<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Restricted Appraisal Reports Consumer Alert	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals</link>
	<description>Appraisal News and Tips for Real Estate Appraisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 03:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: don		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-28711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28696&quot;&gt;Mike Ford, American Guild of Appraisers (AGA™)&lt;/a&gt;.

YES, Believable appraisers write a convincing H&#038;B section in the report which (should) defend the writer. The independent contractor has to defend his net worth, insurance may not cover. The employee has fewer choices, but fewer consequences Doing E.R.C. and working against another appraiser was enlightening. When opinions differed greatly the usual situation was H&#038;B interpretations. The walkout basement, Excess land separately salable, Proximity to bad stuff, The contribution of the MIL hse, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28696">Mike Ford, American Guild of Appraisers (AGA™)</a>.</p>
<p>YES, Believable appraisers write a convincing H&amp;B section in the report which (should) defend the writer. The independent contractor has to defend his net worth, insurance may not cover. The employee has fewer choices, but fewer consequences Doing E.R.C. and working against another appraiser was enlightening. When opinions differed greatly the usual situation was H&amp;B interpretations. The walkout basement, Excess land separately salable, Proximity to bad stuff, The contribution of the MIL hse, etc.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="28711" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, American Guild of Appraisers (AGA™)		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, American Guild of Appraisers (AGA™)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-28696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28692&quot;&gt;don&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Don, as we both know all assumptions (extraordinary or otherwise) are supposed to have a reasonable basis for being made. It is that subjective ambiguity that causes the problems. Skippy will &#039;assume&#039; clearly bootlegged units are permitted and &#039;good appraiser will ask for permits.

Not sure where you were going with the rest of distinctions re ICs vs employees. Any licensed &#039;employee&#039; can be held accountable by the state whether IC or employee. Same as any doctor could be. There may be other civil liabilities beyond license regulatory agencies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28692">don</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Don, as we both know all assumptions (extraordinary or otherwise) are supposed to have a reasonable basis for being made. It is that subjective ambiguity that causes the problems. Skippy will &#8216;assume&#8217; clearly bootlegged units are permitted and &#8216;good appraiser will ask for permits.</p>
<p>Not sure where you were going with the rest of distinctions re ICs vs employees. Any licensed &#8217;employee&#8217; can be held accountable by the state whether IC or employee. Same as any doctor could be. There may be other civil liabilities beyond license regulatory agencies.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="28696" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: don		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-28692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-28692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What of the certified appraiser who make unverified assumptions recklessly. What does the appraisal FEE have tooooo  dooo with the work spelled out in the contract, what of the liability incurred by using the clients criteria???

Appraisers are either licensed contractors with the ability do CLEARLY state their job, or employees who are bound to their employers demands. Are appraisers licensees violations JUST enforced by the STATE or The State and other appraisers?

Contractors MUST keep the rights to make a beneficial contract with their clients. Employers can demand almost anything and then fire the employee Licensed contractors have liability from many directions, employees can only be fired!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What of the certified appraiser who make unverified assumptions recklessly. What does the appraisal FEE have tooooo  dooo with the work spelled out in the contract, what of the liability incurred by using the clients criteria???</p>
<p>Appraisers are either licensed contractors with the ability do CLEARLY state their job, or employees who are bound to their employers demands. Are appraisers licensees violations JUST enforced by the STATE or The State and other appraisers?</p>
<p>Contractors MUST keep the rights to make a beneficial contract with their clients. Employers can demand almost anything and then fire the employee Licensed contractors have liability from many directions, employees can only be fired!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="28692" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mdwnlk		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-26211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdwnlk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-26211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AI are sell-out a**holes, plain and simple]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI are sell-out a**holes, plain and simple</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="26211" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-26192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-26192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-26191&quot;&gt;Vicki Grant&lt;/a&gt;.

We all get them. Or at least used to, before we had sense enough to jump off those amc panel lists. Amc is telecom out of the box, they&#039;re all the same. The appraiser is their customer, they could not exist without the appraiser, and the marketing line is always the same. If we&#039;re going to support amc&#039;s, all we ask is they do a better job than we would do, in terms of advocating on our behalf and helping us get a better deal than we would otherwise have in their absence. Who actually selects an agent from a middle management agency whom purposefully drives workload up and fees down?  

That&#039;s a tough sale... That&#039;s why the dress it up with all that other hoo ra. But in the end, regardless of the amc&#039;s glorious claims, the far majority of them are all the same. Worst agents imaginable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-26191">Vicki Grant</a>.</p>
<p>We all get them. Or at least used to, before we had sense enough to jump off those amc panel lists. Amc is telecom out of the box, they&#8217;re all the same. The appraiser is their customer, they could not exist without the appraiser, and the marketing line is always the same. If we&#8217;re going to support amc&#8217;s, all we ask is they do a better job than we would do, in terms of advocating on our behalf and helping us get a better deal than we would otherwise have in their absence. Who actually selects an agent from a middle management agency whom purposefully drives workload up and fees down?  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tough sale&#8230; That&#8217;s why the dress it up with all that other hoo ra. But in the end, regardless of the amc&#8217;s glorious claims, the far majority of them are all the same. Worst agents imaginable.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="26192" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vicki Grant		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-26191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicki Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-26191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25638&quot;&gt;Baggins&lt;/a&gt;.

