<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Flavors&#8221; of Appraisal Reports	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CJK		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My buddy just called to tell me that he is doing a full 1004 (inspection with photos) on a property that just had a desktop. The seller and listing agent were upset that the first appraiser did not look at the property. So now the lender has to pay $700 for a new appraisal because they already charged the borrower for the desktop. So how is this disaster saving anyone any money? Way to go FNMA, you screwed up another one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My buddy just called to tell me that he is doing a full 1004 (inspection with photos) on a property that just had a desktop. The seller and listing agent were upset that the first appraiser did not look at the property. So now the lender has to pay $700 for a new appraisal because they already charged the borrower for the desktop. So how is this disaster saving anyone any money? Way to go FNMA, you screwed up another one.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33547" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CJK		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33408&quot;&gt;CJK&lt;/a&gt;.

Update from my first post: 

One of my lenders just got back to me she said that none of the appraisers on the approved panel will be doing the desktops, GOOD FOR THEM, stay united. So far of my 6 lender clients the appraisers who work for 3 of them have said no. Many of these appraisers also work for the other 3 lenders. My lender clients detest AMCs so we will see how this all plays out. FNMA I will not be doing $100 reports, nor will I ever put my clients at risk. Skippy can do it. I just need to hold out for 3 more years. I feel sorry for the new appraisers, make sure your E&#038;O covers you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33408">CJK</a>.</p>
<p>Update from my first post: </p>
<p>One of my lenders just got back to me she said that none of the appraisers on the approved panel will be doing the desktops, GOOD FOR THEM, stay united. So far of my 6 lender clients the appraisers who work for 3 of them have said no. Many of these appraisers also work for the other 3 lenders. My lender clients detest AMCs so we will see how this all plays out. FNMA I will not be doing $100 reports, nor will I ever put my clients at risk. Skippy can do it. I just need to hold out for 3 more years. I feel sorry for the new appraisers, make sure your E&amp;O covers you.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33425" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33415&quot;&gt;That Scott guy&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Scott.   This:  https://appraisersblogs.com/desktop-appraisals-has-the-devil-infiltrated-the-public-trust#comment-33372
Get to know the argument how amc&#039;s were supposed to be effectively regulated but side skirted the entire point of their regulation in the first place.  How it happened, why it happened, and what can be done about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33415">That Scott guy</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Scott.   This:  <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/desktop-appraisals-has-the-devil-infiltrated-the-public-trust#comment-33372" rel="ugc">https://appraisersblogs.com/desktop-appraisals-has-the-devil-infiltrated-the-public-trust#comment-33372</a><br />
Get to know the argument how amc&#8217;s were supposed to be effectively regulated but side skirted the entire point of their regulation in the first place.  How it happened, why it happened, and what can be done about it.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33422" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: That Scott guy		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Scott guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33412&quot;&gt;HELEN&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot; 1) AMC’s are taking a lion’s share for each one done...&quot;
The first one of these sent to me the AMC was paying $115 and charging the lender $400. No joke.

I say this every time, but these desktop products are the death rattle of the appraisal profession.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33412">HELEN</a>.</p>
<p>&#8221; 1) AMC’s are taking a lion’s share for each one done&#8230;&#8221;<br />
The first one of these sent to me the AMC was paying $115 and charging the lender $400. No joke.</p>
<p>I say this every time, but these desktop products are the death rattle of the appraisal profession.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33415" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33412&quot;&gt;HELEN&lt;/a&gt;.

Helen, excellent.  If I may politely add;  Corporate interests are progressing into real estate at a rapid pace and are also pushing for a more commercialized model as they seek to turn an increasing volume of properties to rentals.  Even accepting the use of LIDAR 3d modeling technology for hybrid inspection results in individual homes having a new and more detailed &#039;digital fingerprint&#039; within cloud based data systems.  This lines them up for further exploitation down the line once chain of data custody is broken as privacy rules and client confidentiality rules do not carry the same applicability into the future.  Desktops with remote third party inspectors are a data goldmine for big tech seeking to break further into real estate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33412">HELEN</a>.</p>
<p>Helen, excellent.  If I may politely add;  Corporate interests are progressing into real estate at a rapid pace and are also pushing for a more commercialized model as they seek to turn an increasing volume of properties to rentals.  Even accepting the use of LIDAR 3d modeling technology for hybrid inspection results in individual homes having a new and more detailed &#8216;digital fingerprint&#8217; within cloud based data systems.  This lines them up for further exploitation down the line once chain of data custody is broken as privacy rules and client confidentiality rules do not carry the same applicability into the future.  Desktops with remote third party inspectors are a data goldmine for big tech seeking to break further into real estate.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33414" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HELEN		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HELEN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33408&quot;&gt;CJK&lt;/a&gt;.

They are being pushed because: 1) AMC&#039;s are taking a lion&#039;s share for each one done  2) the software originator&#039;s are getting a piece of the action 3) the third parties are taking no responsibility 4) we are the only ones standing in the way of this 5) they are getting well known veteran appraisers to sell their businesses to jump on their bandwagon...for a price.  I will not do them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33408">CJK</a>.</p>
<p>They are being pushed because: 1) AMC&#8217;s are taking a lion&#8217;s share for each one done  2) the software originator&#8217;s are getting a piece of the action 3) the third parties are taking no responsibility 4) we are the only ones standing in the way of this 5) they are getting well known veteran appraisers to sell their businesses to jump on their bandwagon&#8230;for a price.  I will not do them.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33412" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CJK		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/flavors-of-appraisal-reports/#comment-33408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26350#comment-33408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of my lenders called to see if I would be doing the desktops. I told her no, she said if the other appraisers on the panel said no that the UW would most likely just stay with the full 1004 (appraiser inspection with photos). They believe the desktops are too much of a risk for the appraisers and the lender. They do not understand why FNMA is pushing this on everyone. She asked me why would an appraiser want to take on this liability, I said many of us will not and you get what you pay for. We will see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my lenders called to see if I would be doing the desktops. I told her no, she said if the other appraisers on the panel said no that the UW would most likely just stay with the full 1004 (appraiser inspection with photos). They believe the desktops are too much of a risk for the appraisers and the lender. They do not understand why FNMA is pushing this on everyone. She asked me why would an appraiser want to take on this liability, I said many of us will not and you get what you pay for. We will see.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="33408" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
