<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Working Paper Credibility Questioned	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 05:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-22994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-22994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.appraisalinstitute.org/ano/bill-to-repeal-gses-introduced-appraisal-institute-reviewing-proposal-/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bill to Repeal GSEs Introduced; Appraisal Institute Reviewing Proposal&lt;/a&gt;

The above is Appraisal Institute news on bill to repeal gse&#039;s, and hand over duty and data to a different entity.

Related in a round about way, and watching the committee hearing. Starts at a few minutes after 20 minute mark.

Imagine someone else having the CU data...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.appraisalinstitute.org/ano/bill-to-repeal-gses-introduced-appraisal-institute-reviewing-proposal-/" rel="nofollow">Bill to Repeal GSEs Introduced; Appraisal Institute Reviewing Proposal</a></p>
<p>The above is Appraisal Institute news on bill to repeal gse&#8217;s, and hand over duty and data to a different entity.</p>
<p>Related in a round about way, and watching the committee hearing. Starts at a few minutes after 20 minute mark.</p>
<p>Imagine someone else having the CU data&#8230;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="22994" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-21008</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-21008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20925&quot;&gt;Eric Kennedy&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Eric &lt;em&gt;if there were one single solution that would be it&lt;/em&gt;. C&#038;R fees that are meaningful. For ALL that an appraiser is expected to do I content that the &lt;em&gt;minimum&lt;/em&gt; C&#038;R fee nationally falls within a range of $900 to $1,100 for non-complex conforming fnma transactions. I reiterate the C&#038;R fees AGA first drafted and submitted almost three years ago (add whatever Federal Civil Service COLA is from then to now 3%-6%+-).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Appraisers would rather shout &#8220;No one can tell me how much I should charge,&#8221; while ignoring the destruction of our profession in the interim. Have to wonder how many of those own or are employed as high paid managers/ advisors at AMCs.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20925">Eric Kennedy</a>.</p>
<p>Eric <em>if there were one single solution that would be it</em>. C&amp;R fees that are meaningful. For ALL that an appraiser is expected to do I content that the <em>minimum</em> C&amp;R fee nationally falls within a range of $900 to $1,100 for non-complex conforming fnma transactions. I reiterate the C&amp;R fees AGA first drafted and submitted almost three years ago (add whatever Federal Civil Service COLA is from then to now 3%-6%+-).</p>
<p>Appraisers would rather shout &#8220;No one can tell me how much I should charge,&#8221; while ignoring the destruction of our profession in the interim. Have to wonder how many of those own or are employed as high paid managers/ advisors at AMCs.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="21008" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marion		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-21001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 10:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-21001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Mike, excellent work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mike, excellent work</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="21001" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 04:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Bob.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bob.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20998" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Miller		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mike

Excellent work.

I totally agree that the only persons who could review the work, should be experienced licensed certified and general appraisers.

We all know this took a great deal of time and I think we all appreciate your time and effort.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p>Excellent work.</p>
<p>I totally agree that the only persons who could review the work, should be experienced licensed certified and general appraisers.</p>
<p>We all know this took a great deal of time and I think we all appreciate your time and effort.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20959" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Overnight experts, good one. Clerks with badges I suppose.

In everyday mortgage origination practice, I&#039;m often &#039;managed&#039; by people whom do not understand what my function is. They are unable to observe or understand, through report reading, review, detailed appraisal language and process specific conversations, what I am bringing to the table in terms of skill and process compliance. They have never been in the field of real estate, yet sit in the chair portending to manage licensed appraisers, all the time rarely actually reading the appraisers reports. Whipping me into shape, taking too long, charging too much. You&#039;re off of the peer model, correct or explain. I&#039;m talking to the wall when I try to explain it most times. Every single person reviewing, distributing, managing appraisers and appraisals, should have an appraisers license.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overnight experts, good one. Clerks with badges I suppose.</p>
<p>In everyday mortgage origination practice, I&#8217;m often &#8216;managed&#8217; by people whom do not understand what my function is. They are unable to observe or understand, through report reading, review, detailed appraisal language and process specific conversations, what I am bringing to the table in terms of skill and process compliance. They have never been in the field of real estate, yet sit in the chair portending to manage licensed appraisers, all the time rarely actually reading the appraisers reports. Whipping me into shape, taking too long, charging too much. You&#8217;re off of the peer model, correct or explain. I&#8217;m talking to the wall when I try to explain it most times. Every single person reviewing, distributing, managing appraisers and appraisals, should have an appraisers license.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20926" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Kennedy		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It drives me wild that they ALL refuse to address the elephant in the room that will fix ALL their problems. PAY the Appraiser and STOP wasting our time. In 2007 we had too many Appraisers - because they were getting paid and NOT being OverManaged. Idgits - ALL of em.

&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It drives me wild that they ALL refuse to address the elephant in the room that will fix ALL their problems. PAY the Appraiser and STOP wasting our time. In 2007 we had too many Appraisers &#8211; because they were getting paid and NOT being OverManaged. Idgits &#8211; ALL of em.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20925" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sure, they&#039;ll get right on it....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, they&#8217;ll get right on it&#8230;.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20924" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Xpert		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xpert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent work Mike!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work Mike!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20922" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kimberly Pugh DeFilippis on Facebook		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/FHFA-working-paper-credibility-questioned/#comment-20921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimberly Pugh DeFilippis on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appraisersblogs.com/?p=17871#comment-20921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BRAVO!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRAVO!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="20921" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
