<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CU &#8220;Enhancements&#8221; Are Coming	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:15:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, CA AG, SCREA, AGA, GAA, RAA		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comment-12496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, CA AG, SCREA, AGA, GAA, RAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547#comment-12496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FINISHED!

Fellow appraisers, please visit http://mfford.com/html/c___r_fees.htm

Apologies for using my personal site but logistical and time constraints made it necessary.

It is to read a draft proposal for minimum national appraiser fees. I appreciate some believe no one other than themselves should set fees, and I concur. Except, in the real world of today where someone (lenders and AMCs) are ALREADY SETTING your fees. If not directly, then through ruinous less than customary OR reasonable fee competition.

Im interested in your meaningful, &lt;em&gt;constructive&lt;/em&gt; feedback as well as comment &#038; discussion here.

For those that insist ONLY regional fees are practical, this same system works for the lowest to highest regions of America. Subtract 13% for low cost areas; add up to 9%+- for higher cost areas.

Operating premises were:

1. AMCs are here to stay. Liked or hated, they are part of the chain now.

2. LENDERS want AMCs to offer one size fits all pricing. This MAY come close to doing so baring complex assignments. Even there, an inferred hourly equivalent is suggested.

3. If WE don&#039;t set &quot;reasonable&quot; minimums for ourselves, then others will do it for us (or to us).

4. Framework allows for and includes inducements for trainees or less than certified appraisers-who have been largely excluded or ignored by AMCs in recent years.

In addition to posting here, PLEASE also email comments to JanBellas@appraisersguild.org

We are going to start reaching out to state coalitions and other appraiser peers groups. We hope to incorporate helpful comments or views in that effort. In the meantime our parent union is already being contacted to see how we can best proceed.

Thank you for taking the time to read and respond. Mike Ford, AGA; OPEIU/AFL-CIO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINISHED!</p>
<p>Fellow appraisers, please visit <a target="_blank" href="http://mfford.com/html/c___r_fees.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://mfford.com/html/c___r_fees.htm</a></p>
<p>Apologies for using my personal site but logistical and time constraints made it necessary.</p>
<p>It is to read a draft proposal for minimum national appraiser fees. I appreciate some believe no one other than themselves should set fees, and I concur. Except, in the real world of today where someone (lenders and AMCs) are ALREADY SETTING your fees. If not directly, then through ruinous less than customary OR reasonable fee competition.</p>
<p>Im interested in your meaningful, <em>constructive</em> feedback as well as comment &amp; discussion here.</p>
<p>For those that insist ONLY regional fees are practical, this same system works for the lowest to highest regions of America. Subtract 13% for low cost areas; add up to 9%+- for higher cost areas.</p>
<p>Operating premises were:</p>
<p>1. AMCs are here to stay. Liked or hated, they are part of the chain now.</p>
<p>2. LENDERS want AMCs to offer one size fits all pricing. This MAY come close to doing so baring complex assignments. Even there, an inferred hourly equivalent is suggested.</p>
<p>3. If WE don&#8217;t set &#8220;reasonable&#8221; minimums for ourselves, then others will do it for us (or to us).</p>
<p>4. Framework allows for and includes inducements for trainees or less than certified appraisers-who have been largely excluded or ignored by AMCs in recent years.</p>
<p>In addition to posting here, PLEASE also email comments to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:JanBellas@appraisersguild.org">JanBellas@appraisersguild.org</a></p>
<p>We are going to start reaching out to state coalitions and other appraiser peers groups. We hope to incorporate helpful comments or views in that effort. In the meantime our parent union is already being contacted to see how we can best proceed.</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to read and respond. Mike Ford, AGA; OPEIU/AFL-CIO</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="12496" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ralph Kramden		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comment-12247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Kramden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547#comment-12247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As an appraiser, FNMA has always been a joy to work with  &lt;strong&gt;(not !).  &lt;/strong&gt;I stopped working with them, but now I see that *everyone* will have the opportunity to to enjoy their arrogant behaviors.  IMNSHO, they will not be happy until they eliminate what they call The Gold Standard, AKA *The Appraiser* from the appraisal equation, replacing any human element with statistical analysis&lt;strong&gt;.  &lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Resistance is futile, You will be assimilated&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

&#160;
horse ship
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an appraiser, FNMA has always been a joy to work with  <strong>(not !).  </strong>I stopped working with them, but now I see that *everyone* will have the opportunity to to enjoy their arrogant behaviors.  IMNSHO, they will not be happy until they eliminate what they call The Gold Standard, AKA *The Appraiser* from the appraisal equation, replacing any human element with statistical analysis<strong>.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Resistance is futile, You will be assimilated&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
horse ship</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="12247" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comment-12208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547#comment-12208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In regards to Fannie Mae updating the CU platform, I say your welcome. An appraisal report has a specific client (a single lender) but big brother government steals the data from our reports to use against us without compensation. If a public company had exclusive use of all this appraisal data, its shareholders would be rewarded with a multi billion dollar evaluation. The fact that lenders will now have a CU report back in 10 minutes while the appraisers will still have no data available to them, is a joke. The fact that appraisals and appraisers get scored on a 1 - 5 scale by this system, but the scoring matric has never been presented to us, is a scam. Think employee review where your company doesn&#039;t disclose how your performance is calculated and doesn&#039;t even let you review your work file. WHAT! When experienced appraisers take on the complex assignments where value is supported but may be at the high limits of the neighborhood, why should we take the risk and liability when a negative higher score will be the norm? With TRID implementation looming and the unlikely higher pay for more complex assignments, why would I complete a complex property most likely to get a CU score of 2.5 to 3, when I can get paid the same on a non-complex property and receive a score of 1 to 1.5? When lenders turn down requests for higher complexity fees on complex properties, do they not understand the youngest and greenest of the bunch will then complete the work? If I go to my doctor, lawyer, mechanic, etc. and they explain a complex issue, what rational would I have to then go to someone less experienced?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to Fannie Mae updating the CU platform, I say your welcome. An appraisal report has a specific client (a single lender) but big brother government steals the data from our reports to use against us without compensation. If a public company had exclusive use of all this appraisal data, its shareholders would be rewarded with a multi billion dollar evaluation. The fact that lenders will now have a CU report back in 10 minutes while the appraisers will still have no data available to them, is a joke. The fact that appraisals and appraisers get scored on a 1 &#8211; 5 scale by this system, but the scoring matric has never been presented to us, is a scam. Think employee review where your company doesn&#8217;t disclose how your performance is calculated and doesn&#8217;t even let you review your work file. WHAT! When experienced appraisers take on the complex assignments where value is supported but may be at the high limits of the neighborhood, why should we take the risk and liability when a negative higher score will be the norm? With TRID implementation looming and the unlikely higher pay for more complex assignments, why would I complete a complex property most likely to get a CU score of 2.5 to 3, when I can get paid the same on a non-complex property and receive a score of 1 to 1.5? When lenders turn down requests for higher complexity fees on complex properties, do they not understand the youngest and greenest of the bunch will then complete the work? If I go to my doctor, lawyer, mechanic, etc. and they explain a complex issue, what rational would I have to then go to someone less experienced?</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="12208" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Retired Appraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/enhancements-to-cu-are-coming/#comment-12170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Retired Appraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=8547#comment-12170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would you care for another serving of horse ship appraisers?  You look famished.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you care for another serving of horse ship appraisers?  You look famished.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="12170" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
