<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ASB - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal-organizations/the-appraisal-standards-board/asb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal-organizations/the-appraisal-standards-board/asb/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 04:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed update of professional guidelines for property appraisals contains confusing language about what constitutes discrimination, and would even suggest appraisers could engage in “ethical” discrimination.&#160; Folks, the following article is in the ABA Banking Journal e-newsletter, posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2023. I’m really glad this has been released. Hopefully the Appraisal Standards Board will closely examine the concerns of the regulators. I read the USPAP 4th Exposure Draft. It contains so much new Ethics Rule “legaleze” language about conduct that it is, and can be, overwhelmingly confusing to a majority of appraisers. It’s written by lawyers in such&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition">Confusing Language for USPAP Ethics Rule Addition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/confusing-language-4-uspap-ethics-rule-addition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Confusing-Language-for-USPAP-Ethics-Rule-Addition.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28719</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census tract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=28183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, should we include discussion of B&#38;D in our reports? Wait, What?? Bondage and Discipline? No, not that. Bias and Discrimination. Yes, it must be addressed very clearly. Now, before you blow a cork or throw your mouse at the computer screen, let’s examine what’s really been impacting ‘us’ for the past 4 plus years. One of our peers, who’s become somewhat famous for the way articles are written about appraisal and other topics, had a recent article ‘rebroadcasted’ in AppraisersBlogs, FTX Bought Government&#8217;s Silence; Did Fintechs Buy Attacks on Appraisers? A statement in that article exposes some of what has&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports">Bias and Discrimination in Reports, Yes or No?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/should-appraisers-include-discussion-of-bias-and-discrimination-in-appraisal-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28183</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Future editions of USPAP will have an effective start date but no end date. Folks, on Thursday August 11, 2022, the ASB/TAF announced the extension of the current USPAP to the end of 2023. Assuming that a ‘new’ USPAP is formally approved in time, the next issue of USPAP will become effective January 1, 2024. But here’s the interesting wrinkle about this, which I admit I missed in their 8/11/22 announcement: &#8220;How long is the current version of USPAP effective? With this announcement, the 2020-21 USPAP will now have an effective date through December 31, 2023. This is an additional&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap">No End Date for Future Editions of USPAP</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/no-end-date-4-future-editions-of-uspap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27611</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP Third Exposure Draft</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competency rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=27505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. Folks, the Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board released the THIRD Exposure Draft to USPAP on July 26, 2022. To be honest, I didn’t know there have been two previous Exposure Drafts. I would encourage you to download and print this Draft here. The PDF is also embedded below. It’s only 11 pages total. The key difference in this Draft is that the Ethics Rule has been expanded with a new highly detailed Nondiscrimination section, which also affects the Competency Rule. You&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section">USPAP Third Exposure Draft</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-third-exposure-draft-n-proposed-addition-of-a-nondiscrimination-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27505</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Removing the Definition of Personal Inspection</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=26312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why is the ASB proposing to remove the definition of Personal Inspection? Several days ago, an appraiser posted the following comment which we have decided to publish as a free-standing post because we believe it deserves attention: Amazingly, while these are horrible – everyone seems to miss the real issue that will hit us all in 2023. As of 2023, if the ASB gets its way in a few weeks, the word “inspection” or “personal inspection” will no longer be defined in USPAP. That means they don’t even have to play this game. “Desktop” appraisal is just a stopgap until&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection">Removing the Definition of Personal Inspection</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/removing-the-definition-of-personal-inspection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26312</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraiser Qualifications Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=25774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers, if your license renews in 2022, you will need to take the ‘new’ USPAP 7hr Update course. See below. The Update class you have already taken for the 2020-21 book, which has been extended to Dec. 31, 2022, cannot be used for CE credit again. However, I’m somewhat confused as to the effective dates of this ‘new’ Update class. It says “2022-23” which implies it will be valid through the end of (or into?) 2023. But the ‘current’ USPAP is presently undergoing Exposure Drafts for the proposed changes, which will be effective as of Jan. 1, 2023.  