<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 20 Reasons Appraisers Should Get Paid Full Fee	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/20-reasons-appraisers-should-get-paid-full-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/20-reasons-appraisers-should-get-paid-full-fee/</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/20-reasons-appraisers-should-get-paid-full-fee/#comment-6471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2863#comment-6471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s about time someone in the AMC industry came to their senses.  Thank you Mr Schurman for putting forth this paper.  Now if only the amc&#039;s would listen.

This paper is my new mandatory attachment when I communicate with hopeful amc clients.  Of course they are not going to pay me full fee and operate on a cost plus system until the lenders force them to do so.  Even then, I doubt I&#039;ll be put back on all the amc lists I&#039;ve been kicked off of for arguing the exact same full fee position as this paper presents.  I&#039;ve been removed from more amc panels for requesting full fee, than the total number of full fee orders all amcs as a group have sent me.  Consider those ratios in the future, when there are no new appraisers in this business.

Sadly though, an appraiser still cannot get a fair share of work orders from most amc&#039;s, unless the appraiser provides the amc more profit via discounted appraisal fee.

If that&#039;s not giving a thing of value to attain disproportionate share of work orders, I don&#039;t know what is.  

A dollar short and a day late, to be sure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time someone in the AMC industry came to their senses.  Thank you Mr Schurman for putting forth this paper.  Now if only the amc&#8217;s would listen.</p>
<p>This paper is my new mandatory attachment when I communicate with hopeful amc clients.  Of course they are not going to pay me full fee and operate on a cost plus system until the lenders force them to do so.  Even then, I doubt I&#8217;ll be put back on all the amc lists I&#8217;ve been kicked off of for arguing the exact same full fee position as this paper presents.  I&#8217;ve been removed from more amc panels for requesting full fee, than the total number of full fee orders all amcs as a group have sent me.  Consider those ratios in the future, when there are no new appraisers in this business.</p>
<p>Sadly though, an appraiser still cannot get a fair share of work orders from most amc&#8217;s, unless the appraiser provides the amc more profit via discounted appraisal fee.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not giving a thing of value to attain disproportionate share of work orders, I don&#8217;t know what is.  </p>
<p>A dollar short and a day late, to be sure.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="6471" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ex Kentucky Appraiser		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/20-reasons-appraisers-should-get-paid-full-fee/#comment-6470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ex Kentucky Appraiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2863#comment-6470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ONE REASON WHY APPRAISERS WON&#039;T BE PAID HIGHER FEES:

They are a group of LAZY ignorant azzez that refuse to organize!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONE REASON WHY APPRAISERS WON&#8217;T BE PAID HIGHER FEES:</p>
<p>They are a group of LAZY ignorant azzez that refuse to organize!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="6470" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Noble Appraiser Inc. via Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/appraisal/20-reasons-appraisers-should-get-paid-full-fee/#comment-6468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noble Appraiser Inc. via Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=2863#comment-6468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to Rick, the paper is meant to benefit the AMCs which makes perfect sense. Taking money out of the equation is a great place to start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Rick, the paper is meant to benefit the AMCs which makes perfect sense. Taking money out of the equation is a great place to start.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="6468" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
