<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Appraisal Bullying, Still Going Strong!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford CA AG, SCREA, GAA, RAA		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-12215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford CA AG, SCREA, GAA, RAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 01:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-12215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Baggins, I think you&#039;ve won me over (mostly). I don&#039;t like flat fees for us anymore than I like them for AMCs from banks ($495) nationally. Having said that; IF we set up a multi tiered pricing system, it could work. $650 for a non complex, FNMA conforming loan limit SFR; $850 if &quot;complex&quot;  and $1,000 IF the proposed transaction amount requires a certified residential appraiser OR the AMCs policies make that a requirement (we&#039;ll see a LOT more work open up for licensees this way). Anything over 1.5 goes up $500 for each increment of $500,000 ESTIMATED value over 1.5. presuming that the degree of difficulty USUALLY increases among higher priced housing (better than the current assumption which holds they are the same as a $200,000 house in terms of complexity).

The numbers may vary, but if the result is something that approximates equivalent federal pay scales for appraisers, them Im ok with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baggins, I think you&#8217;ve won me over (mostly). I don&#8217;t like flat fees for us anymore than I like them for AMCs from banks ($495) nationally. Having said that; IF we set up a multi tiered pricing system, it could work. $650 for a non complex, FNMA conforming loan limit SFR; $850 if &#8220;complex&#8221;  and $1,000 IF the proposed transaction amount requires a certified residential appraiser OR the AMCs policies make that a requirement (we&#8217;ll see a LOT more work open up for licensees this way). Anything over 1.5 goes up $500 for each increment of $500,000 ESTIMATED value over 1.5. presuming that the degree of difficulty USUALLY increases among higher priced housing (better than the current assumption which holds they are the same as a $200,000 house in terms of complexity).</p>
<p>The numbers may vary, but if the result is something that approximates equivalent federal pay scales for appraisers, them Im ok with it.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="12215" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doctor Manhattan		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doctor Manhattan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-11339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Appraisers need to straighten themselves out and realize that they should be thanking the AMCs every day for cleaning up all of those error filled nonsensical appraisal reports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appraisers need to straighten themselves out and realize that they should be thanking the AMCs every day for cleaning up all of those error filled nonsensical appraisal reports.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11339" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Retired Appraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Retired Appraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-11285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11274&quot;&gt;Donna Corrado on Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.

They chose a more crafty way of seeking a higher number with us.  After spending three days on an incredibly tough assignment we were hit with a list of some 35 comparable sales the next day from the AMC.  The note simply stated please evaluate each of these comparable sales with regard to your appraisal and submit comments about why each one was not used in your appraisal.

We evaluated them promptly by copying their idiotic request and submitting it to the proper authorities with the statement claiming that it was an attempt at change the final value of the property.  

The AMC refused to pay us for the assignment at that point and we then sued then in court winning twice the original cost of the appraisal.  Thankfully that AMC went out of business within the year.  I am now thankful for that particular assignment because it provided me with a glimpse of the future of appraising.  We closed our doors within months and headed for fields of gold, leaving the fields of rust to younger lesser inexperienced appraisers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11274">Donna Corrado on Facebook</a>.</p>
<p>They chose a more crafty way of seeking a higher number with us.  After spending three days on an incredibly tough assignment we were hit with a list of some 35 comparable sales the next day from the AMC.  The note simply stated please evaluate each of these comparable sales with regard to your appraisal and submit comments about why each one was not used in your appraisal.</p>
<p>We evaluated them promptly by copying their idiotic request and submitting it to the proper authorities with the statement claiming that it was an attempt at change the final value of the property.  </p>
<p>The AMC refused to pay us for the assignment at that point and we then sued then in court winning twice the original cost of the appraisal.  Thankfully that AMC went out of business within the year.  I am now thankful for that particular assignment because it provided me with a glimpse of the future of appraising.  We closed our doors within months and headed for fields of gold, leaving the fields of rust to younger lesser inexperienced appraisers.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11285" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-11278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But the article on this same website just before this, told me that 95% of all appraisals should come in at purchase price, almost as a defacto standard.  LOL! /  Great article here.  Illustrating the process of backwards rewards and that rewarding advocacy is still present.  Want accountability?  Originators and salespersons must be held accountable.   Absent of fines based on income, citizen and governmental enforcement simply cannot afford to prosecute.  That or eliminate the secondary government avenues for loan packaging and resale.  Skin in the game and such needs to be 100% and no less.  As neither of those are really feasible at the moment, I&#039;ll continue to argue for mandated rotational distribution panels, uniform fees for all appraisers on panel, and equalization of the distribution process.  The root of all evil when it comes to appraisal distribution, is the art of preferential assignment.  If you&#039;re an advocacy minded appraiser, you will get more work than the next guy.  That simply should not be a permissible action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the article on this same website just before this, told me that 95% of all appraisals should come in at purchase price, almost as a defacto standard.  LOL! /  Great article here.  Illustrating the process of backwards rewards and that rewarding advocacy is still present.  Want accountability?  Originators and salespersons must be held accountable.   Absent of fines based on income, citizen and governmental enforcement simply cannot afford to prosecute.  That or eliminate the secondary government avenues for loan packaging and resale.  Skin in the game and such needs to be 100% and no less.  As neither of those are really feasible at the moment, I&#8217;ll continue to argue for mandated rotational distribution panels, uniform fees for all appraisers on panel, and equalization of the distribution process.  The root of all evil when it comes to appraisal distribution, is the art of preferential assignment.  If you&#8217;re an advocacy minded appraiser, you will get more work than the next guy.  That simply should not be a permissible action.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11278" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Annemieke Roell Hamilton		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annemieke Roell Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-11275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An Opinion of Value below the Contract price will result in a (or more) Reconsiderations of Value, insults by the realtor and, in many cases, a frivolous complaint filed to the Appraisal Board. We are held to extremely high standards but are fought every step of the way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Opinion of Value below the Contract price will result in a (or more) Reconsiderations of Value, insults by the realtor and, in many cases, a frivolous complaint filed to the Appraisal Board. We are held to extremely high standards but are fought every step of the way.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11275" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donna Corrado on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/appraisal-bullying-still-going-strong/#comment-11274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna Corrado on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=6487#comment-11274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t bring a property into value, you will see a revision request, wanting an explanation why? And you will not see another order either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t bring a property into value, you will see a revision request, wanting an explanation why? And you will not see another order either.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="11274" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
