<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ASB Letter to FHFA Regarding Uniform Appraisal Dataset	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-standards-board-letter-to-federal-housing-finance-agency-regarding-uad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-standards-board-letter-to-federal-housing-finance-agency-regarding-uad/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NJAppraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-standards-board-letter-to-federal-housing-finance-agency-regarding-uad/#comment-83</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NJAppraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=472#comment-83</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do a lot of REOs and most of the time don&#039;t have any information on updates if any. There needs to be the option for &quot;N/A or unknown&quot; when this information is not available! I don&#039;t believe that the implementation of UAD is to bring about more consistent appraisal reporting. Appraisers are well aware that this is for data mining. This is a push to make appraisals more like AVMs. Next we will have standardized adjustments? It looks like the end of the appraisal profession is near! Welcome to a form filling desk job :(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do a lot of REOs and most of the time don&#8217;t have any information on updates if any. There needs to be the option for &#8220;N/A or unknown&#8221; when this information is not available! I don&#8217;t believe that the implementation of UAD is to bring about more consistent appraisal reporting. Appraisers are well aware that this is for data mining. This is a push to make appraisals more like AVMs. Next we will have standardized adjustments? It looks like the end of the appraisal profession is near! Welcome to a form filling desk job 🙁</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="83" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BillM		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/fannie-mae-freddie-mac/appraisal-standards-board-letter-to-federal-housing-finance-agency-regarding-uad/#comment-81</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BillM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=472#comment-81</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well done ASB!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done ASB!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="81" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
