<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More than Half of Appraisers Responded They Would Get Out of Appraising	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/more-than-half-of-appraisers-responded-they-would-get-out-of-appraising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/more-than-half-of-appraisers-responded-they-would-get-out-of-appraising/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, CA AG, SCREA, AGA, GAA, RAA		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/more-than-half-of-appraisers-responded-they-would-get-out-of-appraising/#comment-11968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, CA AG, SCREA, AGA, GAA, RAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3325#comment-11968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m usually the counter-point to my curmudgeonly amigos, &quot;RA&quot; and Baggins above, but not this time. &quot;Wanting&quot; to stick with appraising regardless of legislation is not the same as saying we are happy or even accepting of the current state of affairs.

An AMC friend told me he cannot get anyone in Texas to accept $450 fees for non complex FNMA conforming loan limits right now. He also said that in Alaska, he cant get any appraisers interested for less than $800 and three weeks turn time. That does NOT mean business is good! All it really means is that of those that have not yet dropped out completely; many have refocused their appraisal into non (loan) production assignments. In the very short term it is going to be a minor windfall for some few appraisers. In the long run it means one of two things MUST happen in an extremely short time span:

(1). Banks will have to become more realistic about &quot;reasonable&quot; costs and less greedy about what they pay AMCs as purported &#039;customary&#039; fees.

(2). AMCs themselves will have to settle in to less competitive, more moderate fixed rates for there services---just as they have expected appraisers to do for the past six years. It is the ruinous price competition among AMCs that results in appraiser fees being pushed down. Just as appraisers need a certain compensation or the work suffers, so do AMCs. Banks have passed through (abdicated) their oversight responsibilities to AMCs. If they want cursory &quot;reviews&quot; (quick read overs); then pay $75 fee. If they want meaningful USPAP compliance reviews than $150 to $250+- will have to become the norm.

Study history. Economic principles can be short cut; side tracked, obfuscated and even lied about for a LIMITED period of time. We&#039;ve about reached that limit. Supply and demand vs quality and price parameters have been stretched to the limits...and then some.

The FACT that lenders are only making QM loans that can be sold to GSEs, rather than making portfolio loans shows that they KNOW they cant lend their own money safely.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m usually the counter-point to my curmudgeonly amigos, &#8220;RA&#8221; and Baggins above, but not this time. &#8220;Wanting&#8221; to stick with appraising regardless of legislation is not the same as saying we are happy or even accepting of the current state of affairs.</p>
<p>An AMC friend told me he cannot get anyone in Texas to accept $450 fees for non complex FNMA conforming loan limits right now. He also said that in Alaska, he cant get any appraisers interested for less than $800 and three weeks turn time. That does NOT mean business is good! All it really means is that of those that have not yet dropped out completely; many have refocused their appraisal into non (loan) production assignments. In the very short term it is going to be a minor windfall for some few appraisers. In the long run it means one of two things MUST happen in an extremely short time span:</p>
<p>(1). Banks will have to become more realistic about &#8220;reasonable&#8221; costs and less greedy about what they pay AMCs as purported &#8216;customary&#8217; fees.</p>
<p>(2). AMCs themselves will have to settle in to less competitive, more moderate fixed rates for there services&#8212;just as they have expected appraisers to do for the past six years. It is the ruinous price competition among AMCs that results in appraiser fees being pushed down. Just as appraisers need a certain compensation or the work suffers, so do AMCs. Banks have passed through (abdicated) their oversight responsibilities to AMCs. If they want cursory &#8220;reviews&#8221; (quick read overs); then pay $75 fee. If they want meaningful USPAP compliance reviews than $150 to $250+- will have to become the norm.</p>
<p>Study history. Economic principles can be short cut; side tracked, obfuscated and even lied about for a LIMITED period of time. We&#8217;ve about reached that limit. Supply and demand vs quality and price parameters have been stretched to the limits&#8230;and then some.</p>
<p>The FACT that lenders are only making QM loans that can be sold to GSEs, rather than making portfolio loans shows that they KNOW they cant lend their own money safely.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11968" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/more-than-half-of-appraisers-responded-they-would-get-out-of-appraising/#comment-7387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3325#comment-7387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An interesting article.  Slash every positive report by half because well more than half of the appraiser populace was not represented in this poll.  AP draws in a lot of discounted fee clients.  So many an appraiser who already refused such engagements did not log on to AP that week, or even in the same year, for that matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article.  Slash every positive report by half because well more than half of the appraiser populace was not represented in this poll.  AP draws in a lot of discounted fee clients.  So many an appraiser who already refused such engagements did not log on to AP that week, or even in the same year, for that matter.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="7387" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Retired Appraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/more-than-half-of-appraisers-responded-they-would-get-out-of-appraising/#comment-7377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Retired Appraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=3325#comment-7377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That 1/3 that you speak of should adequately reprensent the ding dong clan who are just thrilled to be newly licensed and rid of their jobs at McDonalds.  Give them another year to go through their credit and home equity and they should wise up as well.

You already know what the response would have been from the tens of thousands of experienced appraisers who bailed out early on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 1/3 that you speak of should adequately reprensent the ding dong clan who are just thrilled to be newly licensed and rid of their jobs at McDonalds.  Give them another year to go through their credit and home equity and they should wise up as well.</p>
<p>You already know what the response would have been from the tens of thousands of experienced appraisers who bailed out early on.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="7377" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