Normally, the Update&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course">2022 7hr USPAP Update Course</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/2022-7hr-uspap-update-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25774</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPAP 2020-2021 Extension</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronavirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2020-21 USPAP Extension &#8211; Does this mean USPAP will be on a three-year cycle going forward? USPAP has been extended for one year, effective through December, 31, 2022. This is the Appraisal Foundation news release, issued on Feb. 19, 2021: Media Contact: Amy Timmerman (202) 624-3048 amy@appraisalfoundation.org BREAKING: 2020-21 USPAP Extended for One Year (Washington, DC) February 19, 2021 – The Appraisal Foundation’s Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) announced today that the current edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) will be extended by one year. The 2020-2021 USPAP will now be effective until December 31, 2022. “USPAP&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022">USPAP 2020-2021 Extension</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-2020-21-extension-effective-through-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24973</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board have released the 4th Exposure Draft to the FUTURE version (2022-23) of USPAP. I, like so many other ‘stakeholders’ and appraisers, have grown weary of the incessant Exposure Drafts and updates to our mandated PROTOCOL MANUAL, which for many years has been massaged and modified in various ways every 2 years. Largely because new members cycle onto the ASB every year or two. The constant updates has resulted into a continuing cash cow for the Appraisal Foundation / Appraisal Standards Board. But in actual use, that should not happen because USPAP is codified&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes">Pending Future Changes in USPAP 2022-23</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/pending-future-uspap-2022-23-changes-time-2-quit-constant-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercutting the Appraisal Profession</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AAREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Association of Real Estate Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=24196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposed Revision to STANDARDS RULE 2-2&#8230;a change that would undercut the appraisal profession in a major way&#8230; Comments on the proposed changes to the 2022-23 USPAP are needed. The proposed changes to the reporting requirement of Standard 2 may impact the profession negatively and confuse the public on who we are and what we do. We ask that each and every one of you pause for a moment and comment by July 30th. Below is what was sent out to the Arizona Association of Real Estate Appraisers by Joanna Conde. Virginia also requires anyone using the title appraiser, be licensed.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession">Undercutting the Appraisal Profession</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/uspap-standards-rule-proposed-revision-undercutting-appraisal-profession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24196</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenders Want to Eliminate DTI Cap!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-want-2-eliminate-DTI-cap</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-want-2-eliminate-DTI-cap#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Inspection Waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No DTI CAPS &#8211; What could go wrong? Well, the insanity continues. HousingWire is reporting that a coalition of lenders and trade groups are calling on the CFPB to eliminate the debt to income cap on all qualified mortgages. Yes, you read that right. Lenders want to eliminate the debt to income cap to allow more loans to be originated. They claim by using alternative factors to determine risks, more low income borrowers can obtain a mortgage. Mortgage Bankers Association President and CEO Robert Broeksmit stated: With respect to the 43% DTI threshold, it makes little sense to commit to a rigid requirement&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-want-2-eliminate-DTI-cap">Lenders Want to Eliminate DTI Cap!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/lenders-want-2-eliminate-DTI-cap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22698</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ICAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal threshold levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de minimis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quicken Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Evaluations: Concept Paper, Webinar, Public Meeting In early August, The Appraisal Foundation announced that the The Appraisal Standards Board would be considering adopting standards for evaluations in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). On September 3, 2019, they announced three opportunities to learn more and share your insights. Concept Paper The Appraisal Standards Board is seeking your feedback on the concept of developing standards for performing evaluations in USPAP. Submit your comments to ASBcomments@appraisalfoundation.org. The comment period closes on October 11, 2019. Read the evaluations concept paper here Webinar Wayne Miller, chair of the Appraisal Standards Board, and&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella">Bringing Evaluations Under USPAP&#8217;s Umbrella</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/evaluations-concept-paper-bringing-evaluations-under-USPAP-umbrella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="http://appraisersblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NPR-appraisal-threshold.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />

		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22659</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gladiator Appraiser, Pat Turner</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of appraisal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Regulatory reform is needed in the appraisal profession and Pat Turner is the right appraiser to help move it forward! This is a CALL TO ACTION. Please listen to Phil Crawford&#8217;s Voice of Appraisal Show released yesterday morning. He has put out a call to action to every appraiser to write a letter of recommendation for VaCAP President Pat Turner to be appointed to the Appraisal Standards Board: Time to stand up again! Pat Turner, &#8220;The Gladiator Appraiser&#8221;, from the Great Commonwealth of Virginia has applied for a position on the Appraisal Standards Board at The Appraisal Foundation! Now more&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board">The Gladiator Appraiser, Pat Turner</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/recommend-pat-turner-4-appraisal-standards-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22557</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competitors on State Appraisal Boards</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/state-appraisal-boards-competitors-nsao-supports-hr-3619</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/state-appraisal-boards-competitors-nsao-supports-hr-3619#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser trainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice of appraisal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=22548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Phil Crawford has a new Voice of Appraisal show. This is one of the best shows Phil has ever done. He touches on issues with Bifurcation, Board competitors and even mentions VaCAP and our “Other Side of Things” article that received a lot of attention on Appraisers Blogs last week. Phil encourages support for VaCAP President Pat Turner to be appointed to the Appraisal Standards Board. The show is 36 minutes, so please take the time to listen. You might even get a good laugh out of some of the humor displayed. Listen to the show below. Board Competitors? VaCap,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/state-appraisal-boards-competitors-nsao-supports-hr-3619">Competitors