I swear you hacked the emails we receive!!  Spot on!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25638">Baggins</a>.</p>
<p>I swear you hacked the emails we receive!!  Spot on!!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="26191" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25634&quot;&gt;Tom Molinari&lt;/a&gt;.

Is that your fee and turn time? If that is a consistent fee you&#039;re willing to offer, we can offer you increased volume. Please sign these documents indemnifying us from all wrong doing, accept the liability of wrong doing by others which you may have no control of, and we&#039;ll look forward to having you on our appraisal management panel. We recently received recognition for being the fastest growing company in our state and our employee satisfaction ratings are through the roof. We also have an exciting new project in the works, which is a hybrid appraisal on our own proprietary forms. We have appraisers completing these in as little as half an hour and at $50 dollars each, many are earning over $100 an hour. We offer typing services for a very low price so we can write most of that report for you, and we also have someone else do the inspection. You&#039;re going to love these, can we sign you up for our hybrid panel as well? Management.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25634">Tom Molinari</a>.</p>
<p>Is that your fee and turn time? If that is a consistent fee you&#8217;re willing to offer, we can offer you increased volume. Please sign these documents indemnifying us from all wrong doing, accept the liability of wrong doing by others which you may have no control of, and we&#8217;ll look forward to having you on our appraisal management panel. We recently received recognition for being the fastest growing company in our state and our employee satisfaction ratings are through the roof. We also have an exciting new project in the works, which is a hybrid appraisal on our own proprietary forms. We have appraisers completing these in as little as half an hour and at $50 dollars each, many are earning over $100 an hour. We offer typing services for a very low price so we can write most of that report for you, and we also have someone else do the inspection. You&#8217;re going to love these, can we sign you up for our hybrid panel as well? Management.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25638" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Molinari		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Molinari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;brief reports ..... that do not summarize the data, evidence, or reasoning used to develop the value opinion.&quot;

Sounds more like a description of the thousands of mortgage appraisals performed every week by certifieds for $275.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;brief reports &#8230;.. that do not summarize the data, evidence, or reasoning used to develop the value opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds more like a description of the thousands of mortgage appraisals performed every week by certifieds for $275.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25634" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCGREA, Realtor®		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ford, AGA, GAA, RAA, SCGREA, Realtor®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article Johnathan. This goes all the way back to California AB624 that ASA, AGA and CaCAP successfully killed after it passed (in appropriations).

I can&#039;t believe AI is undercutting it&#039;s own membership like this. Truly the only people helped by these spurious products are those relatively few MAI&#039;s that own or manage residential AMCs or national &quot;appraisal&quot; firms where high volume production of garbage products is OK by them as long as they can hide behind the scope of work rule (more bad regulation - though foisted on us by TAF...by a few insiders that are bashful about disclosing their designations)

The majority of MAI&#039;s that still compete for C&#038;I work where their training deservedly makes them among the cream of the crop. It is only those few that can&#039;t cut it in the C&#038;I world that have to push out the &#039;junior member&#039; SRA&#039;s that should be providing corporate appraisal expertise for residential appraisal...if only designation were to be the basis for leadership.

AI recently joined with many others to oppose the increase in the de minimis level. A step that unites appraisers and preserves our professionalism. I absolutely cannot fathom why AI National in Chicago also promotes this self destructive policy all over America.

All AI Chapters are doing by promoting these short-sighted bills is to undermine the entire profession. 

When minimal standards of performance are no longer required, then there ceases to be a need for even the restricted bifurcated hybrid hucksters or the MAI&#039;s that want to do them.

They are creating the false illusion that &quot;appraisal&quot; can be performed in assembly-line fashion...by software designers that know nothing of appraisal. Just so long corporate ownership or management is held by an MAI.

A premise that is not unlike thinking Congress Members (or state legislators) are personally reviewing the legislation they author - rather than the paid lobbyists that draft and write the final bills.

