<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Like Type Properties	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/like-type-properties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/like-type-properties/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/like-type-properties/#comment-11253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6368#comment-11253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good article.  I&#039;ve been arguing with a few appraisers lately regarding the merits of market caps via unit of value measurements.  It&#039;s the utilization of automated tools that bring about much of the discrepancies from price to value.  I&#039;m not a big supporter of automatic valuation methods, because I don&#039;t think trending should always be applied in a forward manner in the grid, as appraisers should be recognizing current market caps for unit of value measurements.  This scenario sounds like one where the cost approach may have been utilized, and would have indicated a cost to build figure which may have been higher than the market value approach which capped valuation via existing market unit of measurements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  I&#8217;ve been arguing with a few appraisers lately regarding the merits of market caps via unit of value measurements.  It&#8217;s the utilization of automated tools that bring about much of the discrepancies from price to value.  I&#8217;m not a big supporter of automatic valuation methods, because I don&#8217;t think trending should always be applied in a forward manner in the grid, as appraisers should be recognizing current market caps for unit of value measurements.  This scenario sounds like one where the cost approach may have been utilized, and would have indicated a cost to build figure which may have been higher than the market value approach which capped valuation via existing market unit of measurements.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11253" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
