<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NCAB - Appraisers Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal-organizations/ncab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/category/appraisal-organizations/ncab/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 06:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52046035</site>	<item>
		<title>$599 Waiver to Save the Borrower Money?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-real-cost-2-consumers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-real-cost-2-consumers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester VMS Appraisal Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoesterVMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The consumer is being fed yet another lie! Remember when we heard an appraisal waiver will save the borrower money? Do you recall all those videos from loan officers and mortgage companies encouraging borrowers to obtain an appraisal waiver to save them money? News flash – they lied! But you already knew that. Well, fellow appraiser and blogger Krystal Schware of Paragon Appraisal Services has a story for you: “The Danger of Saying Yes to an Appraisal Waiver”. &#8220;For only $599, we will grant you an appraisal waiver to help you avoid having an appraisal that &#8216;comes in short&#8217;.&#8221; **&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-real-cost-2-consumers">$599 Waiver to Save the Borrower Money?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal-waiver-real-cost-2-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21120</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjustments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Guild of Appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association of Realtors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion of value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Deposit Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zillow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The current and proposed revised version of USPAP also opens the door to increased regulatory persecution of licensed and certified real estate appraisers, while leaving all others that opine about values with no constraints, rules or limitations. I was recently asked to consider a proposed change to USPAP. As received in my email: “Also this, in the 3rd exposure draft 239 The appraiser is not required to title an appraisal report using specific terminology because 240 USPAP compliance is measured by the substantive content of a report, not by what the 241 report is called. The use of labels such as analysis,&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers">Increased Regulatory Persecution of Appraisers</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/USPAP-increased-regulatory-persecution-real-estate-appraisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20713</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coester Surety Bond Claims Exceed Value</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/coester-surety-bond-claims-exceed-value/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/coester-surety-bond-claims-exceed-value/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounts receivables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester VMS Appraisal Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoesterVMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Coester VMS Surety Bond Claims Exceed Value&#8230; Appraisers licensed in North Carolina received the following email by International Fidelity Insurance Company: Re: Principal: Coestervms Bond No.: TXIFSU0633863 Obligee: NORTH CAROLINA APPRAISAL BOARD Please be advised that International Fidelity Insurance Company (the &#8220;Surety&#8221;) issued an Appraisal Bond to CoesterVMS (&#8220;Coester&#8221;). The penal limit of the bond is $25,000.00. This letter will advise you that the Surety has received claims against the above referenced bond in excess of the bond&#8217;s penal sum. As a result, the Surety will pay claims on the bond on a pro rata basis according to the amount&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/coester-surety-bond-claims-exceed-value/">Coester Surety Bond Claims Exceed Value</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/coester-surety-bond-claims-exceed-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20341</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CoesterVMS Surety Bond Cancelled</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/coestervms-surety-bond-cancelled</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/coestervms-surety-bond-cancelled#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VaCAP Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester VMS Appraisal Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoesterVMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surety bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VaCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Coalition of Appraiser Professionals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=20256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>VaCAP has been forwarded an email from the North Carolina Appraisal Board stating the Surety Bond for Coester VMS has been cancelled. We have not heard anything from Virginia or any other state, but will update you as new developments arise. From: NCAppraisal Board ncappraisalboard@ncab.org Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 11:24 AM Subject: Bond Claims against CoesterVMS The surety bond holder for CoesterVMS, IFIC, has notified the Appraisal Board that Coester requested the bond to be cancelled. The effective date of the cancellation is February 16, 2019. The bond number is TXIFSU0633863. A scan of the original bond is attached. Note&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/coestervms-surety-bond-cancelled">CoesterVMS Surety Bond Cancelled</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/coestervms-surety-bond-cancelled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20256</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who &#8216;assists&#8217; in Hybrid Appraisals</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/3rd-party-inspector-assists-hybrids</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/3rd-party-inspector-assists-hybrids#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAREA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Valuation Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCREAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Real Estate Appraiser Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=19542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>the appraiser shall identify any person who &#34;assists&#34; in the appraisal process&#8230; NCREAA recently submitted a letter to the North Carolina Appraisal Board regarding hybrid / desktop appraisal products. As a result of this letter, which highlights concerns raised by NC Appraisers, NCAB is forming an ad hoc committee to clarify, define and provide guidance on these hybrid / desktop products with respect to current North Carolina Appraisal Laws. Read the letter below: The North Carolina Real Estate Appraiser Association (NCREAA) has recently received requests/inquiries from our members regarding guidance on assignments for “hybrid/interior desktop” appraisals requests they have recently&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/3rd-party-inspector-assists-hybrids">Who &#8216;assists&#8217; in Hybrid Appraisals</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/3rd-party-inspector-assists-hybrids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">19542</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana Makes History &#8211; C&#038;R Fee</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/first-enforcement-of-cr-fee-provision-louisiana-makes-history/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/first-enforcement-of-cr-fee-provision-louisiana-makes-history/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac Peck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1073]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coester VMS Appraisal Management Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoesterVMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LREAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>First Enforcement of C&#038;R Fee Provision: Louisiana Makes History Nearly five years after Dodd-Frank set forth rules regarding Customary &#38; Reasonable fees (C&#38;R) for appraisers, an agreement last week between a state board and an Appraisal Management Company (AMC) is the first evidence of enforcement. The bottom line for appraisers is that they may be finally on their way back to customary and reasonable fees. On June 4, 2015, the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board (LREAB) issued a Stipulations and Order Memorandum (SOM) wherein Coester Appraisal Management Group, also known as Coester VMS, offers no admission of guilt but agrees&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/first-enforcement-of-cr-fee-provision-louisiana-makes-history/">Louisiana Makes History &#8211; C&#038;R Fee</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/first-enforcement-of-cr-fee-provision-louisiana-makes-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7964</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blacklisting Lawsuit Continues</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/blacklisting-lawsuit-continues/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/blacklisting-lawsuit-continues/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac Peck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approved list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael McSwain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StreetLinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yadkin Valley Bank]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Appraiser Michael J. McSwain filed a lawsuit against Yadkin Valley Bank and the appraisal management company (AMC) StreetLinks Lender Solutions, alleging that he was retaliated against for failing to reach targeted values. </p>
<p>According to the suit, McSwain performed two appraisals for StreetLinks in late 2012, on behalf of Yadkin Valley Bank, both of which failed to “meet value.” The suit cites explicit emails from the branch manager at Yadkin which state: </p>
<p>“StreetLinks has sent out a BUTCHER on two of my last refis [sic] … make sure he is not sent out in our county and make sure he is not on the approval list…I thought I would let him do these two just to see. NOW THE DEALS ARE DEAD.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/blacklisting-lawsuit-continues/">Blacklisting Lawsuit Continues</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/blacklisting-lawsuit-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7629</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NC Proposed Law RE R&#038;C Appraisal Fees</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/north-carolina-proposed-law-would-address-reasonable-and-customary-appraisal-fees/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/north-carolina-proposed-law-would-address-reasonable-and-customary-appraisal-fees/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Management Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C&R Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customary & Reasonable Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Outlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mel Black Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NC Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&C Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable & Customary Fees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=7344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>North Carolina Proposed Law Would Address Reasonable and Customary Appraisal Fees North Carolina’s House Bill 577, introduced April 2, 2015, would seek to address reasonable and customary appraisal fees. Some of the proposals in the Bill would: Require the NC Appraisal Board to publish a “schedule of customary and reasonable rates of compensation for appraisals based on the market area where the real property is situated.” Establish rates by fee studies that would exclude assignments ordered by known appraisal management companies. Require rates to be “measured by the net compensation amount received by the appraiser.” Allow for payments above the&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/north-carolina-proposed-law-would-address-reasonable-and-customary-appraisal-fees/">NC Proposed Law RE R&#038;C Appraisal Fees</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/north-carolina-proposed-law-would-address-reasonable-and-customary-appraisal-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7344</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharing Report with Fellow Appraisers a USPAP Violation?</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignment results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Appraisal Standards Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Sharing a Report with a Fellow Appraiser a Violation of USPAP Confidentiality?&#8230;Appraisers routinely share confidential information &#38; communicate assignment results with other appraisers&#8230; Appraisers frequently are faced with chances to make mistakes related to confidentiality. The Confidentiality Section of the ETHICS RULE of Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), as published by the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) of the Appraisal Foundation and enforced by the North Carolina Appraisal Board, provides the rules for appraisers in North Carolina. Appraisers often are reminded about and advised how to avoid the pitfalls of communicating with property owners, real estate brokers, lenders&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/">Sharing Report with Fellow Appraisers a USPAP Violation?</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/is-sharing-a-report-with-a-fellow-appraiser-a-violation-of-uspap-confidentiality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6075</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knowing When to Say NO</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/knowing-when-to-say-no/</link>
					<comments>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/knowing-when-to-say-no/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppraisersBlogs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisal Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appraisers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Appraisal Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparable sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope of work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unacceptable assignment condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=5206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I wish I never took that assignment One comment often encountered when investigating a complaint is “I wish I never took that assignment”. Another is “I should have walked away when I saw the property.” How can you avoid that uneasy feeling when completing an assignment? If this is a typical residential mortgage transaction, things may go fairly smoothly. If the assignment involves appraising a property in a divorce, estate, tax appeal, or anything that might end up in litigation, you should meet with your client to assess whether there could be trouble ahead. One way to avoid this type of surprise is to not consider assignments as being routine. Each assignment regardless of purpose or intent has&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/knowing-when-to-say-no/">Knowing When to Say NO</a> appeared on <a href="https://appraisersblogs.com">Appraisers Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/knowing-when-to-say-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5206</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