Like SB 70.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Johnathan. This goes all the way back to California AB624 that ASA, AGA and CaCAP successfully killed after it passed (in appropriations).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe AI is undercutting it&#8217;s own membership like this. Truly the only people helped by these spurious products are those relatively few MAI&#8217;s that own or manage residential AMCs or national &#8220;appraisal&#8221; firms where high volume production of garbage products is OK by them as long as they can hide behind the scope of work rule (more bad regulation &#8211; though foisted on us by TAF&#8230;by a few insiders that are bashful about disclosing their designations)</p>
<p>The majority of MAI&#8217;s that still compete for C&amp;I work where their training deservedly makes them among the cream of the crop. It is only those few that can&#8217;t cut it in the C&amp;I world that have to push out the &#8216;junior member&#8217; SRA&#8217;s that should be providing corporate appraisal expertise for residential appraisal&#8230;if only designation were to be the basis for leadership.</p>
<p>AI recently joined with many others to oppose the increase in the de minimis level. A step that unites appraisers and preserves our professionalism. I absolutely cannot fathom why AI National in Chicago also promotes this self destructive policy all over America.</p>
<p>All AI Chapters are doing by promoting these short-sighted bills is to undermine the entire profession. </p>
<p>When minimal standards of performance are no longer required, then there ceases to be a need for even the restricted bifurcated hybrid hucksters or the MAI&#8217;s that want to do them.</p>
<p>They are creating the false illusion that &#8220;appraisal&#8221; can be performed in assembly-line fashion&#8230;by software designers that know nothing of appraisal. Just so long corporate ownership or management is held by an MAI.</p>
<p>A premise that is not unlike thinking Congress Members (or state legislators) are personally reviewing the legislation they author &#8211; rather than the paid lobbyists that draft and write the final bills.</p>
<p>Like SB 70.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25630" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 21:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25589&quot;&gt;certresidential&lt;/a&gt;.

The newspapers used to serve these functions better before corporate monopolization and either buy outs or shuttering of most. No more newspaper posting requirements in many jurisdictions. Now that tech companies are boldly advocating for corporate interests as their apparent first priority, calling dissenting opinion as something valid to routinely censor on every front, it&#039;s more difficult than ever for regular consumers to get valid data on who and what to trust. Trusting the government to keep us safe with food, medicine, and finances is a common first mistake in this current period of time.  

Did you know lenders offer a trust option where they virtually guarantee you&#039;ll close on a home, so long as you voluntarily reject your most important forms of unbiased separated consumer protection? And if that does not work out there is another guy standing in line whom will pay cash for your property, no appraisal required. It never ends, caveat emptor. Who&#039;s providing warranty on the hybrid products? The state alert is just window dressing so they could wash their hands of the issue without actually doing anything about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a target="_blank" href="https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25589">certresidential</a>.</p>
<p>The newspapers used to serve these functions better before corporate monopolization and either buy outs or shuttering of most. No more newspaper posting requirements in many jurisdictions. Now that tech companies are boldly advocating for corporate interests as their apparent first priority, calling dissenting opinion as something valid to routinely censor on every front, it&#8217;s more difficult than ever for regular consumers to get valid data on who and what to trust. Trusting the government to keep us safe with food, medicine, and finances is a common first mistake in this current period of time.  </p>
<p>Did you know lenders offer a trust option where they virtually guarantee you&#8217;ll close on a home, so long as you voluntarily reject your most important forms of unbiased separated consumer protection? And if that does not work out there is another guy standing in line whom will pay cash for your property, no appraisal required. It never ends, caveat emptor. Who&#8217;s providing warranty on the hybrid products? The state alert is just window dressing so they could wash their hands of the issue without actually doing anything about it.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25592" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: certresidential		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[certresidential]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article. Unfortunately, it’s the rare consumer who checks state websites. If the information, caveats and knowledge regarding the differences in these types of evaluations and appraisal  reports were able to find their way towards better general PUBLIC  exposure (geared towards consumers/borrowers) the purpose of the states posting would be better served.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Unfortunately, it’s the rare consumer who checks state websites. If the information, caveats and knowledge regarding the differences in these types of evaluations and appraisal  reports were able to find their way towards better general PUBLIC  exposure (geared towards consumers/borrowers) the purpose of the states posting would be better served.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25589" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JW		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like someone has their hand in the cookie jar. Gravitating to the popular fashion of the week seems to be the norm for the higher ups these days. Dismantle the AI in the residential real estate profession. If residential appraisers could all just get along and group up and create the RAI (residential appraisal institute) now would be a good time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like someone has their hand in the cookie jar. Gravitating to the popular fashion of the week seems to be the norm for the higher ups these days. Dismantle the AI in the residential real estate profession. If residential appraisers could all just get along and group up and create the RAI (residential appraisal institute) now would be a good time.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25587" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Advocate		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25586</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advocate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great warning to consumers. Every state should post warning about those hybrid products. Consumer protection is the reason we are licensed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great warning to consumers. Every state should post warning about those hybrid products. Consumer protection is the reason we are licensed!</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25586" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baggins		</title>
		<link>https://appraisersblogs.com/AI-SB-70-debasing-appraisal-professionals/#comment-25585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appraisersblogs.com/?p=21173#comment-25585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The hits keep on coming. Great read, thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hits keep on coming. Great read, thank you.</p>
<div class="cld-like-dislike-wrap cld-template-4">
    <div class="cld-like-wrap  cld-common-wrap">
    <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="cld-like-trigger cld-like-dislike-trigger  " title="" data-comment-id="25585" data-trigger-type="like" data-restriction="cookie" data-already-liked="0">
                        <i class="far fa-smile"></i>
                    </a>
    <span class="cld-like-count-wrap cld-count-wrap">    </span>
</div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