on State Appraisal Boards</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/state-appraisal-boards-competitors-nsao-supports-hr-3619/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">22548</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highest and best use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seller concession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Mueller Report has surfaced. The report is a Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report and it was given to an appraiser as a sample. This one raises more questions than the last one! The photos from the property inspection do not tell the appraiser one thing. The photos are dark and the repairs the inspector states are needed, simply are not seen in the photos. It begs the question, does the appraiser have adequate information to complete a credible appraisal? Now take a look at the Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal report. Pull up the report and follow along. Some things have&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP">Mueller REO Hybrid Appraisal Report</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/mueller-REO-hybrid-appraisal-report-vs-USPAP/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21229</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, don’t toss your reading bifocals in the wastebasket just yet. Apparently, there were so many negative issues with the THIRD exposure draft to the 2020-21 version of USPAP, that the ASB jettisoned it, and will move forward with a FOURTH draft. Everyone should be on their toes, ready to peruse this stellar document when it is released not long from now! Can’t we, please, establish a set of reliable and understandable procedures, and leave them in place for 5 years minimum? Please! Here’s the announcement issued on February 8, 2019, after the ASB meeting in Scottsdale, AZ: (From the Appraisal Foundation)&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft">Another Draft to a USPAP Draft!</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/another-draft-2-USPAP-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20938</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appraisers Take on Washington DC</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[a la mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids were a big topic &#038; many regulators are concerned about their compliance&#8230; Independent Fee appraisers representing 15 different states were well represented in Washington DC this past weekend. Appraisers from  Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Ohio, Louisiana, California, Illinois, South Dakota, Michigan, Utah, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland and Washington State joined together in DC for several gatherings. To sum it up simply&#8230; Positive Unity among all. On Friday, three members of VaCAP attended the Appraisal Standards Board Meeting. This meeting was live streamed, so hopefully you were able to watch live. Lots of discussions on the proposed changes to the 2020-2021&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together">Appraisers Take on Washington DC</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/regulators-amcs-appraisers-working-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19637</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is&#8230; Folks, the Second Exposure Draft of proposed changes to the next USPAP was released by the Appraisal Standards Board on August 23. See embedded PDF below. The ASB is encouraging all users to review this document, and provide commentary back to them on/before October 10, 2018. One item of note is there is a proposal in the Draft to do away with specifically ‘naming’ an appraisal report as to the “type” it is. If it’s not an ‘appraisal’, what is it?? Currently we have “Appraisal Report”&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft">If It’s Not an Appraisal, What Is It?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-type-uspap-exposure-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road to Perdition</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothetical Condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like USPAP and IVS are finally going to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony. Didn’t Coca Cola already do that? It’s been awhile since I’ve harped about the International Valuation Standards (IVS) and the International Valuation Standards Council, or their inappropriate influence on USPAP. Perdition Road paving compliments of The Appraisal Foundation under sub contract to MISMO. Unnecessary Bridging from USPAP to IVS provided by TAF. For those unfamiliar with what (IVS) or who (IVSC) they are, the following link may help. Scroll down to the corporate sponsors section. THIS is who the ‘international sponsors’ are.&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS">Road to Perdition</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/TAF-unnecessary-bridging-USPAP-2-IVS/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19090</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At or During?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Towne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“At the time of assignment” refers to the time period commencing&#8230; Last month, the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) provided the ‘first draft’ of the proposed changes to the 2020-21 USPAP, which I circulated. One of the points they mentioned is a goal to make USPAP easier to read and more understandable. OK, commendable. Then on June 27, 2018, the Appraisal Foundation and the ASB released the latest USPAP Q&#38;A “suggestions.” (The USPAP Q&#38;A&#8217;s, AO&#8217;s, and FAQ&#8217;s are not directives, or even a ‘legal’ part of USPAP. Instead, they offer independent commentary on how a particular issue could be handled or solved, but may&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period">At or During?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/simplifying-USPAP-assignment-time-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18572</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Real Estate Appraiser Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=18387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately there has been a push for bifurcated (hybrid) appraisal products. Those promoting these questionable products claim it will reduce the amount of time to obtain an appraisal. Most appraisers are screaming foul play, and for good reason. It is because of bad players doing questionable things that licensing became mandatory in Virginia. Mandatory. Licensing of appraisers protects the public trust. We all know splitting the process will not save time, but rather create delays. The only reason for this questionable product is the profit of the amc, nothing more. And then there is the quality of the information being&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals">Are Bifurcated Appraisals Legal in Your State?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/questionable-bifurcated-hybrid-appraisals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18387</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
