s ready to roll out. That&#039;s how things work these days. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they talk to actual working appraisers? IDK ask the ones who worked on UAD or maybe the 1004MC POS. hahaha We will find out a couple of months before it&#8217;s ready to roll out. That&#8217;s how things work these days. </p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18729" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e. j. b.		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e. j. b.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Software cost will be going through the roof. Appraisal fees will remain the same as long as AMC&#039;s continue to think they are running the show.. So sad :~(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Software cost will be going through the roof. Appraisal fees will remain the same as long as AMC&#8217;s continue to think they are running the show.. So sad :~(</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18727" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SoCalAppraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/gse-appraisal-forms-revision/#comment-18726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SoCalAppraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=16052#comment-18726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Probably about as much as appraisers charged for the 1004MC. Free!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably about as much as appraisers charged for the 1004MC. Free!!!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="18726" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
